EFAV vs EWG: Holdings Overlap
EFAViShares MSCI EAFE Min Vol Factor ETF
iShares · 256 holdings · $5.4B · as of 2026-04-30
iShares · 55 holdings · $1.6B · as of 2026-05-31
Holdings snapshots are 31 days apart (EFAV: 2026-04-30, EWG: 2026-05-31). Weights and index membership change between snapshots, so the true current overlap is typically higher than shown. For funds tracking the same index, the gap can be 5–15 points.
How similar are EFAV and EWG?
iShares MSCI EAFE Min Vol Factor ETF (EFAV, by iShares) holds 256 positions; iShares MSCI Germany ETF (EWG, by iShares) holds 55. They have 15 holdings in common, and by portfolio weight the two funds are 4.0% identical. In practical terms the pair is essentially distinct, holding almost none of the same securities.
- Overlap by Weight
- 4.0%Sum of the smaller weight of each shared holding
- Shared Holdings
- 15EFAV holds 256 · EWG holds 55
- Weight in Shared Holdings
- EFAV 4%·EWG 41%Share of each fund's weight in stocks both funds own
Based on each fund's latest official holdings. How is this calculated?
What makes each fund different
Only in EFAV
241 of 256 positions (95.3% of the fund) are not held by EWG. Showing the top 30 by weight.
Sector Breakdown
| Sector | EFAV | EWG |
|---|---|---|
| Industrials | 13.2% | 28.6% |
| Financials | 18.9% | 20.0% |
| Information Technology | 3.7% | 15.7% |
| Consumer Staples | 11.7% | 1.4% |
| Health Care | 10.8% | 5.9% |
| Other Sectors | 32.0% | 22.8% |
| Unclassified | 9.1% | 5.4% |
Share of each fund's portfolio weight by GICS-style sector, compiled from issuer fund data and our own classification of the holdings, not the issuers' published sector charts. “Unclassified” is weight we could not classify (9% of EFAV, 5% of EWG).
Performance
| Fund | 1M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y (ann.) | 5Y (ann.) | 10Y (ann.) | Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EFAV | +5.0% | +11.3% | +15.7% | +15.3% | +7.1% | +6.6% | 3.03% |
| EWG | +4.7% | +5.7% | +6.1% | +18.0% | +7.5% | +8.2% | 1.89% |
Total returns including dividends, from adjusted daily closes as of 2026-08-07. 3Y/5Y/10Y are annualized. Yield is trailing-12-month distributions over the last close. Past performance does not predict future results.
Project the growth of $10,000 in EFAV vs EWG →
Shared Holdings(15)
The top 10 shared positions account for 90% of the overlap, led by DTE, DB1 and EOAN.
0.62% | 6.21% | 0.62% | |
0.58% | 2.73% | 0.58% | |
0.48% | 2.40% | 0.48% | |
0.41% | 3.45% | 0.41% | |
0.37% | 0.38% | 0.37% | |
0.32% | 9.49% | 0.32% | |
0.26% | 0.39% | 0.26% | |
0.26% | 8.47% | 0.26% | |
0.18% | 0.90% | 0.18% | |
| Euro | 0.13% | 0.26% | 0.13% |
0.11% | 3.48% | 0.11% | |
0.11% | 0.99% | 0.11% | |
0.08% | 0.61% | 0.08% | |
0.05% | 0.82% | 0.05% | |
0.04% | 0.38% | 0.04% |
Frequently Asked Questions
How much do EFAV and EWG overlap?
EFAV and EWG overlap by 4.0% of portfolio weight. They share 15 holdings (EFAV holds 256 positions and EWG holds 55), based on each fund's latest SEC-reported holdings.
Is it redundant to own both EFAV and EWG?
The two portfolios are 4.0% identical by weight. Owning both is genuine diversification: the funds hold almost none of the same securities.
What are the biggest shared holdings of EFAV and EWG?
The largest positions held by both funds are DTE, DB1, EOAN, MUV2 and QIA. Together the top 10 shared positions account for 90% of the total overlap.
What does EFAV own that EWG doesn't?
241 positions (95.3% of EFAV) are unique to EFAV, led by ENI, TTE and EQNR. In the other direction, 40 positions (58.8% of EWG) are unique to EWG.