COWZ vs QUAL: Holdings Overlap
COWZPacer US Cash Cows 100 ETF
Pacer · 100 holdings · $18.8B · as of 2026-04-30
QUALiShares MSCI USA Quality Factor ETF
iShares · 121 holdings · $47.8B · as of 2026-04-30
How similar are COWZ and QUAL?
Pacer US Cash Cows 100 ETF (COWZ, by Pacer) holds 100 positions; iShares MSCI USA Quality Factor ETF (QUAL, by iShares) holds 121. They have 23 holdings in common, and by portfolio weight the two funds are 11.7% identical. In practical terms the pair is lightly overlapping, with most of each portfolio distinct.
- Overlap by Weight
- 11.7%Sum of the smaller weight of each shared holding
- Shared Holdings
- 23COWZ holds 100 · QUAL holds 121
- Weight in Shared Holdings
- COWZ 22%·QUAL 12%Share of each fund's weight in stocks both funds own
Based on each fund's latest official holdings. How is this calculated?
What makes each fund different
Only in COWZ
77 of 100 positions (77.5% of the fund) are not held by QUAL. Showing the top 30 by weight.
Sector Breakdown
| Sector | COWZ | QUAL |
|---|---|---|
| Information Technology | 19.4% | 34.4% |
| Health Care | 21.0% | 9.0% |
| Energy | 16.4% | 4.0% |
| Industrials | 11.7% | 9.4% |
| Financials | 0.0% | 11.6% |
| Other Sectors | 31.4% | 31.4% |
Share of each fund's portfolio weight by GICS-style sector, compiled from issuer fund data and our own classification of the holdings, not the issuers' published sector charts.
Performance
| Fund | 1M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y (ann.) | 5Y (ann.) | 10Y (ann.) | Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| COWZ | +7.8% | +15.6% | +28.0% | +12.8% | +11.6% | — | 1.79% |
| QUAL | +3.6% | +14.1% | +23.7% | +19.0% | +11.5% | +14.4% | 0.84% |
Total returns including dividends, from adjusted daily closes as of 2026-08-07. 3Y/5Y/10Y are annualized. Yield is trailing-12-month distributions over the last close. Past performance does not predict future results.
Project the growth of $10,000 in COWZ vs QUAL →
Shared Holdings(23)
The top 10 shared positions account for 76% of the overlap, led by SLB, QCOM and ADBE.
1.83% | 1.56% | 1.56% | |
2.67% | 1.41% | 1.41% | |
1.75% | 1.19% | 1.19% | |
1.30% | 0.88% | 0.88% | |
1.68% | 0.83% | 0.83% | |
1.21% | 0.76% | 0.76% | |
1.98% | 0.66% | 0.66% | |
0.69% | 0.59% | 0.59% | |
1.09% | 0.51% | 0.51% | |
0.58% | 0.50% | 0.50% | |
1.93% | 0.42% | 0.42% | |
0.72% | 0.36% | 0.36% | |
0.35% | 0.59% | 0.35% | |
0.33% | 0.42% | 0.33% | |
0.30% | 0.38% | 0.30% | |
0.58% | 0.22% | 0.22% | |
0.59% | 0.17% | 0.17% | |
0.32% | 0.16% | 0.16% | |
0.32% | 0.13% | 0.13% | |
0.50% | 0.12% | 0.12% | |
0.41% | 0.09% | 0.09% | |
0.36% | 0.08% | 0.08% | |
0.84% | 0.05% | 0.05% |
Frequently Asked Questions
How much do COWZ and QUAL overlap?
COWZ and QUAL overlap by 11.7% of portfolio weight. They share 23 holdings (COWZ holds 100 positions and QUAL holds 121), based on each fund's latest SEC-reported holdings.
Is it redundant to own both COWZ and QUAL?
The two portfolios are 11.7% identical by weight. Owning both is not redundant. Most of each portfolio is distinct, so the funds can serve different roles.
What are the biggest shared holdings of COWZ and QUAL?
The largest positions held by both funds are SLB, QCOM, ADBE, ADP and ACN. Together the top 10 shared positions account for 76% of the total overlap.
What does COWZ own that QUAL doesn't?
77 positions (77.5% of COWZ) are unique to COWZ, led by MO, COP and CVS. In the other direction, 98 positions (87.8% of QUAL) are unique to QUAL.