EFG vs EWG: Holdings Overlap
EFGiShares MSCI EAFE Growth ETF
iShares · 383 holdings · $17.1B · as of 2026-04-30
iShares · 55 holdings · $1.6B · as of 2026-05-31
Holdings snapshots are 31 days apart (EFG: 2026-04-30, EWG: 2026-05-31). Weights and index membership change between snapshots, so the true current overlap is typically higher than shown. For funds tracking the same index, the gap can be 5–15 points.
How similar are EFG and EWG?
iShares MSCI EAFE Growth ETF (EFG, by iShares) holds 383 positions; iShares MSCI Germany ETF (EWG, by iShares) holds 55. They have 31 holdings in common, and by portfolio weight the two funds are 9.5% identical. In practical terms the pair is lightly overlapping, with most of each portfolio distinct.
- Overlap by Weight
- 9.5%Sum of the smaller weight of each shared holding
- Shared Holdings
- 31EFG holds 383 · EWG holds 55
- Weight in Shared Holdings
- EFG 10%·EWG 65%Share of each fund's weight in stocks both funds own
Based on each fund's latest official holdings. How is this calculated?
What makes each fund different
Only in EFG
352 of 383 positions (90.0% of the fund) are not held by EWG. Showing the top 30 by weight.
Sector Breakdown
| Sector | EFG | EWG |
|---|---|---|
| Industrials | 28.8% | 28.6% |
| Financials | 10.6% | 20.0% |
| Information Technology | 16.1% | 15.7% |
| Health Care | 13.3% | 5.9% |
| Consumer Discretionary | 8.7% | 6.2% |
| Other Sectors | 15.7% | 18.0% |
| Unclassified | 6.4% | 5.4% |
Share of each fund's portfolio weight by GICS-style sector, compiled from issuer fund data and our own classification of the holdings, not the issuers' published sector charts. “Unclassified” is weight we could not classify (6% of EFG, 5% of EWG).
Performance
| Fund | 1M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y (ann.) | 5Y (ann.) | 10Y (ann.) | Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EFG | +3.0% | +11.7% | +17.6% | +12.3% | +4.5% | +8.2% | 2.21% |
| EWG | +4.7% | +5.7% | +6.1% | +18.0% | +7.5% | +8.2% | 1.89% |
Total returns including dividends, from adjusted daily closes as of 2026-08-07. 3Y/5Y/10Y are annualized. Yield is trailing-12-month distributions over the last close. Past performance does not predict future results.
Project the growth of $10,000 in EFG vs EWG →
Shared Holdings(31)
The top 10 shared positions account for 81% of the overlap, led by SAP, ENR and IFX.
1.70% | 9.49% | 1.70% | |
1.60% | 7.37% | 1.60% | |
0.85% | 6.22% | 0.85% | |
0.77% | 11.97% | 0.77% | |
0.71% | 3.48% | 0.71% | |
0.56% | 2.73% | 0.56% | |
0.48% | 2.40% | 0.48% | |
0.40% | 6.21% | 0.40% | |
0.29% | 1.66% | 0.29% | |
0.29% | 1.49% | 0.29% | |
0.27% | 2.96% | 0.27% | |
0.19% | 1.58% | 0.19% | |
0.18% | 0.99% | 0.18% | |
0.12% | 0.61% | 0.12% | |
0.10% | 0.48% | 0.10% | |
0.09% | 0.69% | 0.09% | |
| Euro | 0.09% | 0.26% | 0.09% |
0.08% | 0.44% | 0.08% | |
0.08% | 0.39% | 0.08% | |
0.08% | 0.44% | 0.08% | |
0.08% | 0.39% | 0.08% | |
0.07% | 0.37% | 0.07% | |
0.06% | 0.32% | 0.06% | |
0.06% | 0.33% | 0.06% | |
0.06% | 0.31% | 0.06% |
Frequently Asked Questions
How much do EFG and EWG overlap?
EFG and EWG overlap by 9.5% of portfolio weight. They share 31 holdings (EFG holds 383 positions and EWG holds 55), based on each fund's latest SEC-reported holdings.
Is it redundant to own both EFG and EWG?
The two portfolios are 9.5% identical by weight. Owning both is not redundant. Most of each portfolio is distinct, so the funds can serve different roles.
What are the biggest shared holdings of EFG and EWG?
The largest positions held by both funds are SAP, ENR, IFX, SIE and RHM. Together the top 10 shared positions account for 81% of the total overlap.
What does EFG own that EWG doesn't?
352 positions (90.0% of EFG) are unique to EFG, led by ASML, AZN and NOVN. In the other direction, 24 positions (34.3% of EWG) are unique to EWG.