EFA vs IXN: Holdings Overlap
iShares · 705 holdings · $79.3B · as of 2026-04-30
iShares · 137 holdings · $8.8B · as of 2026-03-31
Holdings snapshots are 30 days apart (EFA: 2026-04-30, IXN: 2026-03-31). Weights and index membership change between snapshots, so the true current overlap is typically higher than shown. For funds tracking the same index, the gap can be 5–15 points.
How similar are EFA and IXN?
iShares MSCI EAFE ETF (EFA, by iShares) holds 705 positions; iShares Global Tech ETF (IXN, by iShares) holds 137. They have 40 holdings in common, and by portfolio weight the two funds are 8.4% identical. In practical terms the pair is lightly overlapping, with most of each portfolio distinct.
- Overlap by Weight
- 8.4%Sum of the smaller weight of each shared holding
- Shared Holdings
- 40EFA holds 705 · IXN holds 137
- Weight in Shared Holdings
- EFA 9%·IXN 10%Share of each fund's weight in stocks both funds own
Based on each fund's latest official holdings. How is this calculated?
What makes each fund different
Only in EFA
665 of 705 positions (90.3% of the fund) are not held by IXN. Showing the top 30 by weight.
Sector Breakdown
| Sector | EFA | IXN |
|---|---|---|
| Information Technology | 9.1% | 99.1% |
| Financials | 23.8% | 0.0% |
| Industrials | 18.5% | 0.0% |
| Health Care | 9.7% | 0.0% |
| Consumer Staples | 6.8% | 0.0% |
| Other Sectors | 25.8% | 0.7% |
| Unclassified | 5.5% | 0.0% |
Share of each fund's portfolio weight by GICS-style sector, compiled from issuer fund data and our own classification of the holdings, not the issuers' published sector charts. “Unclassified” is weight we could not classify (6% of EFA, 0% of IXN).
Performance
| Fund | 1M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y (ann.) | 5Y (ann.) | 10Y (ann.) | Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EFA | +4.2% | +14.8% | +25.0% | +17.9% | +9.6% | +9.7% | 3.10% |
| IXN | +3.7% | +34.3% | +47.4% | +33.2% | +19.9% | +24.0% | 0.78% |
Total returns including dividends, from adjusted daily closes as of 2026-08-07. 3Y/5Y/10Y are annualized. Yield is trailing-12-month distributions over the last close. Past performance does not predict future results.
Project the growth of $10,000 in EFA vs IXN →
Shared Holdings(40)
The top 10 shared positions account for 74% of the overlap, led by ASML, SAP and 8035.
2.58% | 3.01% | 2.58% | |
0.81% | 1.01% | 0.81% | |
0.61% | 0.68% | 0.61% | |
0.66% | 0.59% | 0.59% | |
0.41% | 0.41% | 0.41% | |
0.40% | 0.34% | 0.34% | |
0.31% | 0.25% | 0.25% | |
0.26% | 0.24% | 0.24% | |
0.21% | 0.20% | 0.20% | |
0.20% | 0.22% | 0.20% | |
0.16% | 0.21% | 0.16% | |
0.16% | 0.20% | 0.16% | |
0.17% | 0.16% | 0.16% | |
0.15% | 0.19% | 0.15% | |
0.16% | 0.15% | 0.15% | |
0.17% | 0.13% | 0.13% | |
0.11% | 0.11% | 0.11% | |
0.10% | 0.12% | 0.10% | |
0.10% | 0.13% | 0.10% | |
0.10% | 0.15% | 0.10% | |
0.10% | 0.10% | 0.10% | |
0.09% | 0.14% | 0.09% | |
0.10% | 0.09% | 0.09% | |
0.09% | 0.11% | 0.09% | |
0.07% | 0.08% | 0.07% |
Frequently Asked Questions
How much do EFA and IXN overlap?
EFA and IXN overlap by 8.4% of portfolio weight. They share 40 holdings (EFA holds 705 positions and IXN holds 137), based on each fund's latest SEC-reported holdings.
Is it redundant to own both EFA and IXN?
The two portfolios are 8.4% identical by weight. Owning both is not redundant. Most of each portfolio is distinct, so the funds can serve different roles.
What are the biggest shared holdings of EFA and IXN?
The largest positions held by both funds are ASML, SAP, 8035, 6857 and 6861. Together the top 10 shared positions account for 74% of the total overlap.
What does EFA own that IXN doesn't?
665 positions (90.3% of EFA) are unique to EFA, led by HSBA, AZN and ROP. In the other direction, 97 positions (90.3% of IXN) are unique to IXN.