COWZ vs ESGU: Holdings Overlap
COWZPacer US Cash Cows 100 ETF
Pacer · 100 holdings · $18.8B · as of 2026-04-30
ESGUiShares ESG Aware MSCI USA ETF
iShares · 287 holdings · $18.3B · as of 2026-05-31
Holdings snapshots are 31 days apart (COWZ: 2026-04-30, ESGU: 2026-05-31). Weights and index membership change between snapshots, so the true current overlap is typically higher than shown. For funds tracking the same index, the gap can be 5–15 points.
How similar are COWZ and ESGU?
Pacer US Cash Cows 100 ETF (COWZ, by Pacer) holds 100 positions; iShares ESG Aware MSCI USA ETF (ESGU, by iShares) holds 287. They have 55 holdings in common, and by portfolio weight the two funds are 8.9% identical. In practical terms the pair is lightly overlapping, with most of each portfolio distinct.
- Overlap by Weight
- 8.9%Sum of the smaller weight of each shared holding
- Shared Holdings
- 55COWZ holds 100 · ESGU holds 287
- Weight in Shared Holdings
- COWZ 66%·ESGU 9%Share of each fund's weight in stocks both funds own
Based on each fund's latest official holdings. How is this calculated?
What makes each fund different
Only in COWZ
45 of 100 positions (34.2% of the fund) are not held by ESGU. Showing the top 30 by weight.
Sector Breakdown
| Sector | COWZ | ESGU |
|---|---|---|
| Information Technology | 19.4% | 38.9% |
| Health Care | 21.0% | 8.5% |
| Energy | 16.4% | 3.3% |
| Industrials | 11.7% | 8.9% |
| Financials | 0.0% | 11.4% |
| Other Sectors | 31.4% | 28.8% |
Share of each fund's portfolio weight by GICS-style sector, compiled from issuer fund data and our own classification of the holdings, not the issuers' published sector charts.
Performance
| Fund | 1M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y (ann.) | 5Y (ann.) | 10Y (ann.) | Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| COWZ | +7.8% | +15.6% | +28.0% | +12.8% | +11.6% | — | 1.79% |
| ESGU | +3.3% | +14.3% | +23.8% | +20.9% | +12.2% | — | 0.90% |
Total returns including dividends, from adjusted daily closes as of 2026-08-07. 3Y/5Y/10Y are annualized. Yield is trailing-12-month distributions over the last close. Past performance does not predict future results.
Project the growth of $10,000 in COWZ vs ESGU →
Shared Holdings(55)
The top 10 shared positions account for 33% of the overlap, led by VZ, GILD and ADP.
1.90% | 0.38% | 0.38% | |
1.83% | 0.36% | 0.36% | |
1.30% | 0.36% | 0.36% | |
2.67% | 0.34% | 0.34% | |
1.76% | 0.31% | 0.31% | |
2.00% | 0.27% | 0.27% | |
2.17% | 0.25% | 0.25% | |
1.75% | 0.24% | 0.24% | |
1.87% | 0.22% | 0.22% | |
1.63% | 0.21% | 0.21% | |
1.68% | 0.21% | 0.21% | |
1.62% | 0.21% | 0.21% | |
0.59% | 0.20% | 0.20% | |
1.84% | 0.20% | 0.20% | |
0.72% | 0.20% | 0.20% | |
1.79% | 0.19% | 0.19% | |
1.93% | 0.19% | 0.19% | |
0.47% | 0.19% | 0.19% | |
1.10% | 0.18% | 0.18% | |
1.98% | 0.17% | 0.17% | |
0.62% | 0.17% | 0.17% | |
1.12% | 0.17% | 0.17% | |
1.03% | 0.16% | 0.16% | |
0.36% | 0.16% | 0.16% | |
0.35% | 0.16% | 0.16% |
Frequently Asked Questions
How much do COWZ and ESGU overlap?
COWZ and ESGU overlap by 8.9% of portfolio weight. They share 55 holdings (COWZ holds 100 positions and ESGU holds 287), based on each fund's latest SEC-reported holdings.
Is it redundant to own both COWZ and ESGU?
The two portfolios are 8.9% identical by weight. Owning both is not redundant. Most of each portfolio is distinct, so the funds can serve different roles.
What are the biggest shared holdings of COWZ and ESGU?
The largest positions held by both funds are VZ, GILD, ADP, QCOM and CRM. Together the top 10 shared positions account for 33% of the total overlap.
What does COWZ own that ESGU doesn't?
45 positions (34.2% of COWZ) are unique to COWZ, led by MO, F and MPC. In the other direction, 232 positions (90.9% of ESGU) are unique to ESGU.