CQQQ vs LIT: Holdings Overlap
CQQQInvesco China Technology ETF
Invesco · 173 holdings · $3.2B · as of 2026-04-30
LITGlobal X Lithium and Battery Tech ETF
Global X · 41 holdings · $1.5B · as of 2026-04-30
How similar are CQQQ and LIT?
Invesco China Technology ETF (CQQQ, by Invesco) holds 173 positions; Global X Lithium and Battery Tech ETF (LIT, by Global X) holds 41. They have 1 holdings in common, and by portfolio weight the two funds are 1.4% identical. In practical terms the pair is essentially distinct, holding almost none of the same securities.
- Overlap by Weight
- 1.4%Sum of the smaller weight of each shared holding
- Shared Holdings
- 1CQQQ holds 173 · LIT holds 41
- Weight in Shared Holdings
- CQQQ 1%·LIT 4%Share of each fund's weight in stocks both funds own
Based on each fund's latest official holdings. How is this calculated?
What makes each fund different
Only in CQQQ
172 of 173 positions (98.5% of the fund) are not held by LIT. Showing the top 30 by weight.
Only in LIT
40 of 41 positions (96.2% of the fund) are not held by CQQQ. Showing the top 30 by weight.
Sector Breakdown
| Sector | CQQQ | LIT |
|---|---|---|
| Materials | 0.0% | 41.6% |
| Information Technology | 28.3% | 13.8% |
| Communication Services | 23.3% | 0.0% |
| Consumer Discretionary | 17.1% | 9.6% |
| Industrials | 0.0% | 8.5% |
| Other Sectors | 0.0% | 0.0% |
| Unclassified | 31.3% | 26.3% |
Share of each fund's portfolio weight by GICS-style sector, compiled from issuer fund data and our own classification of the holdings, not the issuers' published sector charts. “Unclassified” is weight we could not classify (31% of CQQQ, 26% of LIT).
Performance
| Fund | 1M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y (ann.) | 5Y (ann.) | 10Y (ann.) | Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CQQQ | -1.6% | +2.1% | +13.8% | +8.9% | -4.9% | +4.7% | 2.12% |
| LIT | +0.3% | +14.6% | +73.8% | +6.5% | -2.3% | +13.0% | 0.68% |
Total returns including dividends, from adjusted daily closes as of 2026-08-07. 3Y/5Y/10Y are annualized. Yield is trailing-12-month distributions over the last close. Past performance does not predict future results.
Project the growth of $10,000 in CQQQ vs LIT →
Shared Holdings(1)
1.39% | 3.70% | 1.39% |
Frequently Asked Questions
How much do CQQQ and LIT overlap?
CQQQ and LIT overlap by 1.4% of portfolio weight. They share 1 holdings (CQQQ holds 173 positions and LIT holds 41), based on each fund's latest SEC-reported holdings.
Is it redundant to own both CQQQ and LIT?
The two portfolios are 1.4% identical by weight. Owning both is genuine diversification: the funds hold almost none of the same securities.
What are the biggest shared holdings of CQQQ and LIT?
The largest positions held by both funds are 002371. Together the top 1 shared positions account for 100% of the total overlap.
What does CQQQ own that LIT doesn't?
172 positions (98.5% of CQQQ) are unique to CQQQ, led by 3690, PDD and 700. In the other direction, 40 positions (96.2% of LIT) are unique to LIT.