EFA vs IPAC: Holdings Overlap
iShares · 705 holdings · $79.3B · as of 2026-04-30
IPACiShares Core MSCI Pacific ETF
iShares · 1375 holdings · $2.7B · as of 2026-04-30
How similar are EFA and IPAC?
iShares MSCI EAFE ETF (EFA, by iShares) holds 705 positions; iShares Core MSCI Pacific ETF (IPAC, by iShares) holds 1375. They have 279 holdings in common, and by portfolio weight the two funds are 33.3% identical. In practical terms the pair is moderately overlapping; they share a meaningful core, but each fund adds distinct exposure.
- Overlap by Weight
- 33.3%Sum of the smaller weight of each shared holding
- Shared Holdings
- 279EFA holds 705 · IPAC holds 1375
- Weight in Shared Holdings
- EFA 34%·IPAC 79%Share of each fund's weight in stocks both funds own
Based on each fund's latest official holdings. How is this calculated?
What makes each fund different
Only in EFA
426 of 705 positions (65.7% of the fund) are not held by IPAC. Showing the top 30 by weight.
Sector Breakdown
| Sector | EFA | IPAC |
|---|---|---|
| Financials | 23.8% | 20.1% |
| Industrials | 18.5% | 15.3% |
| Health Care | 9.7% | 4.1% |
| Information Technology | 9.1% | 9.0% |
| Consumer Discretionary | 6.4% | 7.5% |
| Other Sectors | 26.3% | 21.1% |
| Unclassified | 5.5% | 22.2% |
Share of each fund's portfolio weight by GICS-style sector, compiled from issuer fund data and our own classification of the holdings, not the issuers' published sector charts. “Unclassified” is weight we could not classify (6% of EFA, 22% of IPAC).
Performance
| Fund | 1M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y (ann.) | 5Y (ann.) | 10Y (ann.) | Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EFA | +4.2% | +14.8% | +25.0% | +17.9% | +9.6% | +9.7% | 3.10% |
| IPAC | +4.8% | +18.9% | +27.2% | +18.2% | +9.0% | +9.1% | 3.71% |
Total returns including dividends, from adjusted daily closes as of 2026-08-07. 3Y/5Y/10Y are annualized. Yield is trailing-12-month distributions over the last close. Past performance does not predict future results.
Project the growth of $10,000 in EFA vs IPAC →
Shared Holdings(279)
The top 10 shared positions account for 22% of the overlap, led by CBA, 8306 and BHP.
0.97% | 2.30% | 0.97% | |
0.93% | 2.21% | 0.93% | |
0.93% | 2.19% | 0.93% | |
0.84% | 1.98% | 0.84% | |
0.67% | 1.59% | 0.67% | |
0.66% | 1.56% | 0.66% | |
0.61% | 1.44% | 0.61% | |
0.60% | 1.41% | 0.60% | |
0.58% | 1.38% | 0.58% | |
0.57% | 1.34% | 0.57% | |
0.53% | 1.25% | 0.53% | |
0.49% | 1.17% | 0.49% | |
0.48% | 1.12% | 0.48% | |
0.45% | 1.05% | 0.45% | |
0.44% | 1.04% | 0.44% | |
0.44% | 1.04% | 0.44% | |
0.43% | 1.01% | 0.43% | |
0.41% | 0.98% | 0.41% | |
0.41% | 0.98% | 0.41% | |
0.41% | 0.97% | 0.41% | |
0.39% | 0.92% | 0.39% | |
0.37% | 0.87% | 0.37% | |
0.36% | 0.85% | 0.36% | |
0.35% | 0.83% | 0.35% | |
0.34% | 0.80% | 0.34% |
Showing the top 250 of 279 shared holdings by overlap weight.
Frequently Asked Questions
How much do EFA and IPAC overlap?
EFA and IPAC overlap by 33.3% of portfolio weight. They share 279 holdings (EFA holds 705 positions and IPAC holds 1375), based on each fund's latest SEC-reported holdings.
Is it redundant to own both EFA and IPAC?
The two portfolios are 33.3% identical by weight. Owning both is defensible: they share a meaningful core, but each fund adds exposure the other lacks.
What are the biggest shared holdings of EFA and IPAC?
The largest positions held by both funds are CBA, 8306, BHP, 7203 and 6501. Together the top 10 shared positions account for 22% of the total overlap.
What does EFA own that IPAC doesn't?
426 positions (65.7% of EFA) are unique to EFA, led by ASML, HSBA and AZN. In the other direction, 1096 positions (20.2% of IPAC) are unique to IPAC.