CQQQ vs ASHR: Holdings Overlap
CQQQInvesco China Technology ETF
Invesco · 173 holdings · $3.2B · as of 2026-04-30
ASHRXtrackers Harvest CSI 300 China A-Shares ETF
Xtrackers (DWS) · 285 holdings · $1.6B · as of 2026-05-29
How similar are CQQQ and ASHR?
Invesco China Technology ETF (CQQQ, by Invesco) holds 173 positions; Xtrackers Harvest CSI 300 China A-Shares ETF (ASHR, by Xtrackers (DWS)) holds 285. They have 41 holdings in common, and by portfolio weight the two funds are 15.7% identical. In practical terms the pair is lightly overlapping, with most of each portfolio distinct.
- Overlap by Weight
- 15.7%Sum of the smaller weight of each shared holding
- Shared Holdings
- 41CQQQ holds 173 · ASHR holds 285
- Weight in Shared Holdings
- CQQQ 21%·ASHR 17%Share of each fund's weight in stocks both funds own
Based on each fund's latest official holdings. How is this calculated?
What makes each fund different
Only in CQQQ
132 of 173 positions (78.4% of the fund) are not held by ASHR. Showing the top 30 by weight.
Only in ASHR
244 of 285 positions (82.5% of the fund) are not held by CQQQ. Showing the top 30 by weight.
Performance
| Fund | 1M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y (ann.) | 5Y (ann.) | 10Y (ann.) | Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CQQQ | -1.6% | +2.1% | +13.8% | +8.9% | -4.9% | +4.7% | 2.12% |
| ASHR | +0.0% | +6.9% | +24.7% | +9.8% | -0.1% | +5.1% | 2.16% |
Total returns including dividends, from adjusted daily closes as of 2026-08-07. 3Y/5Y/10Y are annualized. Yield is trailing-12-month distributions over the last close. Past performance does not predict future results.
Project the growth of $10,000 in CQQQ vs ASHR →
Shared Holdings(41)
The top 10 shared positions account for 55% of the overlap, led by 688256, 002371 and 688041.
2.59% | 1.56% | 1.56% | |
1.39% | 1.06% | 1.06% | |
2.50% | 1.04% | 1.04% | |
1.03% | 0.85% | 0.85% | |
0.85% | 0.75% | 0.75% | |
0.75% | 1.21% | 0.75% | |
0.72% | 1.14% | 0.72% | |
0.71% | 0.69% | 0.69% | |
0.67% | 0.68% | 0.67% | |
0.59% | 0.70% | 0.59% | |
0.53% | 0.79% | 0.53% | |
0.75% | 0.45% | 0.45% | |
0.40% | 0.47% | 0.40% | |
0.43% | 0.33% | 0.33% | |
0.46% | 0.33% | 0.33% | |
0.32% | 0.37% | 0.32% | |
0.60% | 0.31% | 0.31% | |
0.29% | 0.50% | 0.29% | |
0.37% | 0.28% | 0.28% | |
0.64% | 0.28% | 0.28% | |
0.33% | 0.26% | 0.26% | |
0.42% | 0.24% | 0.24% | |
0.24% | 0.26% | 0.24% | |
0.24% | 0.22% | 0.22% | |
0.37% | 0.22% | 0.22% |
Frequently Asked Questions
How much do CQQQ and ASHR overlap?
CQQQ and ASHR overlap by 15.7% of portfolio weight. They share 41 holdings (CQQQ holds 173 positions and ASHR holds 285), based on each fund's latest SEC-reported holdings.
Is it redundant to own both CQQQ and ASHR?
The two portfolios are 15.7% identical by weight. Owning both is not redundant. Most of each portfolio is distinct, so the funds can serve different roles.
What are the biggest shared holdings of CQQQ and ASHR?
The largest positions held by both funds are 688256, 002371, 688041, 300476 and 688012. Together the top 10 shared positions account for 55% of the total overlap.
What does CQQQ own that ASHR doesn't?
132 positions (78.4% of CQQQ) are unique to CQQQ, led by 3690, PDD and 700. In the other direction, 244 positions (82.5% of ASHR) are unique to ASHR.