COWZ vs SCHV: Holdings Overlap
COWZPacer US Cash Cows 100 ETF
Pacer · 100 holdings · $18.8B · as of 2026-04-30
SCHVSchwab U.S. Large-Cap Value ETF
Schwab · 555 holdings · $16.1B · as of 2026-05-31
Holdings snapshots are 31 days apart (COWZ: 2026-04-30, SCHV: 2026-05-31). Weights and index membership change between snapshots, so the true current overlap is typically higher than shown. For funds tracking the same index, the gap can be 5–15 points.
How similar are COWZ and SCHV?
Pacer US Cash Cows 100 ETF (COWZ, by Pacer) holds 100 positions; Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Value ETF (SCHV, by Schwab) holds 555. They have 79 holdings in common, and by portfolio weight the two funds are 13.4% identical. In practical terms the pair is lightly overlapping, with most of each portfolio distinct.
- Overlap by Weight
- 13.4%Sum of the smaller weight of each shared holding
- Shared Holdings
- 79COWZ holds 100 · SCHV holds 555
- Weight in Shared Holdings
- COWZ 78%·SCHV 13%Share of each fund's weight in stocks both funds own
Based on each fund's latest official holdings. How is this calculated?
What makes each fund different
Only in COWZ
21 of 100 positions (22.0% of the fund) are not held by SCHV.
Sector Breakdown
| Sector | COWZ | SCHV |
|---|---|---|
| Information Technology | 19.4% | 21.3% |
| Health Care | 21.0% | 10.8% |
| Financials | 0.0% | 18.9% |
| Energy | 16.4% | 6.4% |
| Industrials | 11.7% | 14.0% |
| Other Sectors | 31.4% | 28.3% |
Share of each fund's portfolio weight by GICS-style sector, compiled from issuer fund data and our own classification of the holdings, not the issuers' published sector charts.
Performance
| Fund | 1M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y (ann.) | 5Y (ann.) | 10Y (ann.) | Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| COWZ | +7.8% | +15.6% | +28.0% | +12.8% | +11.6% | — | 1.79% |
| SCHV | +1.5% | +18.8% | +27.7% | +17.6% | +10.9% | +11.4% | 1.75% |
Total returns including dividends, from adjusted daily closes as of 2026-08-07. 3Y/5Y/10Y are annualized. Yield is trailing-12-month distributions over the last close. Past performance does not predict future results.
Project the growth of $10,000 in COWZ vs SCHV →
Shared Holdings(79)
The top 10 shared positions account for 38% of the overlap, led by QCOM, VZ and T.
2.67% | 0.87% | 0.87% | |
1.90% | 0.65% | 0.65% | |
1.84% | 0.56% | 0.56% | |
1.83% | 0.54% | 0.54% | |
1.99% | 0.48% | 0.48% | |
2.17% | 0.45% | 0.45% | |
1.93% | 0.39% | 0.39% | |
2.20% | 0.38% | 0.38% | |
2.03% | 0.38% | 0.38% | |
2.16% | 0.38% | 0.38% | |
1.68% | 0.37% | 0.37% | |
1.30% | 0.29% | 0.29% | |
1.71% | 0.29% | 0.29% | |
1.83% | 0.26% | 0.26% | |
1.68% | 0.26% | 0.26% | |
1.47% | 0.24% | 0.24% | |
1.78% | 0.24% | 0.24% | |
1.10% | 0.24% | 0.24% | |
1.23% | 0.23% | 0.23% | |
2.01% | 0.22% | 0.22% | |
1.64% | 0.19% | 0.19% | |
0.99% | 0.19% | 0.19% | |
1.07% | 0.19% | 0.19% | |
0.59% | 0.18% | 0.18% | |
1.47% | 0.17% | 0.17% |
Frequently Asked Questions
How much do COWZ and SCHV overlap?
COWZ and SCHV overlap by 13.4% of portfolio weight. They share 79 holdings (COWZ holds 100 positions and SCHV holds 555), based on each fund's latest SEC-reported holdings.
Is it redundant to own both COWZ and SCHV?
The two portfolios are 13.4% identical by weight. Owning both is not redundant. Most of each portfolio is distinct, so the funds can serve different roles.
What are the biggest shared holdings of COWZ and SCHV?
The largest positions held by both funds are QCOM, VZ, T, GILD and PFE. Together the top 10 shared positions account for 38% of the total overlap.
What does COWZ own that SCHV doesn't?
21 positions (22.0% of COWZ) are unique to COWZ, led by UBER, BKNG and MCK. In the other direction, 476 positions (86.4% of SCHV) are unique to SCHV.