EFA vs GNR: Holdings Overlap
iShares · 705 holdings · $79.3B · as of 2026-04-30
GNRState Street® SPDR® S&P® Global Natural Resources ETF
State Street (SPDR) · 94 holdings · $4.8B · as of 2026-08-06
Holdings snapshots are 98 days apart (EFA: 2026-04-30, GNR: 2026-08-06). Weights and index membership change between snapshots, so the true current overlap is typically higher than shown. For funds tracking the same index, the gap can be 5–15 points.
How similar are EFA and GNR?
iShares MSCI EAFE ETF (EFA, by iShares) holds 705 positions; State Street® SPDR® S&P® Global Natural Resources ETF (GNR, by State Street (SPDR)) holds 94. They have 23 holdings in common, and by portfolio weight the two funds are 5.9% identical. In practical terms the pair is lightly overlapping, with most of each portfolio distinct.
- Overlap by Weight
- 5.9%Sum of the smaller weight of each shared holding
- Shared Holdings
- 23EFA holds 705 · GNR holds 94
- Weight in Shared Holdings
- EFA 6%·GNR 34%Share of each fund's weight in stocks both funds own
Based on each fund's latest official holdings. How is this calculated?
What makes each fund different
Only in EFA
682 of 705 positions (93.4% of the fund) are not held by GNR. Showing the top 30 by weight.
Sector Breakdown
| Sector | EFA | GNR |
|---|---|---|
| Materials | 5.8% | 57.3% |
| Energy | 3.9% | 32.0% |
| Financials | 23.8% | 0.0% |
| Industrials | 18.5% | 0.0% |
| Health Care | 9.7% | 0.0% |
| Other Sectors | 32.0% | 4.6% |
| Unclassified | 5.5% | 5.5% |
Share of each fund's portfolio weight by GICS-style sector, compiled from issuer fund data and our own classification of the holdings, not the issuers' published sector charts. “Unclassified” is weight we could not classify (6% of EFA, 6% of GNR).
Performance
| Fund | 1M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y (ann.) | 5Y (ann.) | 10Y (ann.) | Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EFA | +4.2% | +14.8% | +25.0% | +17.9% | +9.6% | +9.7% | 3.10% |
| GNR | +9.0% | +20.6% | +37.3% | +13.2% | +11.1% | +10.4% | 2.46% |
Total returns including dividends, from adjusted daily closes as of 2026-08-07. 3Y/5Y/10Y are annualized. Yield is trailing-12-month distributions over the last close. Past performance does not predict future results.
Project the growth of $10,000 in EFA vs GNR →
Shared Holdings(23)
The top 10 shared positions account for 84% of the overlap, led by SHEL, BHP and TTE.
1.19% | 4.37% | 1.19% | |
0.93% | 5.32% | 0.93% | |
0.85% | 3.01% | 0.85% | |
0.57% | 1.89% | 0.57% | |
0.36% | 1.74% | 0.36% | |
0.27% | 0.97% | 0.27% | |
0.26% | 1.52% | 0.26% | |
0.21% | 1.11% | 0.21% | |
0.21% | 0.73% | 0.21% | |
0.14% | 0.56% | 0.14% | |
0.14% | 0.56% | 0.14% | |
0.11% | 0.75% | 0.11% | |
0.11% | 0.52% | 0.11% | |
0.10% | 0.54% | 0.10% | |
0.09% | 0.44% | 0.09% | |
0.08% | 0.56% | 0.08% | |
0.07% | 2.75% | 0.07% | |
0.07% | 0.29% | 0.07% | |
0.04% | 1.39% | 0.04% | |
0.03% | 1.31% | 0.03% | |
0.03% | 1.33% | 0.03% | |
0.03% | 1.56% | 0.03% | |
0.02% | 0.73% | 0.02% |
Frequently Asked Questions
How much do EFA and GNR overlap?
EFA and GNR overlap by 5.9% of portfolio weight. They share 23 holdings (EFA holds 705 positions and GNR holds 94), based on each fund's latest SEC-reported holdings.
Is it redundant to own both EFA and GNR?
The two portfolios are 5.9% identical by weight. Owning both is not redundant. Most of each portfolio is distinct, so the funds can serve different roles.
What are the biggest shared holdings of EFA and GNR?
The largest positions held by both funds are SHEL, BHP, TTE, BP- and GLENPEN. Together the top 10 shared positions account for 84% of the total overlap.
What does EFA own that GNR doesn't?
682 positions (93.4% of EFA) are unique to EFA, led by ASML, HSBA and AZN. In the other direction, 71 positions (65.3% of GNR) are unique to GNR.