DIHP vs EWL: Holdings Overlap
DIHPDimensional International High Profitability ETF
Dimensional · 499 holdings · $6.4B · as of 2026-04-30
EWLiShares MSCI Switzerland ETF
iShares · 42 holdings · $2.2B · as of 2026-05-31
Holdings snapshots are 31 days apart (DIHP: 2026-04-30, EWL: 2026-05-31). Weights and index membership change between snapshots, so the true current overlap is typically higher than shown. For funds tracking the same index, the gap can be 5–15 points.
How similar are DIHP and EWL?
Dimensional International High Profitability ETF (DIHP, by Dimensional) holds 499 positions; iShares MSCI Switzerland ETF (EWL, by iShares) holds 42. They have 11 holdings in common, and by portfolio weight the two funds are 7.0% identical. In practical terms the pair is lightly overlapping, with most of each portfolio distinct.
- Overlap by Weight
- 7.0%Sum of the smaller weight of each shared holding
- Shared Holdings
- 11DIHP holds 499 · EWL holds 42
- Weight in Shared Holdings
- DIHP 7%·EWL 46%Share of each fund's weight in stocks both funds own
Based on each fund's latest official holdings. How is this calculated?
What makes each fund different
Only in DIHP
488 of 499 positions (91.5% of the fund) are not held by EWL. Showing the top 30 by weight.
Only in EWL
31 of 42 positions (52.0% of the fund) are not held by DIHP. Showing the top 30 by weight.
Sector Breakdown
| Sector | DIHP | EWL |
|---|---|---|
| Health Care | 10.3% | 37.9% |
| Industrials | 18.5% | 11.3% |
| Financials | 8.2% | 17.3% |
| Consumer Staples | 7.6% | 14.3% |
| Information Technology | 9.9% | 1.1% |
| Other Sectors | 28.9% | 13.4% |
| Unclassified | 15.2% | 3.2% |
Share of each fund's portfolio weight by GICS-style sector, compiled from issuer fund data and our own classification of the holdings, not the issuers' published sector charts. “Unclassified” is weight we could not classify (15% of DIHP, 3% of EWL).
Performance
| Fund | 1M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y (ann.) | 5Y (ann.) | 10Y (ann.) | Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| DIHP | +4.4% | +13.9% | +24.1% | +15.7% | — | — | 1.86% |
| EWL | +1.7% | +9.5% | +22.3% | +13.4% | +7.3% | +10.1% | 1.69% |
Total returns including dividends, from adjusted daily closes as of 2026-08-07. 3Y/5Y/10Y are annualized. Yield is trailing-12-month distributions over the last close. Past performance does not predict future results.
Project the growth of $10,000 in DIHP vs EWL →
Shared Holdings(11)
The top 10 shared positions account for 100% of the overlap, led by ROP, NESN and GEBN.
2.96% | 14.03% | 2.96% | |
2.20% | 12.34% | 2.20% | |
0.40% | 1.23% | 0.40% | |
0.35% | 1.32% | 0.35% | |
0.29% | 1.10% | 0.29% | |
0.28% | 13.56% | 0.28% | |
0.24% | 1.29% | 0.24% | |
0.17% | 0.76% | 0.17% | |
0.06% | 0.39% | 0.06% | |
| Euro | 0.05% | 0.04% | 0.04% |
| SWISS FRANC | 0.01% | 0.29% | 0.01% |
Frequently Asked Questions
How much do DIHP and EWL overlap?
DIHP and EWL overlap by 7.0% of portfolio weight. They share 11 holdings (DIHP holds 499 positions and EWL holds 42), based on each fund's latest SEC-reported holdings.
Is it redundant to own both DIHP and EWL?
The two portfolios are 7.0% identical by weight. Owning both is not redundant. Most of each portfolio is distinct, so the funds can serve different roles.
What are the biggest shared holdings of DIHP and EWL?
The largest positions held by both funds are ROP, NESN, GEBN, PGHN and SGSN. Together the top 10 shared positions account for 100% of the total overlap.
What does DIHP own that EWL doesn't?
488 positions (91.5% of DIHP) are unique to DIHP, led by ASML, MC and BHP. In the other direction, 31 positions (52.0% of EWL) are unique to EWL.