COWZ vs MOAT: Holdings Overlap
COWZPacer US Cash Cows 100 ETF
Pacer · 100 holdings · $18.8B · as of 2026-04-30
MOATVanEck Morningstar Wide Moat ETF
VanEck · 57 holdings · $12.2B · as of 2026-03-31
Holdings snapshots are 30 days apart (COWZ: 2026-04-30, MOAT: 2026-03-31). Weights and index membership change between snapshots, so the true current overlap is typically higher than shown. For funds tracking the same index, the gap can be 5–15 points.
How similar are COWZ and MOAT?
Pacer US Cash Cows 100 ETF (COWZ, by Pacer) holds 100 positions; VanEck Morningstar Wide Moat ETF (MOAT, by VanEck) holds 57. They have 10 holdings in common, and by portfolio weight the two funds are 9.5% identical. In practical terms the pair is lightly overlapping, with most of each portfolio distinct.
- Overlap by Weight
- 9.5%Sum of the smaller weight of each shared holding
- Shared Holdings
- 10COWZ holds 100 · MOAT holds 57
- Weight in Shared Holdings
- COWZ 11%·MOAT 17%Share of each fund's weight in stocks both funds own
Based on each fund's latest official holdings. How is this calculated?
What makes each fund different
Only in COWZ
90 of 100 positions (88.5% of the fund) are not held by MOAT. Showing the top 30 by weight.
Sector Breakdown
| Sector | COWZ | MOAT |
|---|---|---|
| Information Technology | 19.4% | 25.5% |
| Health Care | 21.0% | 18.1% |
| Industrials | 11.7% | 19.3% |
| Consumer Staples | 9.6% | 18.3% |
| Energy | 16.4% | 0.0% |
| Other Sectors | 21.8% | 18.7% |
Share of each fund's portfolio weight by GICS-style sector, compiled from issuer fund data and our own classification of the holdings, not the issuers' published sector charts.
Performance
| Fund | 1M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y (ann.) | 5Y (ann.) | 10Y (ann.) | Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| COWZ | +7.8% | +15.6% | +28.0% | +12.8% | +11.6% | — | 1.79% |
| MOAT | +5.9% | +8.4% | +18.6% | +12.6% | +9.4% | +13.9% | 1.25% |
Total returns including dividends, from adjusted daily closes as of 2026-08-07. 3Y/5Y/10Y are annualized. Yield is trailing-12-month distributions over the last close. Past performance does not predict future results.
Project the growth of $10,000 in COWZ vs MOAT →
Shared Holdings(10)
The top 10 shared positions account for 100% of the overlap, led by BMY, ABNB and UPS.
 BMYBristol-Myers Squibb Co | 2.03% | 2.90% | 2.03% |
|---|---|---|---|
 ABNBAirbnb Inc | 1.62% | 2.64% | 1.62% |
 UPSUnited Parcel Service Inc | 1.68% | 1.41% | 1.41% |
 CRMSalesforce Inc | 1.76% | 0.98% | 0.98% |
 ADBEAdobe Inc | 1.75% | 0.96% | 0.96% |
 WDAYWorkday Inc | 0.75% | 0.80% | 0.75% |
 STZConstellation Brands Inc | 0.63% | 2.74% | 0.63% |
 CPRTCopart Inc | 0.41% | 1.19% | 0.41% |
 VEEVVeeva Systems Inc | 0.36% | 1.21% | 0.36% |
 ZBHZimmer Biomet Holdings Inc | 0.32% | 2.62% | 0.32% |
Frequently Asked Questions
How much do COWZ and MOAT overlap?
COWZ and MOAT overlap by 9.5% of portfolio weight. They share 10 holdings (COWZ holds 100 positions and MOAT holds 57), based on each fund's latest SEC-reported holdings.
Is it redundant to own both COWZ and MOAT?
The two portfolios are 9.5% identical by weight. Owning both is not redundant. Most of each portfolio is distinct, so the funds can serve different roles.
What are the biggest shared holdings of COWZ and MOAT?
The largest positions held by both funds are BMY, ABNB, UPS, CRM and ADBE. Together the top 10 shared positions account for 100% of the total overlap.
What does COWZ own that MOAT doesn't?
90 positions (88.5% of COWZ) are unique to COWZ, led by QCOM, MO and COP. In the other direction, 47 positions (82.4% of MOAT) are unique to MOAT.