EFA vs IXG: Holdings Overlap
iShares · 705 holdings · $79.3B · as of 2026-04-30
IXGiShares Global Financials ETF
iShares · 235 holdings · $699M · as of 2026-03-31
Holdings snapshots are 30 days apart (EFA: 2026-04-30, IXG: 2026-03-31). Weights and index membership change between snapshots, so the true current overlap is typically higher than shown. For funds tracking the same index, the gap can be 5–15 points.
How similar are EFA and IXG?
iShares MSCI EAFE ETF (EFA, by iShares) holds 705 positions; iShares Global Financials ETF (IXG, by iShares) holds 235. They have 113 holdings in common, and by portfolio weight the two funds are 23.3% identical. In practical terms the pair is lightly overlapping, with most of each portfolio distinct.
- Overlap by Weight
- 23.3%Sum of the smaller weight of each shared holding
- Shared Holdings
- 113EFA holds 705 · IXG holds 235
- Weight in Shared Holdings
- EFA 24%·IXG 35%Share of each fund's weight in stocks both funds own
Based on each fund's latest official holdings. How is this calculated?
What makes each fund different
Only in EFA
592 of 705 positions (75.7% of the fund) are not held by IXG. Showing the top 30 by weight.
Only in IXG
122 of 235 positions (64.0% of the fund) are not held by EFA. Showing the top 30 by weight.
Sector Breakdown
| Sector | EFA | IXG |
|---|---|---|
| Financials | 23.8% | 99.3% |
| Industrials | 18.5% | 0.0% |
| Health Care | 9.7% | 0.0% |
| Information Technology | 9.1% | 0.0% |
| Consumer Staples | 6.8% | 0.0% |
| Other Sectors | 25.8% | 0.2% |
| Unclassified | 5.5% | 0.0% |
Share of each fund's portfolio weight by GICS-style sector, compiled from issuer fund data and our own classification of the holdings, not the issuers' published sector charts. “Unclassified” is weight we could not classify (6% of EFA, 0% of IXG).
Performance
| Fund | 1M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y (ann.) | 5Y (ann.) | 10Y (ann.) | Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EFA | +4.2% | +14.8% | +25.0% | +17.9% | +9.6% | +9.7% | 3.10% |
| IXG | +4.2% | +13.1% | +23.8% | +25.1% | +14.4% | +13.3% | 2.10% |
Total returns including dividends, from adjusted daily closes as of 2026-08-07. 3Y/5Y/10Y are annualized. Yield is trailing-12-month distributions over the last close. Past performance does not predict future results.
Project the growth of $10,000 in EFA vs IXG →
Shared Holdings(113)
The top 10 shared positions account for 34% of the overlap, led by HSBA, CBA and 8306.
1.45% | 2.05% | 1.45% | |
0.97% | 1.43% | 0.97% | |
0.93% | 1.48% | 0.93% | |
0.82% | 1.20% | 0.82% | |
0.80% | 1.17% | 0.80% | |
0.65% | 0.86% | 0.65% | |
0.60% | 0.92% | 0.60% | |
0.58% | 0.90% | 0.58% | |
0.53% | 0.85% | 0.53% | |
0.50% | 0.82% | 0.50% | |
0.49% | 0.73% | 0.49% | |
0.49% | 0.69% | 0.49% | |
0.47% | 0.79% | 0.47% | |
0.45% | 0.65% | 0.45% | |
0.44% | 0.69% | 0.44% | |
0.44% | 0.68% | 0.44% | |
0.41% | 0.65% | 0.41% | |
0.39% | 0.52% | 0.39% | |
0.39% | 0.66% | 0.39% | |
0.37% | 0.53% | 0.37% | |
0.37% | 0.55% | 0.37% | |
0.37% | 0.55% | 0.37% | |
0.37% | 0.53% | 0.37% | |
0.36% | 0.60% | 0.36% | |
0.34% | 0.50% | 0.34% |
Frequently Asked Questions
How much do EFA and IXG overlap?
EFA and IXG overlap by 23.3% of portfolio weight. They share 113 holdings (EFA holds 705 positions and IXG holds 235), based on each fund's latest SEC-reported holdings.
Is it redundant to own both EFA and IXG?
The two portfolios are 23.3% identical by weight. Owning both is not redundant. Most of each portfolio is distinct, so the funds can serve different roles.
What are the biggest shared holdings of EFA and IXG?
The largest positions held by both funds are HSBA, CBA, 8306, SAN and ALV. Together the top 10 shared positions account for 34% of the total overlap.
What does EFA own that IXG doesn't?
592 positions (75.7% of EFA) are unique to EFA, led by ASML, AZN and ROP. In the other direction, 122 positions (64.0% of IXG) are unique to IXG.