COWZ vs FTCS: Holdings Overlap
COWZPacer US Cash Cows 100 ETF
Pacer · 100 holdings · $18.8B · as of 2026-04-30
FTCSFirst Trust Capital Strength ETF
First Trust · 50 holdings · $7.9B · as of 2026-03-31
Holdings snapshots are 30 days apart (COWZ: 2026-04-30, FTCS: 2026-03-31). Weights and index membership change between snapshots, so the true current overlap is typically higher than shown. For funds tracking the same index, the gap can be 5–15 points.
How similar are COWZ and FTCS?
Pacer US Cash Cows 100 ETF (COWZ, by Pacer) holds 100 positions; First Trust Capital Strength ETF (FTCS, by First Trust) holds 50. They have 12 holdings in common, and by portfolio weight the two funds are 10.8% identical. In practical terms the pair is lightly overlapping, with most of each portfolio distinct.
- Overlap by Weight
- 10.8%Sum of the smaller weight of each shared holding
- Shared Holdings
- 12COWZ holds 100 · FTCS holds 50
- Weight in Shared Holdings
- COWZ 11%·FTCS 23%Share of each fund's weight in stocks both funds own
Based on each fund's latest official holdings. How is this calculated?
What makes each fund different
Only in COWZ
88 of 100 positions (88.8% of the fund) are not held by FTCS. Showing the top 30 by weight.
Sector Breakdown
| Sector | COWZ | FTCS |
|---|---|---|
| Financials | 0.0% | 23.0% |
| Industrials | 11.7% | 21.5% |
| Health Care | 21.0% | 12.1% |
| Information Technology | 19.4% | 9.2% |
| Consumer Staples | 9.6% | 17.0% |
| Other Sectors | 38.2% | 17.2% |
Share of each fund's portfolio weight by GICS-style sector, compiled from issuer fund data and our own classification of the holdings, not the issuers' published sector charts.
Performance
| Fund | 1M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y (ann.) | 5Y (ann.) | 10Y (ann.) | Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| COWZ | +7.8% | +15.6% | +28.0% | +12.8% | +11.6% | — | 1.79% |
| FTCS | +2.7% | +8.9% | +11.0% | +10.9% | +6.3% | +10.8% | 1.06% |
Total returns including dividends, from adjusted daily closes as of 2026-08-07. 3Y/5Y/10Y are annualized. Yield is trailing-12-month distributions over the last close. Past performance does not predict future results.
Project the growth of $10,000 in COWZ vs FTCS →
Shared Holdings(12)
The top 10 shared positions account for 94% of the overlap, led by GILD, ACN and ADP.
 GILDGilead Sciences Inc. COM | 1.83% | 2.31% | 1.83% |
|---|---|---|---|
 ACNAccenture PLC SHS CLASS A | 1.68% | 1.43% | 1.43% |
 ADPAutomatic Data Processing, Inc. COM | 1.30% | 1.61% | 1.30% |
 EOGEOG Resources Inc. COM | 1.23% | 2.84% | 1.23% |
 CLColgate-Palmolive Co. COM | 1.10% | 2.09% | 1.10% |
 CORCencora Inc COM | 1.03% | 1.83% | 1.03% |
 ADSKAutodesk Inc COM | 0.72% | 1.86% | 0.72% |
 PAYXPaychex Inc COM | 0.58% | 1.71% | 0.58% |
 RMDResMed Inc. COM | 0.50% | 1.80% | 0.50% |
 CPRTCopart Inc COM | 0.41% | 1.67% | 0.41% |
 SNASnap-On Incorporated COM | 0.34% | 2.08% | 0.34% |
 NVRNVR Inc COM | 0.33% | 1.80% | 0.33% |
Frequently Asked Questions
How much do COWZ and FTCS overlap?
COWZ and FTCS overlap by 10.8% of portfolio weight. They share 12 holdings (COWZ holds 100 positions and FTCS holds 50), based on each fund's latest SEC-reported holdings.
Is it redundant to own both COWZ and FTCS?
The two portfolios are 10.8% identical by weight. Owning both is not redundant. Most of each portfolio is distinct, so the funds can serve different roles.
What are the biggest shared holdings of COWZ and FTCS?
The largest positions held by both funds are GILD, ACN, ADP, EOG and CL. Together the top 10 shared positions account for 94% of the total overlap.
What does COWZ own that FTCS doesn't?
88 positions (88.8% of COWZ) are unique to COWZ, led by QCOM, MO and COP. In the other direction, 38 positions (76.9% of FTCS) are unique to FTCS.