COWZ vs RSP: Holdings Overlap
COWZPacer US Cash Cows 100 ETF
Pacer · 100 holdings · $18.8B · as of 2026-04-30
RSPInvesco S&P 500 Equal Weight ETF
Invesco · 504 holdings · $97.5B · as of 2026-04-30
How similar are COWZ and RSP?
Pacer US Cash Cows 100 ETF (COWZ, by Pacer) holds 100 positions; Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight ETF (RSP, by Invesco) holds 504. They have 91 holdings in common, and by portfolio weight the two funds are 17.7% identical. In practical terms the pair is lightly overlapping, with most of each portfolio distinct.
- Overlap by Weight
- 17.7%Sum of the smaller weight of each shared holding
- Shared Holdings
- 91COWZ holds 100 · RSP holds 504
- Weight in Shared Holdings
- COWZ 95%·RSP 18%Share of each fund's weight in stocks both funds own
Based on each fund's latest official holdings. How is this calculated?
What makes each fund different
Only in COWZ
9 of 100 positions (4.5% of the fund) are not held by RSP.
Sector Breakdown
| Sector | COWZ | RSP |
|---|---|---|
| Health Care | 21.0% | 10.9% |
| Information Technology | 19.4% | 15.9% |
| Energy | 16.4% | 4.5% |
| Industrials | 11.7% | 15.5% |
| Financials | 0.0% | 15.5% |
| Other Sectors | 31.4% | 37.2% |
Share of each fund's portfolio weight by GICS-style sector, compiled from issuer fund data and our own classification of the holdings, not the issuers' published sector charts.
Performance
| Fund | 1M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y (ann.) | 5Y (ann.) | 10Y (ann.) | Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| COWZ | +7.8% | +15.6% | +28.0% | +12.8% | +11.6% | — | 1.79% |
| RSP | +2.5% | +15.8% | +22.4% | +14.8% | +9.2% | +12.0% | 1.46% |
Total returns including dividends, from adjusted daily closes as of 2026-08-07. 3Y/5Y/10Y are annualized. Yield is trailing-12-month distributions over the last close. Past performance does not predict future results.
Project the growth of $10,000 in COWZ vs RSP →
Shared Holdings(91)
The top 10 shared positions account for 14% of the overlap, led by ON, QCOM and JBL.
0.84% | 0.33% | 0.33% | |
2.67% | 0.26% | 0.26% | |
0.55% | 0.25% | 0.25% | |
0.37% | 0.23% | 0.23% | |
1.83% | 0.23% | 0.23% | |
0.69% | 0.23% | 0.23% | |
1.98% | 0.22% | 0.22% | |
0.40% | 0.22% | 0.22% | |
1.47% | 0.22% | 0.22% | |
0.63% | 0.22% | 0.22% | |
0.39% | 0.22% | 0.22% | |
0.59% | 0.22% | 0.22% | |
1.09% | 0.22% | 0.22% | |
1.02% | 0.22% | 0.22% | |
0.32% | 0.21% | 0.21% | |
2.16% | 0.21% | 0.21% | |
2.20% | 0.21% | 0.21% | |
1.78% | 0.21% | 0.21% | |
1.47% | 0.21% | 0.21% | |
1.07% | 0.21% | 0.21% | |
1.53% | 0.21% | 0.21% | |
1.21% | 0.21% | 0.21% | |
1.68% | 0.21% | 0.21% | |
1.03% | 0.21% | 0.21% | |
2.17% | 0.21% | 0.21% |
Frequently Asked Questions
How much do COWZ and RSP overlap?
COWZ and RSP overlap by 17.7% of portfolio weight. They share 91 holdings (COWZ holds 100 positions and RSP holds 504), based on each fund's latest SEC-reported holdings.
Is it redundant to own both COWZ and RSP?
The two portfolios are 17.7% identical by weight. Owning both is not redundant. Most of each portfolio is distinct, so the funds can serve different roles.
What are the biggest shared holdings of COWZ and RSP?
The largest positions held by both funds are ON, QCOM, JBL, JBHT and SLB. Together the top 10 shared positions account for 14% of the total overlap.
What does COWZ own that RSP doesn't?
9 positions (4.5% of COWZ) are unique to COWZ, led by ZM, THC and FLEX. In the other direction, 413 positions (81.8% of RSP) are unique to RSP.