COWZ vs ITB: Holdings Overlap
COWZPacer US Cash Cows 100 ETF
Pacer · 100 holdings · $18.8B · as of 2026-04-30
ITBiShares U.S. Home Construction ETF
iShares · 46 holdings · $2.3B · as of 2026-03-31
Holdings snapshots are 30 days apart (COWZ: 2026-04-30, ITB: 2026-03-31). Weights and index membership change between snapshots, so the true current overlap is typically higher than shown. For funds tracking the same index, the gap can be 5–15 points.
How similar are COWZ and ITB?
Pacer US Cash Cows 100 ETF (COWZ, by Pacer) holds 100 positions; iShares U.S. Home Construction ETF (ITB, by iShares) holds 46. They have 3 holdings in common, and by portfolio weight the two funds are 2.1% identical. In practical terms the pair is essentially distinct, holding almost none of the same securities.
- Overlap by Weight
- 2.1%Sum of the smaller weight of each shared holding
- Shared Holdings
- 3COWZ holds 100 · ITB holds 46
- Weight in Shared Holdings
- COWZ 2%·ITB 32%Share of each fund's weight in stocks both funds own
Based on each fund's latest official holdings. How is this calculated?
What makes each fund different
Only in COWZ
97 of 100 positions (97.7% of the fund) are not held by ITB. Showing the top 30 by weight.
Sector Breakdown
| Sector | COWZ | ITB |
|---|---|---|
| Consumer Discretionary | 9.8% | 73.0% |
| Health Care | 21.0% | 0.0% |
| Industrials | 11.7% | 20.8% |
| Information Technology | 19.4% | 0.0% |
| Energy | 16.4% | 0.0% |
| Other Sectors | 21.5% | 6.0% |
Share of each fund's portfolio weight by GICS-style sector, compiled from issuer fund data and our own classification of the holdings, not the issuers' published sector charts.
Performance
| Fund | 1M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y (ann.) | 5Y (ann.) | 10Y (ann.) | Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| COWZ | +7.8% | +15.6% | +28.0% | +12.8% | +11.6% | — | 1.79% |
| ITB | +1.3% | +5.4% | -1.5% | +5.3% | +8.1% | +14.1% | 0.64% |
Total returns including dividends, from adjusted daily closes as of 2026-08-07. 3Y/5Y/10Y are annualized. Yield is trailing-12-month distributions over the last close. Past performance does not predict future results.
Project the growth of $10,000 in COWZ vs ITB →
Shared Holdings(3)
The top 3 shared positions account for 100% of the overlap, led by DHI, PHM and NVR.
Frequently Asked Questions
How much do COWZ and ITB overlap?
COWZ and ITB overlap by 2.1% of portfolio weight. They share 3 holdings (COWZ holds 100 positions and ITB holds 46), based on each fund's latest SEC-reported holdings.
Is it redundant to own both COWZ and ITB?
The two portfolios are 2.1% identical by weight. Owning both is genuine diversification: the funds hold almost none of the same securities.
What are the biggest shared holdings of COWZ and ITB?
The largest positions held by both funds are DHI, PHM and NVR. Together the top 3 shared positions account for 100% of the total overlap.
What does COWZ own that ITB doesn't?
97 positions (97.7% of COWZ) are unique to COWZ, led by QCOM, MO and COP. In the other direction, 43 positions (68.2% of ITB) are unique to ITB.