EFA vs EWL: Holdings Overlap
iShares · 705 holdings · $79.3B · as of 2026-04-30
EWLiShares MSCI Switzerland ETF
iShares · 42 holdings · $2.2B · as of 2026-05-31
Holdings snapshots are 31 days apart (EFA: 2026-04-30, EWL: 2026-05-31). Weights and index membership change between snapshots, so the true current overlap is typically higher than shown. For funds tracking the same index, the gap can be 5–15 points.
How similar are EFA and EWL?
iShares MSCI EAFE ETF (EFA, by iShares) holds 705 positions; iShares MSCI Switzerland ETF (EWL, by iShares) holds 42. They have 42 holdings in common, and by portfolio weight the two funds are 9.2% identical. In practical terms the pair is lightly overlapping, with most of each portfolio distinct.
- Overlap by Weight
- 9.2%Sum of the smaller weight of each shared holding
- Shared Holdings
- 42EFA holds 705 · EWL holds 42
- Weight in Shared Holdings
- EFA 9%·EWL 98%Share of each fund's weight in stocks both funds own
Based on each fund's latest official holdings. How is this calculated?
What makes each fund different
Only in EFA
663 of 705 positions (89.9% of the fund) are not held by EWL. Showing the top 30 by weight.
Only in EWL
Every position in EWL is also held by EFA, so it brings nothing the other fund doesn’t already own.
Sector Breakdown
| Sector | EFA | EWL |
|---|---|---|
| Health Care | 9.7% | 37.9% |
| Financials | 23.8% | 17.3% |
| Industrials | 18.5% | 11.3% |
| Consumer Staples | 6.8% | 14.3% |
| Information Technology | 9.1% | 1.1% |
| Other Sectors | 25.8% | 13.4% |
| Unclassified | 5.5% | 3.2% |
Share of each fund's portfolio weight by GICS-style sector, compiled from issuer fund data and our own classification of the holdings, not the issuers' published sector charts. “Unclassified” is weight we could not classify (6% of EFA, 3% of EWL).
Performance
| Fund | 1M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y (ann.) | 5Y (ann.) | 10Y (ann.) | Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EFA | +4.2% | +14.8% | +25.0% | +17.9% | +9.6% | +9.7% | 3.10% |
| EWL | +1.7% | +9.5% | +22.3% | +13.4% | +7.3% | +10.1% | 1.69% |
Total returns including dividends, from adjusted daily closes as of 2026-08-07. 3Y/5Y/10Y are annualized. Yield is trailing-12-month distributions over the last close. Past performance does not predict future results.
Project the growth of $10,000 in EFA vs EWL →
Shared Holdings(42)
The top 10 shared positions account for 74% of the overlap, led by ROP, NOVN and NESN.
1.32% | 14.03% | 1.32% | |
1.29% | 13.56% | 1.29% | |
1.20% | 12.34% | 1.20% | |
0.73% | 5.41% | 0.73% | |
0.65% | 5.13% | 0.65% | |
0.47% | 4.78% | 0.47% | |
0.47% | 4.44% | 0.47% | |
0.22% | 2.32% | 0.22% | |
0.22% | 2.64% | 0.22% | |
0.20% | 2.35% | 0.20% | |
0.18% | 2.24% | 0.18% | |
0.17% | 1.77% | 0.17% | |
0.15% | 1.93% | 0.15% | |
0.15% | 1.69% | 0.15% | |
0.15% | 1.83% | 0.15% | |
0.13% | 1.63% | 0.13% | |
0.11% | 1.32% | 0.11% | |
0.11% | 1.23% | 0.11% | |
0.10% | 1.29% | 0.10% | |
0.10% | 1.37% | 0.10% | |
0.09% | 1.37% | 0.09% | |
0.08% | 1.10% | 0.08% | |
0.08% | 1.03% | 0.08% | |
0.07% | 1.09% | 0.07% | |
0.07% | 0.84% | 0.07% |
Frequently Asked Questions
How much do EFA and EWL overlap?
EFA and EWL overlap by 9.2% of portfolio weight. They share 42 holdings (EFA holds 705 positions and EWL holds 42), based on each fund's latest SEC-reported holdings.
Is it redundant to own both EFA and EWL?
The two portfolios are 9.2% identical by weight. Owning both is not redundant. Most of each portfolio is distinct, so the funds can serve different roles.
What are the biggest shared holdings of EFA and EWL?
The largest positions held by both funds are ROP, NOVN, NESN, ABBN and UBSG. Together the top 10 shared positions account for 74% of the total overlap.
What does EFA own that EWL doesn't?
663 positions (89.9% of EFA) are unique to EFA, led by ASML, HSBA and AZN. In the other direction, 0 positions (0.0% of EWL) are unique to EWL.