EFV vs ICLN: Holdings Overlap
EFViShares MSCI EAFE Value ETF
iShares · 419 holdings · $29.6B · as of 2026-04-30
ICLNiShares Global Clean Energy ETF
iShares · 123 holdings · $2.3B · as of 2026-04-30
How similar are EFV and ICLN?
iShares MSCI EAFE Value ETF (EFV, by iShares) holds 419 positions; iShares Global Clean Energy ETF (ICLN, by iShares) holds 123. They have 14 holdings in common, and by portfolio weight the two funds are 0.5% identical. In practical terms the pair is essentially distinct, holding almost none of the same securities.
- Overlap by Weight
- 0.5%Sum of the smaller weight of each shared holding
- Shared Holdings
- 14EFV holds 419 · ICLN holds 123
- Weight in Shared Holdings
- EFV 1%·ICLN 7%Share of each fund's weight in stocks both funds own
Based on each fund's latest official holdings. How is this calculated?
What makes each fund different
Only in EFV
405 of 419 positions (98.5% of the fund) are not held by ICLN. Showing the top 30 by weight.
Only in ICLN
109 of 123 positions (92.7% of the fund) are not held by EFV. Showing the top 30 by weight.
Sector Breakdown
| Sector | EFV | ICLN |
|---|---|---|
| Financials | 35.7% | 0.0% |
| Industrials | 9.3% | 32.4% |
| Utilities | 6.3% | 19.4% |
| Information Technology | 2.8% | 12.3% |
| Consumer Staples | 8.4% | 0.0% |
| Other Sectors | 31.8% | 1.3% |
| Unclassified | 4.9% | 34.0% |
Share of each fund's portfolio weight by GICS-style sector, compiled from issuer fund data and our own classification of the holdings, not the issuers' published sector charts. “Unclassified” is weight we could not classify (5% of EFV, 34% of ICLN).
Performance
| Fund | 1M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y (ann.) | 5Y (ann.) | 10Y (ann.) | Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EFV | +5.3% | +18.3% | +32.4% | +23.4% | +14.6% | +10.7% | 4.44% |
| ICLN | -5.3% | +11.7% | +34.9% | +4.0% | -3.1% | +8.9% | 1.01% |
Total returns including dividends, from adjusted daily closes as of 2026-08-07. 3Y/5Y/10Y are annualized. Yield is trailing-12-month distributions over the last close. Past performance does not predict future results.
Project the growth of $10,000 in EFV vs ICLN →
Shared Holdings(14)
The top 10 shared positions account for 99% of the overlap, led by EDP, ORSTED and 9502.
0.15% | 2.33% | 0.15% | |
0.12% | 1.83% | 0.12% | |
0.10% | 2.01% | 0.10% | |
0.05% | 0.26% | 0.05% | |
0.04% | 0.22% | 0.04% | |
| Euro | 0.14% | 0.02% | 0.02% |
| HONG KONG DOLLAR | 0.00% | 0.02% | 0.00% |
| JAPANESE YEN | 0.01% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
| GREAT BRITISH POUND | 0.01% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
| ISRAELI SHEKEL | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
| DANISH KRONER | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
| NEW ZEALAND DOLLAR | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
| SWEDISH KRONE | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
| SWISS FRANC | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
How much do EFV and ICLN overlap?
EFV and ICLN overlap by 0.5% of portfolio weight. They share 14 holdings (EFV holds 419 positions and ICLN holds 123), based on each fund's latest SEC-reported holdings.
Is it redundant to own both EFV and ICLN?
The two portfolios are 0.5% identical by weight. Owning both is genuine diversification: the funds hold almost none of the same securities.
What are the biggest shared holdings of EFV and ICLN?
The largest positions held by both funds are EDP, ORSTED, 9502, CEN and MEL. Together the top 10 shared positions account for 99% of the total overlap.
What does EFV own that ICLN doesn't?
405 positions (98.5% of EFV) are unique to EFV, led by HSBA, ROP and NESN. In the other direction, 109 positions (92.7% of ICLN) are unique to ICLN.