COWZ vs IJH: Holdings Overlap
COWZPacer US Cash Cows 100 ETF
Pacer · 100 holdings · $18.8B · as of 2026-04-30
IJHiShares Core S&P Mid-Cap ETF
iShares · 399 holdings · $126.1B · as of 2026-03-31
Holdings snapshots are 30 days apart (COWZ: 2026-04-30, IJH: 2026-03-31). Weights and index membership change between snapshots, so the true current overlap is typically higher than shown. For funds tracking the same index, the gap can be 5–15 points.
How similar are COWZ and IJH?
Pacer US Cash Cows 100 ETF (COWZ, by Pacer) holds 100 positions; iShares Core S&P Mid-Cap ETF (IJH, by iShares) holds 399. They have 6 holdings in common, and by portfolio weight the two funds are 2.8% identical. In practical terms the pair is essentially distinct, holding almost none of the same securities.
- Overlap by Weight
- 2.8%Sum of the smaller weight of each shared holding
- Shared Holdings
- 6COWZ holds 100 · IJH holds 399
- Weight in Shared Holdings
- COWZ 3%·IJH 4%Share of each fund's weight in stocks both funds own
Based on each fund's latest official holdings. How is this calculated?
What makes each fund different
Only in COWZ
94 of 100 positions (96.9% of the fund) are not held by IJH. Showing the top 30 by weight.
Sector Breakdown
| Sector | COWZ | IJH |
|---|---|---|
| Industrials | 11.7% | 25.3% |
| Health Care | 21.0% | 8.9% |
| Information Technology | 19.4% | 12.3% |
| Energy | 16.4% | 5.4% |
| Financials | 0.0% | 14.6% |
| Other Sectors | 31.4% | 33.0% |
Share of each fund's portfolio weight by GICS-style sector, compiled from issuer fund data and our own classification of the holdings, not the issuers' published sector charts.
Performance
| Fund | 1M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y (ann.) | 5Y (ann.) | 10Y (ann.) | Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| COWZ | +7.8% | +15.6% | +28.0% | +12.8% | +11.6% | — | 1.79% |
| IJH | +3.1% | +18.4% | +26.0% | +14.5% | +9.0% | +11.2% | 1.14% |
Total returns including dividends, from adjusted daily closes as of 2026-08-07. 3Y/5Y/10Y are annualized. Yield is trailing-12-month distributions over the last close. Past performance does not predict future results.
Project the growth of $10,000 in COWZ vs IJH →
Shared Holdings(6)
The top 6 shared positions account for 100% of the overlap, led by FLEX, FTI and THC.
 FLEXFlex Ltd. COM USD0.01 | 0.59% | 0.75% | 0.59% |
|---|---|---|---|
 FTITechnipFMC PLC USD1 | 0.58% | 0.87% | 0.58% |
 THCTenet Healthcare Corporation COM NEW | 0.63% | 0.52% | 0.52% |
 UTHRUnited Therapeutics Corporation COM | 0.41% | 0.80% | 0.41% |
 TWLOTwilio Inc CL A | 0.36% | 0.60% | 0.36% |
 ILMNIllumina Inc COM | 0.31% | 0.59% | 0.31% |
Frequently Asked Questions
How much do COWZ and IJH overlap?
COWZ and IJH overlap by 2.8% of portfolio weight. They share 6 holdings (COWZ holds 100 positions and IJH holds 399), based on each fund's latest SEC-reported holdings.
Is it redundant to own both COWZ and IJH?
The two portfolios are 2.8% identical by weight. Owning both is genuine diversification: the funds hold almost none of the same securities.
What are the biggest shared holdings of COWZ and IJH?
The largest positions held by both funds are FLEX, FTI, THC, UTHR and TWLO. Together the top 6 shared positions account for 100% of the total overlap.
What does COWZ own that IJH doesn't?
94 positions (96.9% of COWZ) are unique to COWZ, led by QCOM, MO and COP. In the other direction, 393 positions (95.3% of IJH) are unique to IJH.