EFAV vs ICLN: Holdings Overlap
EFAViShares MSCI EAFE Min Vol Factor ETF
iShares · 256 holdings · $5.4B · as of 2026-04-30
ICLNiShares Global Clean Energy ETF
iShares · 123 holdings · $2.3B · as of 2026-04-30
How similar are EFAV and ICLN?
iShares MSCI EAFE Min Vol Factor ETF (EFAV, by iShares) holds 256 positions; iShares Global Clean Energy ETF (ICLN, by iShares) holds 123. They have 13 holdings in common, and by portfolio weight the two funds are 0.5% identical. In practical terms the pair is essentially distinct, holding almost none of the same securities.
- Overlap by Weight
- 0.5%Sum of the smaller weight of each shared holding
- Shared Holdings
- 13EFAV holds 256 · ICLN holds 123
- Weight in Shared Holdings
- EFAV 1%·ICLN 3%Share of each fund's weight in stocks both funds own
Based on each fund's latest official holdings. How is this calculated?
What makes each fund different
Only in EFAV
243 of 256 positions (98.5% of the fund) are not held by ICLN. Showing the top 30 by weight.
Only in ICLN
110 of 123 positions (96.6% of the fund) are not held by EFAV. Showing the top 30 by weight.
Sector Breakdown
| Sector | EFAV | ICLN |
|---|---|---|
| Industrials | 13.2% | 32.4% |
| Utilities | 8.1% | 19.4% |
| Financials | 18.9% | 0.0% |
| Information Technology | 3.7% | 12.3% |
| Consumer Staples | 11.7% | 0.0% |
| Other Sectors | 34.6% | 1.3% |
| Unclassified | 9.1% | 34.0% |
Share of each fund's portfolio weight by GICS-style sector, compiled from issuer fund data and our own classification of the holdings, not the issuers' published sector charts. “Unclassified” is weight we could not classify (9% of EFAV, 34% of ICLN).
Performance
| Fund | 1M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y (ann.) | 5Y (ann.) | 10Y (ann.) | Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EFAV | +5.0% | +11.3% | +15.7% | +15.3% | +7.1% | +6.6% | 3.03% |
| ICLN | -5.3% | +11.7% | +34.9% | +4.0% | -3.1% | +8.9% | 1.01% |
Total returns including dividends, from adjusted daily closes as of 2026-08-07. 3Y/5Y/10Y are annualized. Yield is trailing-12-month distributions over the last close. Past performance does not predict future results.
Project the growth of $10,000 in EFAV vs ICLN →
Shared Holdings(13)
The top 10 shared positions account for 99% of the overlap, led by 9502, VER and MEL.
0.23% | 2.01% | 0.23% | |
0.13% | 0.50% | 0.13% | |
0.05% | 0.22% | 0.05% | |
| Euro | 0.13% | 0.02% | 0.02% |
| HONG KONG DOLLAR | 0.01% | 0.02% | 0.01% |
| JAPANESE YEN | 0.06% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
| GREAT BRITISH POUND | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
| ISRAELI SHEKEL | 0.03% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
| NORWEGIAN KRONE | 0.04% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
| DANISH KRONER | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
| NEW ZEALAND DOLLAR | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
| SWEDISH KRONE | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
| SWISS FRANC | 0.01% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
How much do EFAV and ICLN overlap?
EFAV and ICLN overlap by 0.5% of portfolio weight. They share 13 holdings (EFAV holds 256 positions and ICLN holds 123), based on each fund's latest SEC-reported holdings.
Is it redundant to own both EFAV and ICLN?
The two portfolios are 0.5% identical by weight. Owning both is genuine diversification: the funds hold almost none of the same securities.
What are the biggest shared holdings of EFAV and ICLN?
The largest positions held by both funds are 9502, VER, MEL, Euro and HONG KONG DOLLAR. Together the top 10 shared positions account for 99% of the total overlap.
What does EFAV own that ICLN doesn't?
243 positions (98.5% of EFAV) are unique to EFAV, led by ENI, TTE and EQNR. In the other direction, 110 positions (96.6% of ICLN) are unique to ICLN.