EFG vs IPAC: Holdings Overlap
EFGiShares MSCI EAFE Growth ETF
iShares · 383 holdings · $17.1B · as of 2026-04-30
IPACiShares Core MSCI Pacific ETF
iShares · 1375 holdings · $2.7B · as of 2026-04-30
How similar are EFG and IPAC?
iShares MSCI EAFE Growth ETF (EFG, by iShares) holds 383 positions; iShares Core MSCI Pacific ETF (IPAC, by iShares) holds 1375. They have 147 holdings in common, and by portfolio weight the two funds are 33.3% identical. In practical terms the pair is moderately overlapping; they share a meaningful core, but each fund adds distinct exposure.
- Overlap by Weight
- 33.3%Sum of the smaller weight of each shared holding
- Shared Holdings
- 147EFG holds 383 · IPAC holds 1375
- Weight in Shared Holdings
- EFG 33%·IPAC 42%Share of each fund's weight in stocks both funds own
Based on each fund's latest official holdings. How is this calculated?
What makes each fund different
Only in EFG
236 of 383 positions (66.1% of the fund) are not held by IPAC. Showing the top 30 by weight.
Only in IPAC
1228 of 1375 positions (56.9% of the fund) are not held by EFG. Showing the top 30 by weight.
Sector Breakdown
| Sector | EFG | IPAC |
|---|---|---|
| Industrials | 28.8% | 15.3% |
| Financials | 10.6% | 20.1% |
| Information Technology | 16.1% | 9.0% |
| Health Care | 13.3% | 4.1% |
| Consumer Discretionary | 8.7% | 7.5% |
| Other Sectors | 15.7% | 21.1% |
| Unclassified | 6.4% | 22.2% |
Share of each fund's portfolio weight by GICS-style sector, compiled from issuer fund data and our own classification of the holdings, not the issuers' published sector charts. “Unclassified” is weight we could not classify (6% of EFG, 22% of IPAC).
Performance
| Fund | 1M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y (ann.) | 5Y (ann.) | 10Y (ann.) | Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EFG | +3.0% | +11.7% | +17.6% | +12.3% | +4.5% | +8.2% | 2.21% |
| IPAC | +4.8% | +18.9% | +27.2% | +18.2% | +9.0% | +9.1% | 3.71% |
Total returns including dividends, from adjusted daily closes as of 2026-08-07. 3Y/5Y/10Y are annualized. Yield is trailing-12-month distributions over the last close. Past performance does not predict future results.
Project the growth of $10,000 in EFG vs IPAC →
Shared Holdings(147)
The top 10 shared positions account for 31% of the overlap, led by 6501, 6857 and CBA.
1.41% | 1.59% | 1.41% | |
1.39% | 1.56% | 1.39% | |
1.33% | 2.30% | 1.33% | |
1.28% | 1.44% | 1.28% | |
0.93% | 1.04% | 0.93% | |
0.87% | 0.98% | 0.87% | |
0.87% | 0.98% | 0.87% | |
0.80% | 1.38% | 0.80% | |
0.78% | 1.34% | 0.78% | |
0.76% | 0.85% | 0.76% | |
0.75% | 1.25% | 0.75% | |
0.75% | 0.83% | 0.75% | |
0.72% | 0.80% | 0.72% | |
0.63% | 0.71% | 0.63% | |
0.61% | 0.69% | 0.61% | |
0.61% | 0.68% | 0.61% | |
0.59% | 0.66% | 0.59% | |
0.58% | 1.05% | 0.58% | |
0.57% | 0.63% | 0.57% | |
0.53% | 0.92% | 0.53% | |
0.53% | 0.59% | 0.53% | |
0.45% | 0.51% | 0.45% | |
0.43% | 0.48% | 0.43% | |
0.43% | 0.59% | 0.43% | |
0.43% | 0.48% | 0.43% |
Frequently Asked Questions
How much do EFG and IPAC overlap?
EFG and IPAC overlap by 33.3% of portfolio weight. They share 147 holdings (EFG holds 383 positions and IPAC holds 1375), based on each fund's latest SEC-reported holdings.
Is it redundant to own both EFG and IPAC?
The two portfolios are 33.3% identical by weight. Owning both is defensible: they share a meaningful core, but each fund adds exposure the other lacks.
What are the biggest shared holdings of EFG and IPAC?
The largest positions held by both funds are 6501, 6857, CBA, 8035 and 7011. Together the top 10 shared positions account for 31% of the total overlap.
What does EFG own that IPAC doesn't?
236 positions (66.1% of EFG) are unique to EFG, led by ASML, AZN and NOVN. In the other direction, 1228 positions (56.9% of IPAC) are unique to IPAC.