COWZ vs SPYG: Holdings Overlap
COWZPacer US Cash Cows 100 ETF
Pacer · 100 holdings · $18.8B · as of 2026-04-30
SPYGState Street® SPDR® Portfolio S&P 500® Growth ETF
State Street (SPDR) · 147 holdings · $54.7B · as of 2026-08-06
Holdings snapshots are 98 days apart (COWZ: 2026-04-30, SPYG: 2026-08-06). Weights and index membership change between snapshots, so the true current overlap is typically higher than shown. For funds tracking the same index, the gap can be 5–15 points.
How similar are COWZ and SPYG?
Pacer US Cash Cows 100 ETF (COWZ, by Pacer) holds 100 positions; State Street® SPDR® Portfolio S&P 500® Growth ETF (SPYG, by State Street (SPDR)) holds 147. They have 18 holdings in common, and by portfolio weight the two funds are 2.6% identical. In practical terms the pair is essentially distinct, holding almost none of the same securities.
- Overlap by Weight
- 2.6%Sum of the smaller weight of each shared holding
- Shared Holdings
- 18COWZ holds 100 · SPYG holds 147
- Weight in Shared Holdings
- COWZ 19%·SPYG 3%Share of each fund's weight in stocks both funds own
Based on each fund's latest official holdings. How is this calculated?
What makes each fund different
Only in COWZ
82 of 100 positions (81.0% of the fund) are not held by SPYG. Showing the top 30 by weight.
Sector Breakdown
| Sector | COWZ | SPYG |
|---|---|---|
| Information Technology | 19.4% | 52.5% |
| Health Care | 21.0% | 6.1% |
| Energy | 16.4% | 0.0% |
| Communication Services | 8.1% | 15.3% |
| Industrials | 11.7% | 6.4% |
| Other Sectors | 23.3% | 19.7% |
Share of each fund's portfolio weight by GICS-style sector, compiled from issuer fund data and our own classification of the holdings, not the issuers' published sector charts.
Performance
| Fund | 1M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y (ann.) | 5Y (ann.) | 10Y (ann.) | Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| COWZ | +7.8% | +15.6% | +28.0% | +12.8% | +11.6% | — | 1.79% |
| SPYG | +4.4% | +15.6% | +25.4% | +26.9% | +14.2% | +17.9% | 0.47% |
Total returns including dividends, from adjusted daily closes as of 2026-08-07. 3Y/5Y/10Y are annualized. Yield is trailing-12-month distributions over the last close. Past performance does not predict future results.
Project the growth of $10,000 in COWZ vs SPYG →
Shared Holdings(18)
The top 10 shared positions account for 81% of the overlap, led by BKNG, UBER and NEM.
1.87% | 0.44% | 0.44% | |
2.00% | 0.39% | 0.39% | |
1.93% | 0.31% | 0.31% | |
1.83% | 0.24% | 0.24% | |
1.64% | 0.17% | 0.17% | |
1.63% | 0.14% | 0.14% | |
0.59% | 0.12% | 0.12% | |
1.03% | 0.10% | 0.10% | |
0.55% | 0.09% | 0.09% | |
1.62% | 0.08% | 0.08% | |
0.72% | 0.08% | 0.08% | |
0.42% | 0.07% | 0.07% | |
0.39% | 0.07% | 0.07% | |
0.55% | 0.06% | 0.06% | |
0.36% | 0.06% | 0.06% | |
0.44% | 0.05% | 0.05% | |
0.50% | 0.05% | 0.05% | |
0.75% | 0.04% | 0.04% |
Frequently Asked Questions
How much do COWZ and SPYG overlap?
COWZ and SPYG overlap by 2.6% of portfolio weight. They share 18 holdings (COWZ holds 100 positions and SPYG holds 147), based on each fund's latest SEC-reported holdings.
Is it redundant to own both COWZ and SPYG?
The two portfolios are 2.6% identical by weight. Owning both is genuine diversification: the funds hold almost none of the same securities.
What are the biggest shared holdings of COWZ and SPYG?
The largest positions held by both funds are BKNG, UBER, NEM, GILD and HCA. Together the top 10 shared positions account for 81% of the total overlap.
What does COWZ own that SPYG doesn't?
82 positions (81.0% of COWZ) are unique to COWZ, led by QCOM, MO and COP. In the other direction, 129 positions (97.4% of SPYG) are unique to SPYG.