EFA vs MXI: Holdings Overlap
iShares · 705 holdings · $79.3B · as of 2026-04-30
MXIiShares Global Materials ETF
iShares · 101 holdings · $349M · as of 2026-03-31
Holdings snapshots are 30 days apart (EFA: 2026-04-30, MXI: 2026-03-31). Weights and index membership change between snapshots, so the true current overlap is typically higher than shown. For funds tracking the same index, the gap can be 5–15 points.
How similar are EFA and MXI?
iShares MSCI EAFE ETF (EFA, by iShares) holds 705 positions; iShares Global Materials ETF (MXI, by iShares) holds 101. They have 47 holdings in common, and by portfolio weight the two funds are 5.8% identical. In practical terms the pair is lightly overlapping, with most of each portfolio distinct.
- Overlap by Weight
- 5.8%Sum of the smaller weight of each shared holding
- Shared Holdings
- 47EFA holds 705 · MXI holds 101
- Weight in Shared Holdings
- EFA 6%·MXI 40%Share of each fund's weight in stocks both funds own
Based on each fund's latest official holdings. How is this calculated?
What makes each fund different
Only in EFA
658 of 705 positions (93.3% of the fund) are not held by MXI. Showing the top 30 by weight.
Sector Breakdown
| Sector | EFA | MXI |
|---|---|---|
| Materials | 5.8% | 99.5% |
| Financials | 23.8% | 0.0% |
| Industrials | 18.5% | 0.0% |
| Health Care | 9.7% | 0.0% |
| Information Technology | 9.1% | 0.0% |
| Other Sectors | 26.9% | 0.2% |
| Unclassified | 5.5% | 0.0% |
Share of each fund's portfolio weight by GICS-style sector, compiled from issuer fund data and our own classification of the holdings, not the issuers' published sector charts. “Unclassified” is weight we could not classify (6% of EFA, 0% of MXI).
Performance
| Fund | 1M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y (ann.) | 5Y (ann.) | 10Y (ann.) | Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EFA | +4.2% | +14.8% | +25.0% | +17.9% | +9.6% | +9.7% | 3.10% |
| MXI | +6.2% | +18.1% | +32.9% | +13.0% | +7.2% | +10.9% | 1.62% |
Total returns including dividends, from adjusted daily closes as of 2026-08-07. 3Y/5Y/10Y are annualized. Yield is trailing-12-month distributions over the last close. Past performance does not predict future results.
Project the growth of $10,000 in EFA vs MXI →
Shared Holdings(47)
The top 10 shared positions account for 66% of the overlap, led by BHP, AI and RIO.
0.93% | 6.21% | 0.93% | |
0.57% | 4.04% | 0.57% | |
0.52% | 3.34% | 0.52% | |
0.36% | 2.73% | 0.36% | |
0.36% | 2.43% | 0.36% | |
0.26% | 1.86% | 0.26% | |
0.26% | 1.71% | 0.26% | |
0.22% | 1.41% | 0.22% | |
0.21% | 1.43% | 0.21% | |
0.15% | 0.93% | 0.15% | |
0.14% | 0.91% | 0.14% | |
0.13% | 0.90% | 0.13% | |
0.11% | 0.74% | 0.11% | |
0.11% | 0.80% | 0.11% | |
0.10% | 0.69% | 0.10% | |
0.10% | 0.70% | 0.10% | |
0.09% | 0.52% | 0.09% | |
0.08% | 0.62% | 0.08% | |
0.08% | 0.67% | 0.08% | |
0.07% | 0.56% | 0.07% | |
0.07% | 0.47% | 0.07% | |
0.07% | 0.55% | 0.07% | |
0.07% | 0.50% | 0.07% | |
0.06% | 0.46% | 0.06% | |
0.06% | 0.60% | 0.06% |
Frequently Asked Questions
How much do EFA and MXI overlap?
EFA and MXI overlap by 5.8% of portfolio weight. They share 47 holdings (EFA holds 705 positions and MXI holds 101), based on each fund's latest SEC-reported holdings.
Is it redundant to own both EFA and MXI?
The two portfolios are 5.8% identical by weight. Owning both is not redundant. Most of each portfolio is distinct, so the funds can serve different roles.
What are the biggest shared holdings of EFA and MXI?
The largest positions held by both funds are BHP, AI, RIO, 4063 and GLENPEN. Together the top 10 shared positions account for 66% of the total overlap.
What does EFA own that MXI doesn't?
658 positions (93.3% of EFA) are unique to EFA, led by ASML, HSBA and AZN. In the other direction, 54 positions (59.3% of MXI) are unique to MXI.