EFA vs FNDF: Holdings Overlap
iShares · 705 holdings · $79.3B · as of 2026-04-30
FNDFSchwab Fundamental International Equity ETF
Schwab · 888 holdings · $25.2B · as of 2026-05-31
Holdings snapshots are 31 days apart (EFA: 2026-04-30, FNDF: 2026-05-31). Weights and index membership change between snapshots, so the true current overlap is typically higher than shown. For funds tracking the same index, the gap can be 5–15 points.
How similar are EFA and FNDF?
iShares MSCI EAFE ETF (EFA, by iShares) holds 705 positions; Schwab Fundamental International Equity ETF (FNDF, by Schwab) holds 888. They have 518 holdings in common, and by portfolio weight the two funds are 55.2% identical. In practical terms the pair is moderately overlapping; they share a meaningful core, but each fund adds distinct exposure.
- Overlap by Weight
- 55.2%Sum of the smaller weight of each shared holding
- Shared Holdings
- 518EFA holds 705 · FNDF holds 888
- Weight in Shared Holdings
- EFA 91%·FNDF 70%Share of each fund's weight in stocks both funds own
Based on each fund's latest official holdings. How is this calculated?
What makes each fund different
Only in EFA
187 of 705 positions (7.9% of the fund) are not held by FNDF. Showing the top 30 by weight.
Sector Breakdown
| Sector | EFA | FNDF |
|---|---|---|
| Financials | 23.8% | 15.8% |
| Industrials | 18.5% | 11.4% |
| Information Technology | 9.1% | 12.3% |
| Energy | 3.9% | 10.0% |
| Health Care | 9.7% | 5.3% |
| Other Sectors | 28.7% | 31.4% |
| Unclassified | 5.5% | 13.1% |
Share of each fund's portfolio weight by GICS-style sector, compiled from issuer fund data and our own classification of the holdings, not the issuers' published sector charts. “Unclassified” is weight we could not classify (6% of EFA, 13% of FNDF).
Performance
| Fund | 1M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y (ann.) | 5Y (ann.) | 10Y (ann.) | Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EFA | +4.2% | +14.8% | +25.0% | +17.9% | +9.6% | +9.7% | 3.10% |
| FNDF | +4.2% | +22.8% | +39.1% | +23.1% | +14.5% | +12.0% | 2.97% |
Total returns including dividends, from adjusted daily closes as of 2026-08-07. 3Y/5Y/10Y are annualized. Yield is trailing-12-month distributions over the last close. Past performance does not predict future results.
Project the growth of $10,000 in EFA vs FNDF →
Shared Holdings(518)
The top 10 shared positions account for 15% of the overlap, led by SHEL, HSBA and BHP.
1.19% | 2.19% | 1.19% | |
1.45% | 1.00% | 1.00% | |
0.93% | 1.22% | 0.93% | |
0.85% | 1.69% | 0.85% | |
0.84% | 0.89% | 0.84% | |
1.32% | 0.82% | 0.82% | |
0.82% | 0.73% | 0.73% | |
1.20% | 0.67% | 0.67% | |
1.29% | 0.59% | 0.59% | |
0.59% | 0.58% | 0.58% | |
0.57% | 1.08% | 0.57% | |
0.55% | 0.62% | 0.55% | |
0.52% | 0.80% | 0.52% | |
0.48% | 0.62% | 0.48% | |
1.04% | 0.47% | 0.47% | |
0.49% | 0.47% | 0.47% | |
0.80% | 0.43% | 0.43% | |
0.43% | 0.46% | 0.43% | |
0.58% | 0.41% | 0.41% | |
0.58% | 0.41% | 0.41% | |
0.67% | 0.40% | 0.40% | |
2.58% | 0.40% | 0.40% | |
0.47% | 0.40% | 0.40% | |
0.44% | 0.38% | 0.38% | |
1.35% | 0.38% | 0.38% |
Showing the top 250 of 518 shared holdings by overlap weight.
Frequently Asked Questions
How much do EFA and FNDF overlap?
EFA and FNDF overlap by 55.2% of portfolio weight. They share 518 holdings (EFA holds 705 positions and FNDF holds 888), based on each fund's latest SEC-reported holdings.
Is it redundant to own both EFA and FNDF?
The two portfolios are 55.2% identical by weight. Owning both is defensible: they share a meaningful core, but each fund adds exposure the other lacks.
What are the biggest shared holdings of EFA and FNDF?
The largest positions held by both funds are SHEL, HSBA, BHP, TTE and 7203. Together the top 10 shared positions account for 15% of the total overlap.
What does EFA own that FNDF doesn't?
187 positions (7.9% of EFA) are unique to EFA, led by INVEB, ARGXB and Euro. In the other direction, 370 positions (29.7% of FNDF) are unique to FNDF.