EFA vs MCHI: Holdings Overlap
iShares · 705 holdings · $79.3B · as of 2026-04-30
iShares · 580 holdings · $6.3B · as of 2026-05-31
Holdings snapshots are 31 days apart (EFA: 2026-04-30, MCHI: 2026-05-31). Weights and index membership change between snapshots, so the true current overlap is typically higher than shown. For funds tracking the same index, the gap can be 5–15 points.
How similar are EFA and MCHI?
iShares MSCI EAFE ETF (EFA, by iShares) holds 705 positions; iShares MSCI China ETF (MCHI, by iShares) holds 580. They have 2 holdings in common, and by portfolio weight the two funds are 0.0% identical. In practical terms the pair is essentially distinct, holding almost none of the same securities.
- Overlap by Weight
- 0.0%Sum of the smaller weight of each shared holding
- Shared Holdings
- 2EFA holds 705 · MCHI holds 580
- Weight in Shared Holdings
- EFA 0%·MCHI 0%Share of each fund's weight in stocks both funds own
Based on each fund's latest official holdings. How is this calculated?
What makes each fund different
Only in EFA
703 of 705 positions (99.1% of the fund) are not held by MCHI. Showing the top 30 by weight.
Only in MCHI
578 of 580 positions (99.4% of the fund) are not held by EFA. Showing the top 30 by weight.
Sector Breakdown
| Sector | EFA | MCHI |
|---|---|---|
| Financials | 23.8% | 14.8% |
| Consumer Discretionary | 6.4% | 21.1% |
| Industrials | 18.5% | 1.6% |
| Communication Services | 4.1% | 17.2% |
| Health Care | 9.7% | 0.9% |
| Other Sectors | 31.3% | 15.4% |
| Unclassified | 5.5% | 28.5% |
Share of each fund's portfolio weight by GICS-style sector, compiled from issuer fund data and our own classification of the holdings, not the issuers' published sector charts. “Unclassified” is weight we could not classify (6% of EFA, 29% of MCHI).
Performance
| Fund | 1M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y (ann.) | 5Y (ann.) | 10Y (ann.) | Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EFA | +4.2% | +14.8% | +25.0% | +17.9% | +9.6% | +9.7% | 3.10% |
| MCHI | +9.3% | -5.2% | -1.0% | +8.7% | -2.2% | +4.3% | 1.94% |
Total returns including dividends, from adjusted daily closes as of 2026-08-07. 3Y/5Y/10Y are annualized. Yield is trailing-12-month distributions over the last close. Past performance does not predict future results.
Project the growth of $10,000 in EFA vs MCHI →
Shared Holdings(2)
| HONG KONG DOLLAR | 0.00% | 0.20% | 0.00% |
|---|---|---|---|
| Euro | 0.19% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
How much do EFA and MCHI overlap?
EFA and MCHI overlap by 0.0% of portfolio weight. They share 2 holdings (EFA holds 705 positions and MCHI holds 580), based on each fund's latest SEC-reported holdings.
Is it redundant to own both EFA and MCHI?
The two portfolios are 0.0% identical by weight. Owning both is genuine diversification: the funds hold almost none of the same securities.
What are the biggest shared holdings of EFA and MCHI?
The largest positions held by both funds are HONG KONG DOLLAR and Euro. Together the top 2 shared positions account for 0% of the total overlap.
What does EFA own that MCHI doesn't?
703 positions (99.1% of EFA) are unique to EFA, led by ASML, HSBA and AZN. In the other direction, 578 positions (99.4% of MCHI) are unique to MCHI.