COWZ vs PRF: Holdings Overlap
COWZPacer US Cash Cows 100 ETF
Pacer · 100 holdings · $18.8B · as of 2026-04-30
Invesco · 1003 holdings · $10.0B · as of 2026-04-30
How similar are COWZ and PRF?
Pacer US Cash Cows 100 ETF (COWZ, by Pacer) holds 100 positions; Invesco RAFI US 1000 ETF (PRF, by Invesco) holds 1003. They have 99 holdings in common, and by portfolio weight the two funds are 14.6% identical. In practical terms the pair is lightly overlapping, with most of each portfolio distinct.
- Overlap by Weight
- 14.6%Sum of the smaller weight of each shared holding
- Shared Holdings
- 99COWZ holds 100 · PRF holds 1003
- Weight in Shared Holdings
- COWZ 100%·PRF 15%Share of each fund's weight in stocks both funds own
Based on each fund's latest official holdings. How is this calculated?
What makes each fund different
Only in COWZ
1 of 100 positions (0.3% of the fund) are not held by PRF.
LULULululemon Athletica Inc0.30%
Sector Breakdown
| Sector | COWZ | PRF |
|---|---|---|
| Health Care | 21.0% | 11.7% |
| Information Technology | 19.4% | 20.1% |
| Energy | 16.4% | 8.2% |
| Financials | 0.0% | 16.1% |
| Industrials | 11.7% | 9.5% |
| Other Sectors | 31.4% | 34.4% |
Share of each fund's portfolio weight by GICS-style sector, compiled from issuer fund data and our own classification of the holdings, not the issuers' published sector charts.
Performance
| Fund | 1M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y (ann.) | 5Y (ann.) | 10Y (ann.) | Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| COWZ | +7.8% | +15.6% | +28.0% | +12.8% | +11.6% | — | 1.79% |
| PRF | +2.9% | +20.0% | +33.4% | +20.5% | +13.5% | +13.8% | 1.33% |
Total returns including dividends, from adjusted daily closes as of 2026-08-07. 3Y/5Y/10Y are annualized. Yield is trailing-12-month distributions over the last close. Past performance does not predict future results.
Project the growth of $10,000 in COWZ vs PRF →
Shared Holdings(99)
The top 10 shared positions account for 41% of the overlap, led by PFE, VZ and T.
1.99% | 0.82% | 0.82% | |
1.90% | 0.78% | 0.78% | |
1.84% | 0.76% | 0.76% | |
2.17% | 0.62% | 0.62% | |
2.03% | 0.62% | 0.62% | |
1.47% | 0.54% | 0.54% | |
2.16% | 0.53% | 0.53% | |
1.71% | 0.49% | 0.49% | |
2.67% | 0.44% | 0.44% | |
2.01% | 0.42% | 0.42% | |
1.78% | 0.41% | 0.41% | |
1.07% | 0.35% | 0.35% | |
1.83% | 0.35% | 0.35% | |
1.23% | 0.28% | 0.28% | |
1.68% | 0.26% | 0.26% | |
2.20% | 0.26% | 0.26% | |
1.83% | 0.23% | 0.23% | |
1.68% | 0.22% | 0.22% | |
1.76% | 0.21% | 0.21% | |
1.55% | 0.20% | 0.20% | |
1.17% | 0.19% | 0.19% | |
1.93% | 0.18% | 0.18% | |
1.75% | 0.18% | 0.18% | |
1.09% | 0.18% | 0.18% | |
1.53% | 0.16% | 0.16% |
Frequently Asked Questions
How much do COWZ and PRF overlap?
COWZ and PRF overlap by 14.6% of portfolio weight. They share 99 holdings (COWZ holds 100 positions and PRF holds 1003), based on each fund's latest SEC-reported holdings.
Is it redundant to own both COWZ and PRF?
The two portfolios are 14.6% identical by weight. Owning both is not redundant. Most of each portfolio is distinct, so the funds can serve different roles.
What are the biggest shared holdings of COWZ and PRF?
The largest positions held by both funds are PFE, VZ, T, COP and BMY. Together the top 10 shared positions account for 41% of the total overlap.
What does COWZ own that PRF doesn't?
1 positions (0.3% of COWZ) are unique to COWZ, led by LULU. In the other direction, 904 positions (85.4% of PRF) are unique to PRF.