COWZ vs DGRW: Holdings Overlap
COWZPacer US Cash Cows 100 ETF
Pacer · 100 holdings · $18.8B · as of 2026-04-30
DGRWWisdomTree U.S. Quality Dividend Growth Fund
WisdomTree · 198 holdings · $17.2B · as of 2026-03-31
Holdings snapshots are 30 days apart (COWZ: 2026-04-30, DGRW: 2026-03-31). Weights and index membership change between snapshots, so the true current overlap is typically higher than shown. For funds tracking the same index, the gap can be 5–15 points.
How similar are COWZ and DGRW?
Pacer US Cash Cows 100 ETF (COWZ, by Pacer) holds 100 positions; WisdomTree U.S. Quality Dividend Growth Fund (DGRW, by WisdomTree) holds 198. They have 31 holdings in common, and by portfolio weight the two funds are 12.6% identical. In practical terms the pair is lightly overlapping, with most of each portfolio distinct.
- Overlap by Weight
- 12.6%Sum of the smaller weight of each shared holding
- Shared Holdings
- 31COWZ holds 100 · DGRW holds 198
- Weight in Shared Holdings
- COWZ 40%·DGRW 13%Share of each fund's weight in stocks both funds own
Based on each fund's latest official holdings. How is this calculated?
What makes each fund different
Only in COWZ
69 of 100 positions (59.5% of the fund) are not held by DGRW. Showing the top 30 by weight.
Sector Breakdown
| Sector | COWZ | DGRW |
|---|---|---|
| Information Technology | 19.4% | 28.5% |
| Health Care | 21.0% | 13.8% |
| Energy | 16.4% | 6.1% |
| Communication Services | 8.1% | 12.9% |
| Industrials | 11.7% | 10.3% |
| Other Sectors | 23.3% | 28.3% |
Share of each fund's portfolio weight by GICS-style sector, compiled from issuer fund data and our own classification of the holdings, not the issuers' published sector charts.
Performance
| Fund | 1M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y (ann.) | 5Y (ann.) | 10Y (ann.) | Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| COWZ | +7.8% | +15.6% | +28.0% | +12.8% | +11.6% | — | 1.79% |
| DGRW | +3.9% | +12.6% | +18.6% | +15.8% | +12.2% | +14.1% | 1.23% |
Total returns including dividends, from adjusted daily closes as of 2026-08-07. 3Y/5Y/10Y are annualized. Yield is trailing-12-month distributions over the last close. Past performance does not predict future results.
Project the growth of $10,000 in COWZ vs DGRW →
Shared Holdings(31)
The top 10 shared positions account for 77% of the overlap, led by TMUS, GILD and VZ.
1.78% | 1.99% | 1.78% | |
1.83% | 1.52% | 1.52% | |
1.90% | 1.46% | 1.46% | |
1.84% | 1.21% | 1.21% | |
1.93% | 0.88% | 0.88% | |
1.17% | 0.74% | 0.74% | |
1.30% | 0.69% | 0.69% | |
0.99% | 0.51% | 0.51% | |
1.76% | 0.50% | 0.50% | |
1.79% | 0.45% | 0.45% | |
2.01% | 0.40% | 0.40% | |
1.47% | 0.36% | 0.36% | |
1.21% | 0.34% | 0.34% | |
1.87% | 0.23% | 0.23% | |
0.58% | 0.20% | 0.20% | |
0.35% | 0.19% | 0.19% | |
1.63% | 0.19% | 0.19% | |
0.64% | 0.18% | 0.18% | |
0.37% | 0.17% | 0.17% | |
2.17% | 0.15% | 0.15% | |
1.23% | 0.08% | 0.08% | |
1.78% | 0.07% | 0.07% | |
1.47% | 0.07% | 0.07% | |
1.98% | 0.05% | 0.05% | |
0.92% | 0.04% | 0.04% |
Frequently Asked Questions
How much do COWZ and DGRW overlap?
COWZ and DGRW overlap by 12.6% of portfolio weight. They share 31 holdings (COWZ holds 100 positions and DGRW holds 198), based on each fund's latest SEC-reported holdings.
Is it redundant to own both COWZ and DGRW?
The two portfolios are 12.6% identical by weight. Owning both is not redundant. Most of each portfolio is distinct, so the funds can serve different roles.
What are the biggest shared holdings of COWZ and DGRW?
The largest positions held by both funds are TMUS, GILD, VZ, T and NEM. Together the top 10 shared positions account for 77% of the total overlap.
What does COWZ own that DGRW doesn't?
69 positions (59.5% of COWZ) are unique to COWZ, led by QCOM, MO and CVS. In the other direction, 167 positions (87.1% of DGRW) are unique to DGRW.