COWZ vs LMBS: Holdings Overlap
COWZPacer US Cash Cows 100 ETF
Pacer · 100 holdings · $18.8B · as of 2026-04-30
LMBSFirst Trust Low Duration Opportunities ETF
First Trust · 1146 holdings · $6.4B · as of 2026-04-30
How similar are COWZ and LMBS?
Pacer US Cash Cows 100 ETF (COWZ, by Pacer) holds 100 positions; First Trust Low Duration Opportunities ETF (LMBS, by First Trust) holds 1146. They have 0 holdings in common, and by portfolio weight the two funds are 0.0% identical. In practical terms the pair is essentially distinct, holding almost none of the same securities.
- Overlap by Weight
- 0.0%Sum of the smaller weight of each shared holding
- Shared Holdings
- 0COWZ holds 100 · LMBS holds 1146
- Weight in Shared Holdings
- COWZ 0%·LMBS 0%Share of each fund's weight in stocks both funds own
Based on each fund's latest official holdings. How is this calculated?
What makes each fund different
Only in COWZ
100 of 100 positions (99.8% of the fund) are not held by LMBS. Showing the top 30 by weight.
Only in LMBS
1146 of 1146 positions (106.5% of the fund) are not held by COWZ. Showing the top 30 by weight.
- FR SL25331.72%
- FNMA/FHLMC UMBS, Single Family, 30 Year1.54%
- FNMA-30YR1.33%
- B 0 05/12/261.22%
- FN FM30031.05%
- B 0 05/07/260.97%
Performance
| Fund | 1M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y (ann.) | 5Y (ann.) | 10Y (ann.) | Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| COWZ | +7.8% | +15.6% | +28.0% | +12.8% | +11.6% | — | 1.79% |
| LMBS | +0.4% | +1.7% | +4.5% | +5.8% | +3.2% | +2.6% | 4.11% |
Total returns including dividends, from adjusted daily closes as of 2026-08-07. 3Y/5Y/10Y are annualized. Yield is trailing-12-month distributions over the last close. Past performance does not predict future results.
Project the growth of $10,000 in COWZ vs LMBS →
Shared Holdings(0)
These two funds have no holdings in common.
Frequently Asked Questions
How much do COWZ and LMBS overlap?
COWZ and LMBS overlap by 0.0% of portfolio weight. They share 0 holdings (COWZ holds 100 positions and LMBS holds 1146), based on each fund's latest SEC-reported holdings.
Is it redundant to own both COWZ and LMBS?
The two portfolios are 0.0% identical by weight. Owning both is genuine diversification: the funds hold almost none of the same securities.
What does COWZ own that LMBS doesn't?
100 positions (99.8% of COWZ) are unique to COWZ, led by QCOM, MO and COP. In the other direction, 1146 positions (106.5% of LMBS) are unique to LMBS.