EFG vs EZU: Holdings Overlap
EFGiShares MSCI EAFE Growth ETF
iShares · 383 holdings · $17.1B · as of 2026-04-30
iShares · 226 holdings · $9.8B · as of 2026-05-31
Holdings snapshots are 31 days apart (EFG: 2026-04-30, EZU: 2026-05-31). Weights and index membership change between snapshots, so the true current overlap is typically higher than shown. For funds tracking the same index, the gap can be 5–15 points.
How similar are EFG and EZU?
iShares MSCI EAFE Growth ETF (EFG, by iShares) holds 383 positions; iShares MSCI Eurozone ETF (EZU, by iShares) holds 226. They have 110 holdings in common, and by portfolio weight the two funds are 35.9% identical. In practical terms the pair is moderately overlapping; they share a meaningful core, but each fund adds distinct exposure.
- Overlap by Weight
- 35.9%Sum of the smaller weight of each shared holding
- Shared Holdings
- 110EFG holds 383 · EZU holds 226
- Weight in Shared Holdings
- EFG 36%·EZU 57%Share of each fund's weight in stocks both funds own
Based on each fund's latest official holdings. How is this calculated?
What makes each fund different
Only in EFG
273 of 383 positions (63.6% of the fund) are not held by EZU. Showing the top 30 by weight.
Sector Breakdown
| Sector | EFG | EZU |
|---|---|---|
| Industrials | 28.8% | 19.2% |
| Financials | 10.6% | 23.5% |
| Information Technology | 16.1% | 15.4% |
| Health Care | 13.3% | 5.2% |
| Consumer Discretionary | 8.7% | 6.9% |
| Other Sectors | 15.7% | 24.2% |
| Unclassified | 6.4% | 5.4% |
Share of each fund's portfolio weight by GICS-style sector, compiled from issuer fund data and our own classification of the holdings, not the issuers' published sector charts. “Unclassified” is weight we could not classify (6% of EFG, 5% of EZU).
Performance
| Fund | 1M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y (ann.) | 5Y (ann.) | 10Y (ann.) | Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EFG | +3.0% | +11.7% | +17.6% | +12.3% | +4.5% | +8.2% | 2.21% |
| EZU | +4.0% | +13.7% | +23.6% | +19.3% | +10.3% | +10.8% | 2.57% |
Total returns including dividends, from adjusted daily closes as of 2026-08-07. 3Y/5Y/10Y are annualized. Yield is trailing-12-month distributions over the last close. Past performance does not predict future results.
Project the growth of $10,000 in EFG vs EZU →
Shared Holdings(110)
The top 10 shared positions account for 48% of the overlap, led by ASML, SU and SAP.
5.46% | 8.09% | 5.46% | |
1.70% | 2.22% | 1.70% | |
1.70% | 2.43% | 1.70% | |
1.60% | 1.89% | 1.60% | |
1.29% | 1.75% | 1.29% | |
1.21% | 1.54% | 1.21% | |
1.19% | 1.60% | 1.19% | |
1.11% | 1.63% | 1.11% | |
1.01% | 1.37% | 1.01% | |
0.85% | 1.60% | 0.85% | |
0.77% | 3.07% | 0.77% | |
0.74% | 1.02% | 0.74% | |
0.73% | 0.93% | 0.73% | |
0.71% | 0.89% | 0.71% | |
0.63% | 0.87% | 0.63% | |
0.62% | 0.77% | 0.62% | |
0.62% | 0.78% | 0.62% | |
0.59% | 0.76% | 0.59% | |
0.56% | 0.70% | 0.56% | |
0.48% | 0.61% | 0.48% | |
0.47% | 0.67% | 0.47% | |
0.46% | 0.58% | 0.46% | |
0.45% | 0.63% | 0.45% | |
0.42% | 0.56% | 0.42% | |
0.42% | 0.63% | 0.42% |
Frequently Asked Questions
How much do EFG and EZU overlap?
EFG and EZU overlap by 35.9% of portfolio weight. They share 110 holdings (EFG holds 383 positions and EZU holds 226), based on each fund's latest SEC-reported holdings.
Is it redundant to own both EFG and EZU?
The two portfolios are 35.9% identical by weight. Owning both is defensible: they share a meaningful core, but each fund adds exposure the other lacks.
What are the biggest shared holdings of EFG and EZU?
The largest positions held by both funds are ASML, SU, SAP, ENR and MC. Together the top 10 shared positions account for 48% of the total overlap.
What does EFG own that EZU doesn't?
273 positions (63.6% of EFG) are unique to EFG, led by AZN, NOVN and ABBN. In the other direction, 116 positions (42.9% of EZU) are unique to EZU.