COWZ vs IWD: Holdings Overlap
COWZPacer US Cash Cows 100 ETF
Pacer · 100 holdings · $18.8B · as of 2026-04-30
IWDiShares Russell 1000 Value ETF
iShares · 866 holdings · $83.6B · as of 2026-03-31
Holdings snapshots are 30 days apart (COWZ: 2026-04-30, IWD: 2026-03-31). Weights and index membership change between snapshots, so the true current overlap is typically higher than shown. For funds tracking the same index, the gap can be 5–15 points.
How similar are COWZ and IWD?
Pacer US Cash Cows 100 ETF (COWZ, by Pacer) holds 100 positions; iShares Russell 1000 Value ETF (IWD, by iShares) holds 866. They have 92 holdings in common, and by portfolio weight the two funds are 13.2% identical. In practical terms the pair is lightly overlapping, with most of each portfolio distinct.
- Overlap by Weight
- 13.2%Sum of the smaller weight of each shared holding
- Shared Holdings
- 92COWZ holds 100 · IWD holds 866
- Weight in Shared Holdings
- COWZ 89%·IWD 13%Share of each fund's weight in stocks both funds own
Based on each fund's latest official holdings. How is this calculated?
What makes each fund different
Only in COWZ
8 of 100 positions (10.5% of the fund) are not held by IWD.
Only in IWD
774 of 866 positions (86.5% of the fund) are not held by COWZ. Showing the top 30 by weight.
Sector Breakdown
| Sector | COWZ | IWD |
|---|---|---|
| Health Care | 21.0% | 11.7% |
| Financials | 0.0% | 20.0% |
| Information Technology | 19.4% | 11.7% |
| Energy | 16.4% | 7.7% |
| Industrials | 11.7% | 13.4% |
| Other Sectors | 31.4% | 35.4% |
Share of each fund's portfolio weight by GICS-style sector, compiled from issuer fund data and our own classification of the holdings, not the issuers' published sector charts.
Performance
| Fund | 1M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y (ann.) | 5Y (ann.) | 10Y (ann.) | Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| COWZ | +7.8% | +15.6% | +28.0% | +12.8% | +11.6% | — | 1.79% |
| IWD | +4.0% | +23.3% | +34.5% | +19.0% | +11.9% | +11.7% | 1.36% |
Total returns including dividends, from adjusted daily closes as of 2026-08-07. 3Y/5Y/10Y are annualized. Yield is trailing-12-month distributions over the last close. Past performance does not predict future results.
Project the growth of $10,000 in COWZ vs IWD →
Shared Holdings(92)
The top 10 shared positions account for 37% of the overlap, led by VZ, T and COP.
1.90% | 0.70% | 0.70% | |
1.84% | 0.66% | 0.66% | |
2.17% | 0.54% | 0.54% | |
1.99% | 0.52% | 0.52% | |
1.76% | 0.50% | 0.50% | |
1.83% | 0.42% | 0.42% | |
1.68% | 0.40% | 0.40% | |
1.93% | 0.39% | 0.39% | |
2.20% | 0.37% | 0.37% | |
2.67% | 0.35% | 0.35% | |
1.71% | 0.34% | 0.34% | |
1.78% | 0.33% | 0.33% | |
2.03% | 0.33% | 0.33% | |
2.16% | 0.30% | 0.30% | |
1.23% | 0.26% | 0.26% | |
1.17% | 0.26% | 0.26% | |
1.47% | 0.25% | 0.25% | |
1.78% | 0.24% | 0.24% | |
1.68% | 0.24% | 0.24% | |
1.83% | 0.23% | 0.23% | |
1.64% | 0.20% | 0.20% | |
0.99% | 0.20% | 0.20% | |
0.98% | 0.19% | 0.19% | |
1.07% | 0.18% | 0.18% | |
1.53% | 0.15% | 0.15% |
Frequently Asked Questions
How much do COWZ and IWD overlap?
COWZ and IWD overlap by 13.2% of portfolio weight. They share 92 holdings (COWZ holds 100 positions and IWD holds 866), based on each fund's latest SEC-reported holdings.
Is it redundant to own both COWZ and IWD?
The two portfolios are 13.2% identical by weight. Owning both is not redundant. Most of each portfolio is distinct, so the funds can serve different roles.
What are the biggest shared holdings of COWZ and IWD?
The largest positions held by both funds are VZ, T, COP, PFE and CRM. Together the top 10 shared positions account for 37% of the total overlap.
What does COWZ own that IWD doesn't?
8 positions (10.5% of COWZ) are unique to COWZ, led by UBER, ADBE and INTU. In the other direction, 774 positions (86.5% of IWD) are unique to IWD.