EFV vs GNR: Holdings Overlap
EFViShares MSCI EAFE Value ETF
iShares · 419 holdings · $29.6B · as of 2026-04-30
GNRState Street® SPDR® S&P® Global Natural Resources ETF
State Street (SPDR) · 94 holdings · $4.8B · as of 2026-08-06
Holdings snapshots are 98 days apart (EFV: 2026-04-30, GNR: 2026-08-06). Weights and index membership change between snapshots, so the true current overlap is typically higher than shown. For funds tracking the same index, the gap can be 5–15 points.
How similar are EFV and GNR?
iShares MSCI EAFE Value ETF (EFV, by iShares) holds 419 positions; State Street® SPDR® S&P® Global Natural Resources ETF (GNR, by State Street (SPDR)) holds 94. They have 20 holdings in common, and by portfolio weight the two funds are 10.5% identical. In practical terms the pair is lightly overlapping, with most of each portfolio distinct.
- Overlap by Weight
- 10.5%Sum of the smaller weight of each shared holding
- Shared Holdings
- 20EFV holds 419 · GNR holds 94
- Weight in Shared Holdings
- EFV 11%·GNR 32%Share of each fund's weight in stocks both funds own
Based on each fund's latest official holdings. How is this calculated?
What makes each fund different
Only in EFV
399 of 419 positions (88.7% of the fund) are not held by GNR. Showing the top 30 by weight.
Sector Breakdown
| Sector | EFV | GNR |
|---|---|---|
| Materials | 7.1% | 57.3% |
| Financials | 35.7% | 0.0% |
| Energy | 7.3% | 32.0% |
| Industrials | 9.3% | 0.0% |
| Consumer Staples | 8.4% | 3.6% |
| Other Sectors | 26.4% | 1.0% |
| Unclassified | 4.9% | 5.5% |
Share of each fund's portfolio weight by GICS-style sector, compiled from issuer fund data and our own classification of the holdings, not the issuers' published sector charts. “Unclassified” is weight we could not classify (5% of EFV, 6% of GNR).
Performance
| Fund | 1M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y (ann.) | 5Y (ann.) | 10Y (ann.) | Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EFV | +5.3% | +18.3% | +32.4% | +23.4% | +14.6% | +10.7% | 4.44% |
| GNR | +9.0% | +20.6% | +37.3% | +13.2% | +11.1% | +10.4% | 2.46% |
Total returns including dividends, from adjusted daily closes as of 2026-08-07. 3Y/5Y/10Y are annualized. Yield is trailing-12-month distributions over the last close. Past performance does not predict future results.
Project the growth of $10,000 in EFV vs GNR →
Shared Holdings(20)
The top 10 shared positions account for 88% of the overlap, led by SHEL, BHP and TTE.
2.27% | 4.37% | 2.27% | |
1.76% | 5.32% | 1.76% | |
1.62% | 3.01% | 1.62% | |
1.09% | 1.89% | 1.09% | |
0.68% | 1.74% | 0.68% | |
0.51% | 0.97% | 0.51% | |
0.40% | 0.73% | 0.40% | |
0.40% | 1.11% | 0.40% | |
0.32% | 1.52% | 0.32% | |
0.27% | 0.56% | 0.27% | |
0.27% | 0.56% | 0.27% | |
0.21% | 0.52% | 0.21% | |
0.16% | 0.56% | 0.16% | |
0.14% | 0.75% | 0.14% | |
0.14% | 2.75% | 0.14% | |
0.08% | 1.39% | 0.08% | |
0.06% | 1.31% | 0.06% | |
0.06% | 1.33% | 0.06% | |
0.05% | 0.29% | 0.05% | |
0.05% | 1.56% | 0.05% |
Frequently Asked Questions
How much do EFV and GNR overlap?
EFV and GNR overlap by 10.5% of portfolio weight. They share 20 holdings (EFV holds 419 positions and GNR holds 94), based on each fund's latest SEC-reported holdings.
Is it redundant to own both EFV and GNR?
The two portfolios are 10.5% identical by weight. Owning both is not redundant. Most of each portfolio is distinct, so the funds can serve different roles.
What are the biggest shared holdings of EFV and GNR?
The largest positions held by both funds are SHEL, BHP, TTE, BP- and GLENPEN. Together the top 10 shared positions account for 88% of the total overlap.
What does EFV own that GNR doesn't?
399 positions (88.7% of EFV) are unique to EFV, led by HSBA, ROP and NESN. In the other direction, 74 positions (67.1% of GNR) are unique to GNR.