COWZ vs RSPH: Holdings Overlap
COWZPacer US Cash Cows 100 ETF
Pacer · 100 holdings · $18.8B · as of 2026-04-30
RSPHInvesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Health Care ETF
Invesco · 59 holdings · $776M · as of 2026-04-30
How similar are COWZ and RSPH?
Pacer US Cash Cows 100 ETF (COWZ, by Pacer) holds 100 positions; Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Health Care ETF (RSPH, by Invesco) holds 59. They have 17 holdings in common, and by portfolio weight the two funds are 17.9% identical. In practical terms the pair is lightly overlapping, with most of each portfolio distinct.
- Overlap by Weight
- 17.9%Sum of the smaller weight of each shared holding
- Shared Holdings
- 17COWZ holds 100 · RSPH holds 59
- Weight in Shared Holdings
- COWZ 19%·RSPH 29%Share of each fund's weight in stocks both funds own
Based on each fund's latest official holdings. How is this calculated?
What makes each fund different
Only in COWZ
83 of 100 positions (80.5% of the fund) are not held by RSPH. Showing the top 30 by weight.
Sector Breakdown
| Sector | COWZ | RSPH |
|---|---|---|
| Health Care | 21.0% | 100.5% |
| Information Technology | 19.4% | 0.0% |
| Energy | 16.4% | 0.0% |
| Industrials | 11.7% | 0.0% |
| Consumer Discretionary | 9.8% | 0.0% |
| Other Sectors | 21.5% | 0.0% |
Share of each fund's portfolio weight by GICS-style sector, compiled from issuer fund data and our own classification of the holdings, not the issuers' published sector charts.
Performance
| Fund | 1M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y (ann.) | 5Y (ann.) | 10Y (ann.) | Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| COWZ | +7.8% | +15.6% | +28.0% | +12.8% | +11.6% | — | 1.79% |
| RSPH | +3.0% | +12.0% | +28.4% | +7.0% | +3.5% | +8.9% | 0.65% |
Total returns including dividends, from adjusted daily closes as of 2026-08-07. 3Y/5Y/10Y are annualized. Yield is trailing-12-month distributions over the last close. Past performance does not predict future results.
Project the growth of $10,000 in COWZ vs RSPH →
Shared Holdings(17)
The top 10 shared positions account for 81% of the overlap, led by CVS, BMY and PFE.
 CVSCVS Health Corp. | 2.16% | 1.96% | 1.96% |
|---|---|---|---|
 BMYBristol-Myers Squibb Co. | 2.03% | 1.80% | 1.80% |
 PFEPfizer Inc. | 1.99% | 1.74% | 1.74% |
 GILDGilead Sciences, Inc. | 1.83% | 1.59% | 1.59% |
 CAHCardinal Health, Inc. | 1.62% | 1.59% | 1.59% |
 MCKMcKesson Corp. | 1.79% | 1.55% | 1.55% |
 HCAHCA Healthcare, Inc. | 1.64% | 1.44% | 1.44% |
 REGNRegeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc. | 1.17% | 1.62% | 1.17% |
 CORCencora, Inc. | 1.03% | 1.56% | 1.03% |
 BIIBBiogen Inc. | 0.67% | 1.77% | 0.67% |
 VTRSViatris Inc. | 0.65% | 1.90% | 0.65% |
 IQVIQVIA Holdings Inc. | 0.62% | 1.64% | 0.62% |
 RMDResMed Inc. | 0.50% | 1.58% | 0.50% |
 DGXQuest Diagnostics Inc. | 0.44% | 1.72% | 0.44% |
 INCYIncyte Corp. | 0.44% | 1.79% | 0.44% |
 LHLabcorp Holdings Inc. | 0.38% | 1.69% | 0.38% |
 ZBHZimmer Biomet Holdings, Inc. | 0.32% | 1.56% | 0.32% |
Frequently Asked Questions
How much do COWZ and RSPH overlap?
COWZ and RSPH overlap by 17.9% of portfolio weight. They share 17 holdings (COWZ holds 100 positions and RSPH holds 59), based on each fund's latest SEC-reported holdings.
Is it redundant to own both COWZ and RSPH?
The two portfolios are 17.9% identical by weight. Owning both is not redundant. Most of each portfolio is distinct, so the funds can serve different roles.
What are the biggest shared holdings of COWZ and RSPH?
The largest positions held by both funds are CVS, BMY, PFE, GILD and CAH. Together the top 10 shared positions account for 81% of the total overlap.
What does COWZ own that RSPH doesn't?
83 positions (80.5% of COWZ) are unique to COWZ, led by QCOM, MO and COP. In the other direction, 42 positions (72.0% of RSPH) are unique to RSPH.