COWZ vs JQUA: Holdings Overlap
COWZPacer US Cash Cows 100 ETF
Pacer · 100 holdings · $18.8B · as of 2026-04-30
JQUAJPMorgan U.S. Quality Factor ETF
JPMorgan · 289 holdings · $8.2B · as of 2026-04-30
How similar are COWZ and JQUA?
Pacer US Cash Cows 100 ETF (COWZ, by Pacer) holds 100 positions; JPMorgan U.S. Quality Factor ETF (JQUA, by JPMorgan) holds 289. They have 50 holdings in common, and by portfolio weight the two funds are 13.9% identical. In practical terms the pair is lightly overlapping, with most of each portfolio distinct.
- Overlap by Weight
- 13.9%Sum of the smaller weight of each shared holding
- Shared Holdings
- 50COWZ holds 100 · JQUA holds 289
- Weight in Shared Holdings
- COWZ 49%·JQUA 14%Share of each fund's weight in stocks both funds own
Based on each fund's latest official holdings. How is this calculated?
What makes each fund different
Only in COWZ
50 of 100 positions (51.2% of the fund) are not held by JQUA. Showing the top 30 by weight.
Sector Breakdown
| Sector | COWZ | JQUA |
|---|---|---|
| Information Technology | 19.4% | 37.8% |
| Health Care | 21.0% | 8.5% |
| Energy | 16.4% | 3.7% |
| Financials | 0.0% | 12.4% |
| Industrials | 11.7% | 10.0% |
| Other Sectors | 31.4% | 27.5% |
Share of each fund's portfolio weight by GICS-style sector, compiled from issuer fund data and our own classification of the holdings, not the issuers' published sector charts.
Performance
| Fund | 1M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y (ann.) | 5Y (ann.) | 10Y (ann.) | Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| COWZ | +7.8% | +15.6% | +28.0% | +12.8% | +11.6% | — | 1.79% |
| JQUA | +3.6% | +18.6% | +24.4% | +19.8% | +13.4% | — | 1.05% |
Total returns including dividends, from adjusted daily closes as of 2026-08-07. 3Y/5Y/10Y are annualized. Yield is trailing-12-month distributions over the last close. Past performance does not predict future results.
Project the growth of $10,000 in COWZ vs JQUA →
Shared Holdings(50)
The top 10 shared positions account for 37% of the overlap, led by QCOM, GILD and CRM.
2.67% | 0.79% | 0.79% | |
1.83% | 0.63% | 0.63% | |
1.76% | 0.55% | 0.55% | |
2.20% | 0.53% | 0.53% | |
2.03% | 0.49% | 0.49% | |
1.87% | 0.46% | 0.46% | |
0.84% | 0.45% | 0.45% | |
1.75% | 0.45% | 0.45% | |
1.68% | 0.41% | 0.41% | |
2.17% | 0.38% | 0.38% | |
1.10% | 0.37% | 0.37% | |
0.55% | 0.36% | 0.36% | |
1.63% | 0.35% | 0.35% | |
1.30% | 0.35% | 0.35% | |
0.72% | 0.31% | 0.31% | |
1.17% | 0.31% | 0.31% | |
1.23% | 0.30% | 0.30% | |
0.41% | 0.30% | 0.30% | |
1.62% | 0.28% | 0.28% | |
0.39% | 0.27% | 0.27% | |
0.59% | 0.27% | 0.27% | |
0.58% | 0.27% | 0.27% | |
0.80% | 0.26% | 0.26% | |
0.36% | 0.26% | 0.26% | |
0.64% | 0.26% | 0.26% |
Frequently Asked Questions
How much do COWZ and JQUA overlap?
COWZ and JQUA overlap by 13.9% of portfolio weight. They share 50 holdings (COWZ holds 100 positions and JQUA holds 289), based on each fund's latest SEC-reported holdings.
Is it redundant to own both COWZ and JQUA?
The two portfolios are 13.9% identical by weight. Owning both is not redundant. Most of each portfolio is distinct, so the funds can serve different roles.
What are the biggest shared holdings of COWZ and JQUA?
The largest positions held by both funds are QCOM, GILD, CRM, MO and BMY. Together the top 10 shared positions account for 37% of the total overlap.
What does COWZ own that JQUA doesn't?
50 positions (51.2% of COWZ) are unique to COWZ, led by CVS, F and UBER. In the other direction, 239 positions (86.0% of JQUA) are unique to JQUA.