COWZ vs IWP: Holdings Overlap
COWZPacer US Cash Cows 100 ETF
Pacer · 100 holdings · $18.8B · as of 2026-04-30
IWPiShares Russell Mid-Cap Growth ETF
iShares · 277 holdings · $20.5B · as of 2026-03-31
Holdings snapshots are 30 days apart (COWZ: 2026-04-30, IWP: 2026-03-31). Weights and index membership change between snapshots, so the true current overlap is typically higher than shown. For funds tracking the same index, the gap can be 5–15 points.
How similar are COWZ and IWP?
Pacer US Cash Cows 100 ETF (COWZ, by Pacer) holds 100 positions; iShares Russell Mid-Cap Growth ETF (IWP, by iShares) holds 277. They have 15 holdings in common, and by portfolio weight the two funds are 6.0% identical. In practical terms the pair is lightly overlapping, with most of each portfolio distinct.
- Overlap by Weight
- 6.0%Sum of the smaller weight of each shared holding
- Shared Holdings
- 15COWZ holds 100 · IWP holds 277
- Weight in Shared Holdings
- COWZ 9%·IWP 8%Share of each fund's weight in stocks both funds own
Based on each fund's latest official holdings. How is this calculated?
What makes each fund different
Only in COWZ
85 of 100 positions (90.9% of the fund) are not held by IWP. Showing the top 30 by weight.
Only in IWP
262 of 277 positions (91.9% of the fund) are not held by COWZ. Showing the top 30 by weight.
Sector Breakdown
| Sector | COWZ | IWP |
|---|---|---|
| Industrials | 11.7% | 24.4% |
| Consumer Discretionary | 9.8% | 21.2% |
| Health Care | 21.0% | 14.9% |
| Information Technology | 19.4% | 15.6% |
| Energy | 16.4% | 4.1% |
| Other Sectors | 21.5% | 19.7% |
Share of each fund's portfolio weight by GICS-style sector, compiled from issuer fund data and our own classification of the holdings, not the issuers' published sector charts.
Performance
| Fund | 1M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y (ann.) | 5Y (ann.) | 10Y (ann.) | Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| COWZ | +7.8% | +15.6% | +28.0% | +12.8% | +11.6% | — | 1.79% |
| IWP | +1.5% | +5.4% | +3.1% | +14.6% | +5.1% | +12.1% | 0.34% |
Total returns including dividends, from adjusted daily closes as of 2026-08-07. 3Y/5Y/10Y are annualized. Yield is trailing-12-month distributions over the last close. Past performance does not predict future results.
Project the growth of $10,000 in COWZ vs IWP →
Shared Holdings(15)
The top 10 shared positions account for 92% of the overlap, led by COR, EXPE and CAH.
 CORCencora, Inc. | 1.03% | 2.07% | 1.03% |
|---|---|---|---|
 EXPEExpedia Group, Inc. | 1.03% | 0.96% | 0.96% |
 CAHCardinal Health, Inc. | 1.62% | 0.91% | 0.91% |
 JBLJabil, Inc. | 0.55% | 0.65% | 0.55% |
 TPRTapestry, Inc. | 0.55% | 0.95% | 0.55% |
 VEEVVeeva Systems, Inc., Class A | 0.36% | 0.75% | 0.36% |
 PAYXPaychex, Inc. | 0.58% | 0.34% | 0.34% |
 LULULululemon Athletica, Inc. | 0.30% | 0.33% | 0.30% |
 NTAPNetApp, Inc. | 0.59% | 0.29% | 0.29% |
 RMDResMed, Inc. | 0.50% | 0.28% | 0.28% |
 INCYIncyte Corp. | 0.44% | 0.14% | 0.14% |
 WSMWilliams-Sonoma, Inc. | 0.35% | 0.11% | 0.11% |
 TWLOTwilio, Inc., Class A | 0.36% | 0.11% | 0.11% |
 PTCPTC, Inc. | 0.25% | 0.07% | 0.07% |
 CDWCDW Corp/DE | 0.40% | 0.04% | 0.04% |
Frequently Asked Questions
How much do COWZ and IWP overlap?
COWZ and IWP overlap by 6.0% of portfolio weight. They share 15 holdings (COWZ holds 100 positions and IWP holds 277), based on each fund's latest SEC-reported holdings.
Is it redundant to own both COWZ and IWP?
The two portfolios are 6.0% identical by weight. Owning both is not redundant. Most of each portfolio is distinct, so the funds can serve different roles.
What are the biggest shared holdings of COWZ and IWP?
The largest positions held by both funds are COR, EXPE, CAH, JBL and TPR. Together the top 10 shared positions account for 92% of the total overlap.
What does COWZ own that IWP doesn't?
85 positions (90.9% of COWZ) are unique to COWZ, led by QCOM, MO and COP. In the other direction, 262 positions (91.9% of IWP) are unique to IWP.