COWZ vs ITOT: Holdings Overlap
COWZPacer US Cash Cows 100 ETF
Pacer · 100 holdings · $18.8B · as of 2026-04-30
ITOTiShares Core S&P Total U.S. Stock Market ETF
iShares · 2487 holdings · $97.6B · as of 2026-03-31
Holdings snapshots are 30 days apart (COWZ: 2026-04-30, ITOT: 2026-03-31). Weights and index membership change between snapshots, so the true current overlap is typically higher than shown. For funds tracking the same index, the gap can be 5–15 points.
How similar are COWZ and ITOT?
Pacer US Cash Cows 100 ETF (COWZ, by Pacer) holds 100 positions; iShares Core S&P Total U.S. Stock Market ETF (ITOT, by iShares) holds 2487. They have 100 holdings in common, and by portfolio weight the two funds are 8.3% identical. In practical terms the pair is lightly overlapping, with most of each portfolio distinct.
- Overlap by Weight
- 8.3%Sum of the smaller weight of each shared holding
- Shared Holdings
- 100COWZ holds 100 · ITOT holds 2487
- Weight in Shared Holdings
- COWZ 100%·ITOT 8%Share of each fund's weight in stocks both funds own
Based on each fund's latest official holdings. How is this calculated?
What makes each fund different
Only in COWZ
Every position in COWZ is also held by ITOT, so it brings nothing the other fund doesn’t already own.
Sector Breakdown
| Sector | COWZ | ITOT |
|---|---|---|
| Information Technology | 19.4% | 30.8% |
| Health Care | 21.0% | 9.9% |
| Energy | 16.4% | 4.2% |
| Financials | 0.0% | 12.9% |
| Industrials | 11.7% | 10.2% |
| Other Sectors | 31.4% | 31.7% |
Share of each fund's portfolio weight by GICS-style sector, compiled from issuer fund data and our own classification of the holdings, not the issuers' published sector charts.
Performance
| Fund | 1M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y (ann.) | 5Y (ann.) | 10Y (ann.) | Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| COWZ | +7.8% | +15.6% | +28.0% | +12.8% | +11.6% | — | 1.79% |
| ITOT | +3.3% | +14.6% | +24.1% | +20.9% | +12.3% | +14.9% | 0.97% |
Total returns including dividends, from adjusted daily closes as of 2026-08-07. 3Y/5Y/10Y are annualized. Yield is trailing-12-month distributions over the last close. Past performance does not predict future results.
Project the growth of $10,000 in COWZ vs ITOT →
Shared Holdings(100)
The top 10 shared positions account for 31% of the overlap, led by VZ, T and CRM.
1.90% | 0.33% | 0.33% | |
1.84% | 0.32% | 0.32% | |
1.76% | 0.28% | 0.28% | |
1.83% | 0.27% | 0.27% | |
2.17% | 0.26% | 0.26% | |
1.99% | 0.25% | 0.25% | |
2.00% | 0.23% | 0.23% | |
2.67% | 0.22% | 0.22% | |
1.87% | 0.21% | 0.21% | |
2.03% | 0.20% | 0.20% | |
1.68% | 0.19% | 0.19% | |
1.63% | 0.19% | 0.19% | |
1.93% | 0.19% | 0.19% | |
2.20% | 0.17% | 0.17% | |
1.79% | 0.17% | 0.17% | |
1.71% | 0.16% | 0.16% | |
1.75% | 0.16% | 0.16% | |
1.78% | 0.16% | 0.16% | |
2.16% | 0.14% | 0.14% | |
1.30% | 0.13% | 0.13% | |
1.23% | 0.12% | 0.12% | |
1.17% | 0.12% | 0.12% | |
1.83% | 0.12% | 0.12% | |
1.47% | 0.12% | 0.12% | |
1.64% | 0.12% | 0.12% |
Frequently Asked Questions
How much do COWZ and ITOT overlap?
COWZ and ITOT overlap by 8.3% of portfolio weight. They share 100 holdings (COWZ holds 100 positions and ITOT holds 2487), based on each fund's latest SEC-reported holdings.
Is it redundant to own both COWZ and ITOT?
The two portfolios are 8.3% identical by weight. Owning both is not redundant. Most of each portfolio is distinct, so the funds can serve different roles.
What are the biggest shared holdings of COWZ and ITOT?
The largest positions held by both funds are VZ, T, CRM, GILD and COP. Together the top 10 shared positions account for 31% of the total overlap.
What does COWZ own that ITOT doesn't?
Nothing. Every position in COWZ is also held by ITOT. In the other direction, 2387 positions (91.4% of ITOT) are unique to ITOT.