COWZ vs VFLO: Holdings Overlap
COWZPacer US Cash Cows 100 ETF
Pacer · 100 holdings · $18.8B · as of 2026-04-30
VFLOVictoryShares Free Cash Flow ETF
VictoryShares · 50 holdings · $9.6B · as of 2026-03-31
Holdings snapshots are 30 days apart (COWZ: 2026-04-30, VFLO: 2026-03-31). Weights and index membership change between snapshots, so the true current overlap is typically higher than shown. For funds tracking the same index, the gap can be 5–15 points.
How similar are COWZ and VFLO?
Pacer US Cash Cows 100 ETF (COWZ, by Pacer) holds 100 positions; VictoryShares Free Cash Flow ETF (VFLO, by VictoryShares) holds 50. They have 31 holdings in common, and by portfolio weight the two funds are 31.0% identical. In practical terms the pair is moderately overlapping; they share a meaningful core, but each fund adds distinct exposure.
- Overlap by Weight
- 31.0%Sum of the smaller weight of each shared holding
- Shared Holdings
- 31COWZ holds 100 · VFLO holds 50
- Weight in Shared Holdings
- COWZ 31%·VFLO 63%Share of each fund's weight in stocks both funds own
Based on each fund's latest official holdings. How is this calculated?
What makes each fund different
Only in COWZ
69 of 100 positions (68.8% of the fund) are not held by VFLO. Showing the top 30 by weight.
Sector Breakdown
| Sector | COWZ | VFLO |
|---|---|---|
| Information Technology | 19.4% | 30.0% |
| Health Care | 21.0% | 17.6% |
| Consumer Discretionary | 9.8% | 17.9% |
| Energy | 16.4% | 12.8% |
| Industrials | 11.7% | 10.1% |
| Other Sectors | 21.5% | 11.1% |
Share of each fund's portfolio weight by GICS-style sector, compiled from issuer fund data and our own classification of the holdings, not the issuers' published sector charts.
Performance
| Fund | 1M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y (ann.) | 5Y (ann.) | 10Y (ann.) | Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| COWZ | +7.8% | +15.6% | +28.0% | +12.8% | +11.6% | — | 1.79% |
| VFLO | +8.6% | +31.3% | +51.6% | +26.1% | — | — | 1.09% |
Total returns including dividends, from adjusted daily closes as of 2026-08-07. 3Y/5Y/10Y are annualized. Yield is trailing-12-month distributions over the last close. Past performance does not predict future results.
Project the growth of $10,000 in COWZ vs VFLO →
Shared Holdings(31)
The top 10 shared positions account for 58% of the overlap, led by UBER, FANG and NEM.
2.00% | 2.53% | 2.00% | |
1.98% | 2.39% | 1.98% | |
1.93% | 2.55% | 1.93% | |
1.87% | 2.59% | 1.87% | |
1.83% | 2.00% | 1.83% | |
1.76% | 3.25% | 1.76% | |
1.75% | 3.08% | 1.75% | |
1.68% | 3.27% | 1.68% | |
1.62% | 1.99% | 1.62% | |
1.47% | 2.45% | 1.47% | |
1.30% | 1.73% | 1.30% | |
1.03% | 2.70% | 1.03% | |
0.92% | 1.68% | 0.92% | |
0.84% | 1.48% | 0.84% | |
0.84% | 3.35% | 0.84% | |
0.80% | 2.76% | 0.80% | |
0.75% | 2.02% | 0.75% | |
0.69% | 2.21% | 0.69% | |
0.63% | 2.14% | 0.63% | |
0.63% | 1.57% | 0.63% | |
0.59% | 1.78% | 0.59% | |
0.58% | 1.29% | 0.58% | |
0.52% | 2.33% | 0.52% | |
0.45% | 1.06% | 0.45% | |
0.44% | 2.22% | 0.44% |
Frequently Asked Questions
How much do COWZ and VFLO overlap?
COWZ and VFLO overlap by 31.0% of portfolio weight. They share 31 holdings (COWZ holds 100 positions and VFLO holds 50), based on each fund's latest SEC-reported holdings.
Is it redundant to own both COWZ and VFLO?
The two portfolios are 31.0% identical by weight. Owning both is defensible: they share a meaningful core, but each fund adds exposure the other lacks.
What are the biggest shared holdings of COWZ and VFLO?
The largest positions held by both funds are UBER, FANG, NEM, BKNG and SLB. Together the top 10 shared positions account for 58% of the total overlap.
What does COWZ own that VFLO doesn't?
69 positions (68.8% of COWZ) are unique to COWZ, led by QCOM, MO and COP. In the other direction, 19 positions (36.6% of VFLO) are unique to VFLO.