EFG vs EWA: Holdings Overlap
EFGiShares MSCI EAFE Growth ETF
iShares · 383 holdings · $17.1B · as of 2026-04-30
iShares · 48 holdings · $1.4B · as of 2026-05-31
Holdings snapshots are 31 days apart (EFG: 2026-04-30, EWA: 2026-05-31). Weights and index membership change between snapshots, so the true current overlap is typically higher than shown. For funds tracking the same index, the gap can be 5–15 points.
How similar are EFG and EWA?
iShares MSCI EAFE Growth ETF (EFG, by iShares) holds 383 positions; iShares MSCI Australia ETF (EWA, by iShares) holds 48. They have 30 holdings in common, and by portfolio weight the two funds are 6.4% identical. In practical terms the pair is lightly overlapping, with most of each portfolio distinct.
- Overlap by Weight
- 6.4%Sum of the smaller weight of each shared holding
- Shared Holdings
- 30EFG holds 383 · EWA holds 48
- Weight in Shared Holdings
- EFG 6%·EWA 49%Share of each fund's weight in stocks both funds own
Based on each fund's latest official holdings. How is this calculated?
What makes each fund different
Only in EFG
353 of 383 positions (93.1% of the fund) are not held by EWA. Showing the top 30 by weight.
Sector Breakdown
| Sector | EFG | EWA |
|---|---|---|
| Financials | 10.6% | 40.6% |
| Industrials | 28.8% | 4.7% |
| Materials | 4.3% | 25.5% |
| Information Technology | 16.1% | 1.0% |
| Health Care | 13.3% | 4.3% |
| Other Sectors | 20.1% | 22.4% |
| Unclassified | 6.4% | 1.0% |
Share of each fund's portfolio weight by GICS-style sector, compiled from issuer fund data and our own classification of the holdings, not the issuers' published sector charts. “Unclassified” is weight we could not classify (6% of EFG, 1% of EWA).
Performance
| Fund | 1M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y (ann.) | 5Y (ann.) | 10Y (ann.) | Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EFG | +3.0% | +11.7% | +17.6% | +12.3% | +4.5% | +8.2% | 2.21% |
| EWA | +8.1% | +17.8% | +17.9% | +14.3% | +7.2% | +8.2% | 2.79% |
Total returns including dividends, from adjusted daily closes as of 2026-08-07. 3Y/5Y/10Y are annualized. Yield is trailing-12-month distributions over the last close. Past performance does not predict future results.
Project the growth of $10,000 in EFG vs EWA →
Shared Holdings(30)
The top 10 shared positions account for 72% of the overlap, led by CBA, MQG and WES.
1.33% | 13.76% | 1.33% | |
0.61% | 4.31% | 0.61% | |
0.59% | 4.51% | 0.59% | |
0.43% | 3.22% | 0.43% | |
0.43% | 2.34% | 0.43% | |
0.31% | 2.32% | 0.31% | |
0.30% | 2.14% | 0.30% | |
0.22% | 1.12% | 0.22% | |
0.21% | 1.45% | 0.21% | |
0.20% | 1.29% | 0.20% | |
0.19% | 1.38% | 0.19% | |
0.18% | 1.24% | 0.18% | |
0.15% | 1.02% | 0.15% | |
0.13% | 0.90% | 0.13% | |
0.12% | 0.87% | 0.12% | |
0.11% | 0.90% | 0.11% | |
0.10% | 0.76% | 0.10% | |
0.10% | 0.64% | 0.10% | |
0.09% | 0.66% | 0.09% | |
0.09% | 0.60% | 0.09% | |
0.08% | 0.45% | 0.08% | |
0.07% | 0.47% | 0.07% | |
0.07% | 0.39% | 0.07% | |
0.06% | 0.36% | 0.06% | |
0.06% | 0.42% | 0.06% |
Frequently Asked Questions
How much do EFG and EWA overlap?
EFG and EWA overlap by 6.4% of portfolio weight. They share 30 holdings (EFG holds 383 positions and EWA holds 48), based on each fund's latest SEC-reported holdings.
Is it redundant to own both EFG and EWA?
The two portfolios are 6.4% identical by weight. Owning both is not redundant. Most of each portfolio is distinct, so the funds can serve different roles.
What are the biggest shared holdings of EFG and EWA?
The largest positions held by both funds are CBA, MQG, WES, GMG and CSL. Together the top 10 shared positions account for 72% of the total overlap.
What does EFG own that EWA doesn't?
353 positions (93.1% of EFG) are unique to EFG, led by ASML, AZN and NOVN. In the other direction, 18 positions (50.8% of EWA) are unique to EWA.