COWZ vs VTV: Holdings Overlap
COWZPacer US Cash Cows 100 ETF
Pacer · 100 holdings · $18.8B · as of 2026-04-30
Vanguard · 311 holdings · $191.4B · as of 2026-03-31
Holdings snapshots are 30 days apart (COWZ: 2026-04-30, VTV: 2026-03-31). Weights and index membership change between snapshots, so the true current overlap is typically higher than shown. For funds tracking the same index, the gap can be 5–15 points.
How similar are COWZ and VTV?
Pacer US Cash Cows 100 ETF (COWZ, by Pacer) holds 100 positions; Vanguard Value Index Fund (VTV, by Vanguard) holds 311. They have 66 holdings in common, and by portfolio weight the two funds are 15.6% identical. In practical terms the pair is lightly overlapping, with most of each portfolio distinct.
- Overlap by Weight
- 15.6%Sum of the smaller weight of each shared holding
- Shared Holdings
- 66COWZ holds 100 · VTV holds 311
- Weight in Shared Holdings
- COWZ 76%·VTV 16%Share of each fund's weight in stocks both funds own
Based on each fund's latest official holdings. How is this calculated?
What makes each fund different
Only in COWZ
34 of 100 positions (23.5% of the fund) are not held by VTV. Showing the top 30 by weight.
Sector Breakdown
| Sector | COWZ | VTV |
|---|---|---|
| Financials | 0.0% | 21.9% |
| Health Care | 21.0% | 15.3% |
| Information Technology | 19.4% | 9.9% |
| Energy | 16.4% | 8.7% |
| Industrials | 11.7% | 14.4% |
| Other Sectors | 31.4% | 28.6% |
| Unclassified | 0.0% | 0.6% |
Share of each fund's portfolio weight by GICS-style sector, compiled from issuer fund data and our own classification of the holdings, not the issuers' published sector charts. “Unclassified” is weight we could not classify (0% of COWZ, 1% of VTV).
Performance
| Fund | 1M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y (ann.) | 5Y (ann.) | 10Y (ann.) | Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| COWZ | +7.8% | +15.6% | +28.0% | +12.8% | +11.6% | — | 1.79% |
| VTV | +2.2% | +18.7% | +29.5% | +18.0% | +12.5% | +12.6% | 1.82% |
Total returns including dividends, from adjusted daily closes as of 2026-08-07. 3Y/5Y/10Y are annualized. Yield is trailing-12-month distributions over the last close. Past performance does not predict future results.
Project the growth of $10,000 in COWZ vs VTV →
Shared Holdings(66)
The top 10 shared positions account for 39% of the overlap, led by T, VZ and GILD.
1.84% | 0.83% | 0.83% | |
1.90% | 0.78% | 0.78% | |
1.83% | 0.71% | 0.71% | |
2.17% | 0.66% | 0.66% | |
1.99% | 0.65% | 0.65% | |
2.67% | 0.56% | 0.56% | |
2.03% | 0.51% | 0.51% | |
1.68% | 0.50% | 0.50% | |
1.93% | 0.48% | 0.48% | |
2.20% | 0.45% | 0.45% | |
1.79% | 0.43% | 0.43% | |
1.71% | 0.42% | 0.42% | |
2.16% | 0.37% | 0.37% | |
1.76% | 0.34% | 0.34% | |
1.30% | 0.34% | 0.34% | |
1.17% | 0.33% | 0.33% | |
1.23% | 0.32% | 0.32% | |
1.83% | 0.31% | 0.31% | |
1.64% | 0.30% | 0.30% | |
1.47% | 0.30% | 0.30% | |
1.68% | 0.30% | 0.30% | |
1.78% | 0.29% | 0.29% | |
1.10% | 0.28% | 0.28% | |
0.99% | 0.25% | 0.25% | |
1.03% | 0.24% | 0.24% |
Frequently Asked Questions
How much do COWZ and VTV overlap?
COWZ and VTV overlap by 15.6% of portfolio weight. They share 66 holdings (COWZ holds 100 positions and VTV holds 311), based on each fund's latest SEC-reported holdings.
Is it redundant to own both COWZ and VTV?
The two portfolios are 15.6% identical by weight. Owning both is not redundant. Most of each portfolio is distinct, so the funds can serve different roles.
What are the biggest shared holdings of COWZ and VTV?
The largest positions held by both funds are T, VZ, GILD, COP and PFE. Together the top 10 shared positions account for 39% of the total overlap.
What does COWZ own that VTV doesn't?
34 positions (23.5% of COWZ) are unique to COWZ, led by UBER, BKNG and ADBE. In the other direction, 245 positions (83.8% of VTV) are unique to VTV.