COWZ vs IYK: Holdings Overlap
COWZPacer US Cash Cows 100 ETF
Pacer · 100 holdings · $18.8B · as of 2026-04-30
IYKiShares U.S. Consumer Staples ETF
iShares · 54 holdings · $1.4B · as of 2026-04-30
How similar are COWZ and IYK?
Pacer US Cash Cows 100 ETF (COWZ, by Pacer) holds 100 positions; iShares U.S. Consumer Staples ETF (IYK, by iShares) holds 54. They have 11 holdings in common, and by portfolio weight the two funds are 13.2% identical. In practical terms the pair is lightly overlapping, with most of each portfolio distinct.
- Overlap by Weight
- 13.2%Sum of the smaller weight of each shared holding
- Shared Holdings
- 11COWZ holds 100 · IYK holds 54
- Weight in Shared Holdings
- COWZ 13%·IYK 27%Share of each fund's weight in stocks both funds own
Based on each fund's latest official holdings. How is this calculated?
What makes each fund different
Only in COWZ
89 of 100 positions (86.4% of the fund) are not held by IYK. Showing the top 30 by weight.
Only in IYK
43 of 54 positions (72.5% of the fund) are not held by COWZ. Showing the top 30 by weight.
Sector Breakdown
| Sector | COWZ | IYK |
|---|---|---|
| Consumer Staples | 9.6% | 86.1% |
| Health Care | 21.0% | 10.8% |
| Information Technology | 19.4% | 0.0% |
| Energy | 16.4% | 0.0% |
| Industrials | 11.7% | 0.0% |
| Other Sectors | 21.8% | 2.7% |
Share of each fund's portfolio weight by GICS-style sector, compiled from issuer fund data and our own classification of the holdings, not the issuers' published sector charts.
Performance
| Fund | 1M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y (ann.) | 5Y (ann.) | 10Y (ann.) | Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| COWZ | +7.8% | +15.6% | +28.0% | +12.8% | +11.6% | — | 1.79% |
| IYK | -0.8% | +12.4% | +9.8% | +6.0% | +6.4% | +9.2% | 2.55% |
Total returns including dividends, from adjusted daily closes as of 2026-08-07. 3Y/5Y/10Y are annualized. Yield is trailing-12-month distributions over the last close. Past performance does not predict future results.
Project the growth of $10,000 in COWZ vs IYK →
Shared Holdings(11)
The top 10 shared positions account for 97% of the overlap, led by MO, CVS and MCK.
2.20% | 4.84% | 2.20% | |
2.16% | 4.29% | 2.16% | |
1.79% | 3.95% | 1.79% | |
1.55% | 1.72% | 1.55% | |
1.10% | 3.05% | 1.10% | |
1.03% | 2.60% | 1.03% | |
0.98% | 2.65% | 0.98% | |
1.12% | 0.94% | 0.94% | |
0.63% | 1.08% | 0.63% | |
0.47% | 0.91% | 0.47% | |
0.35% | 1.13% | 0.35% |
Frequently Asked Questions
How much do COWZ and IYK overlap?
COWZ and IYK overlap by 13.2% of portfolio weight. They share 11 holdings (COWZ holds 100 positions and IYK holds 54), based on each fund's latest SEC-reported holdings.
Is it redundant to own both COWZ and IYK?
The two portfolios are 13.2% identical by weight. Owning both is not redundant. Most of each portfolio is distinct, so the funds can serve different roles.
What are the biggest shared holdings of COWZ and IYK?
The largest positions held by both funds are MO, CVS, MCK, ADM and CL. Together the top 10 shared positions account for 97% of the total overlap.
What does COWZ own that IYK doesn't?
89 positions (86.4% of COWZ) are unique to COWZ, led by QCOM, COP and BMY. In the other direction, 43 positions (72.5% of IYK) are unique to IYK.