COWZ vs DGRO: Holdings Overlap
COWZPacer US Cash Cows 100 ETF
Pacer · 100 holdings · $18.8B · as of 2026-04-30
DGROiShares Core Dividend Growth ETF
iShares · 394 holdings · $43.4B · as of 2026-04-30
How similar are COWZ and DGRO?
Pacer US Cash Cows 100 ETF (COWZ, by Pacer) holds 100 positions; iShares Core Dividend Growth ETF (DGRO, by iShares) holds 394. They have 32 holdings in common, and by portfolio weight the two funds are 7.5% identical. In practical terms the pair is lightly overlapping, with most of each portfolio distinct.
- Overlap by Weight
- 7.5%Sum of the smaller weight of each shared holding
- Shared Holdings
- 32COWZ holds 100 · DGRO holds 394
- Weight in Shared Holdings
- COWZ 33%·DGRO 8%Share of each fund's weight in stocks both funds own
Based on each fund's latest official holdings. How is this calculated?
What makes each fund different
Only in COWZ
68 of 100 positions (66.4% of the fund) are not held by DGRO. Showing the top 30 by weight.
Sector Breakdown
| Sector | COWZ | DGRO |
|---|---|---|
| Financials | 0.0% | 21.1% |
| Health Care | 21.0% | 16.4% |
| Information Technology | 19.4% | 18.5% |
| Energy | 16.4% | 5.5% |
| Industrials | 11.7% | 11.5% |
| Other Sectors | 31.4% | 26.8% |
Share of each fund's portfolio weight by GICS-style sector, compiled from issuer fund data and our own classification of the holdings, not the issuers' published sector charts.
Performance
| Fund | 1M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y (ann.) | 5Y (ann.) | 10Y (ann.) | Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| COWZ | +7.8% | +15.6% | +28.0% | +12.8% | +11.6% | — | 1.79% |
| DGRO | +2.4% | +15.5% | +25.2% | +17.4% | +11.3% | +13.6% | 1.86% |
Total returns including dividends, from adjusted daily closes as of 2026-08-07. 3Y/5Y/10Y are annualized. Yield is trailing-12-month distributions over the last close. Past performance does not predict future results.
Project the growth of $10,000 in COWZ vs DGRO →
Shared Holdings(32)
The top 10 shared positions account for 76% of the overlap, led by QCOM, COP and GILD.
2.67% | 1.10% | 1.10% | |
2.17% | 0.99% | 0.99% | |
1.83% | 0.78% | 0.78% | |
1.68% | 0.76% | 0.76% | |
1.30% | 0.58% | 0.58% | |
1.23% | 0.53% | 0.53% | |
1.10% | 0.34% | 0.34% | |
1.63% | 0.24% | 0.24% | |
1.55% | 0.23% | 0.23% | |
1.98% | 0.18% | 0.18% | |
0.99% | 0.15% | 0.15% | |
0.63% | 0.14% | 0.14% | |
0.69% | 0.12% | 0.12% | |
0.34% | 0.11% | 0.11% | |
0.98% | 0.11% | 0.11% | |
1.21% | 0.11% | 0.11% | |
0.59% | 0.10% | 0.10% | |
1.62% | 0.09% | 0.09% | |
0.78% | 0.08% | 0.08% | |
0.40% | 0.08% | 0.08% | |
1.03% | 0.08% | 0.08% | |
1.64% | 0.08% | 0.08% | |
1.79% | 0.08% | 0.08% | |
0.44% | 0.08% | 0.08% | |
0.35% | 0.07% | 0.07% |
Frequently Asked Questions
How much do COWZ and DGRO overlap?
COWZ and DGRO overlap by 7.5% of portfolio weight. They share 32 holdings (COWZ holds 100 positions and DGRO holds 394), based on each fund's latest SEC-reported holdings.
Is it redundant to own both COWZ and DGRO?
The two portfolios are 7.5% identical by weight. Owning both is not redundant. Most of each portfolio is distinct, so the funds can serve different roles.
What are the biggest shared holdings of COWZ and DGRO?
The largest positions held by both funds are QCOM, COP, GILD, ACN and ADP. Together the top 10 shared positions account for 76% of the total overlap.
What does COWZ own that DGRO doesn't?
68 positions (66.4% of COWZ) are unique to COWZ, led by MO, CVS and BMY. In the other direction, 362 positions (92.2% of DGRO) are unique to DGRO.