EFG vs IXJ: Holdings Overlap
EFGiShares MSCI EAFE Growth ETF
iShares · 383 holdings · $17.1B · as of 2026-04-30
IXJiShares Global Healthcare ETF
iShares · 123 holdings · $4.1B · as of 2026-03-31
Holdings snapshots are 30 days apart (EFG: 2026-04-30, IXJ: 2026-03-31). Weights and index membership change between snapshots, so the true current overlap is typically higher than shown. For funds tracking the same index, the gap can be 5–15 points.
How similar are EFG and IXJ?
iShares MSCI EAFE Growth ETF (EFG, by iShares) holds 383 positions; iShares Global Healthcare ETF (IXJ, by iShares) holds 123. They have 42 holdings in common, and by portfolio weight the two funds are 13.4% identical. In practical terms the pair is lightly overlapping, with most of each portfolio distinct.
- Overlap by Weight
- 13.4%Sum of the smaller weight of each shared holding
- Shared Holdings
- 42EFG holds 383 · IXJ holds 123
- Weight in Shared Holdings
- EFG 14%·IXJ 19%Share of each fund's weight in stocks both funds own
Based on each fund's latest official holdings. How is this calculated?
What makes each fund different
Only in EFG
341 of 383 positions (86.0% of the fund) are not held by IXJ. Showing the top 30 by weight.
Sector Breakdown
| Sector | EFG | IXJ |
|---|---|---|
| Health Care | 13.3% | 98.9% |
| Industrials | 28.8% | 0.0% |
| Information Technology | 16.1% | 0.0% |
| Financials | 10.6% | 0.0% |
| Consumer Discretionary | 8.7% | 0.0% |
| Other Sectors | 15.7% | 0.7% |
| Unclassified | 6.4% | 0.0% |
Share of each fund's portfolio weight by GICS-style sector, compiled from issuer fund data and our own classification of the holdings, not the issuers' published sector charts. “Unclassified” is weight we could not classify (6% of EFG, 0% of IXJ).
Performance
| Fund | 1M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y (ann.) | 5Y (ann.) | 10Y (ann.) | Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EFG | +3.0% | +11.7% | +17.6% | +12.3% | +4.5% | +8.2% | 2.21% |
| IXJ | +0.7% | +5.9% | +25.5% | +7.8% | +4.8% | +8.5% | 1.41% |
Total returns including dividends, from adjusted daily closes as of 2026-08-07. 3Y/5Y/10Y are annualized. Yield is trailing-12-month distributions over the last close. Past performance does not predict future results.
Project the growth of $10,000 in EFG vs IXJ →
Shared Holdings(42)
The top 10 shared positions account for 76% of the overlap, led by AZN, NOVN and NOVOB.
2.86% | 4.02% | 2.86% | |
2.73% | 3.87% | 2.73% | |
1.33% | 1.55% | 1.33% | |
0.62% | 0.90% | 0.62% | |
0.61% | 0.78% | 0.61% | |
0.47% | 0.60% | 0.47% | |
0.43% | 0.63% | 0.43% | |
0.42% | 0.60% | 0.42% | |
0.38% | 0.48% | 0.38% | |
0.36% | 0.50% | 0.36% | |
0.35% | 0.47% | 0.35% | |
0.34% | 0.48% | 0.34% | |
0.33% | 0.46% | 0.33% | |
0.31% | 0.49% | 0.31% | |
0.29% | 0.45% | 0.29% | |
0.17% | 0.26% | 0.17% | |
0.16% | 0.23% | 0.16% | |
0.12% | 0.18% | 0.12% | |
0.12% | 0.16% | 0.12% | |
0.11% | 0.15% | 0.11% | |
0.10% | 0.14% | 0.10% | |
0.09% | 0.16% | 0.09% | |
0.07% | 0.28% | 0.07% | |
0.07% | 0.08% | 0.07% | |
0.07% | 0.16% | 0.07% |
Frequently Asked Questions
How much do EFG and IXJ overlap?
EFG and IXJ overlap by 13.4% of portfolio weight. They share 42 holdings (EFG holds 383 positions and IXJ holds 123), based on each fund's latest SEC-reported holdings.
Is it redundant to own both EFG and IXJ?
The two portfolios are 13.4% identical by weight. Owning both is not redundant. Most of each portfolio is distinct, so the funds can serve different roles.
What are the biggest shared holdings of EFG and IXJ?
The largest positions held by both funds are AZN, NOVN, NOVOB, EL and 7741. Together the top 10 shared positions account for 76% of the total overlap.
What does EFG own that IXJ doesn't?
341 positions (86.0% of EFG) are unique to EFG, led by ASML, SU and SAP. In the other direction, 81 positions (80.6% of IXJ) are unique to IXJ.