EMLP vs KOMP: Holdings Overlap
EMLPFirst Trust North American Energy Infrastructure Fund
First Trust · 63 holdings · $4.2B · as of 2026-04-30
KOMPState Street® SPDR® S&P Kensho New Economies Composite ETF
State Street (SPDR) · 501 holdings · $2.6B · as of 2026-08-06
Holdings snapshots are 98 days apart (EMLP: 2026-04-30, KOMP: 2026-08-06). Weights and index membership change between snapshots, so the true current overlap is typically higher than shown. For funds tracking the same index, the gap can be 5–15 points.
How similar are EMLP and KOMP?
First Trust North American Energy Infrastructure Fund (EMLP, by First Trust) holds 63 positions; State Street® SPDR® S&P Kensho New Economies Composite ETF (KOMP, by State Street (SPDR)) holds 501. They have 6 holdings in common, and by portfolio weight the two funds are 1.7% identical. In practical terms the pair is essentially distinct, holding almost none of the same securities.
- Overlap by Weight
- 1.7%Sum of the smaller weight of each shared holding
- Shared Holdings
- 6EMLP holds 63 · KOMP holds 501
- Weight in Shared Holdings
- EMLP 4%·KOMP 2%Share of each fund's weight in stocks both funds own
Based on each fund's latest official holdings. How is this calculated?
What makes each fund different
Only in EMLP
57 of 63 positions (89.0% of the fund) are not held by KOMP. Showing the top 30 by weight.
Only in KOMP
495 of 501 positions (98.2% of the fund) are not held by EMLP. Showing the top 30 by weight.
Sector Breakdown
| Sector | EMLP | KOMP |
|---|---|---|
| Utilities | 45.6% | 1.9% |
| Energy | 39.5% | 1.2% |
| Information Technology | 0.0% | 29.9% |
| Industrials | 3.6% | 27.4% |
| Health Care | 0.0% | 12.4% |
| Other Sectors | 0.0% | 12.8% |
| Unclassified | 4.4% | 14.3% |
Share of each fund's portfolio weight by GICS-style sector, compiled from issuer fund data and our own classification of the holdings, not the issuers' published sector charts. “Unclassified” is weight we could not classify (5% of EMLP, 14% of KOMP).
Performance
| Fund | 1M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y (ann.) | 5Y (ann.) | 10Y (ann.) | Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EMLP | -1.5% | +16.3% | +17.6% | +20.5% | +16.2% | +9.9% | 2.80% |
| KOMP | +3.5% | +18.5% | +29.5% | +17.6% | +3.3% | — | 1.47% |
Total returns including dividends, from adjusted daily closes as of 2026-08-07. 3Y/5Y/10Y are annualized. Yield is trailing-12-month distributions over the last close. Past performance does not predict future results.
Project the growth of $10,000 in EMLP vs KOMP →
Shared Holdings(6)
The top 6 shared positions account for 100% of the overlap, led by GNRC, CEG and AES.
1.08% | 0.48% | 0.48% | |
0.40% | 0.36% | 0.36% | |
0.41% | 0.31% | 0.31% | |
1.27% | 0.29% | 0.29% | |
0.80% | 0.13% | 0.13% | |
0.12% | 0.14% | 0.12% |
Frequently Asked Questions
How much do EMLP and KOMP overlap?
EMLP and KOMP overlap by 1.7% of portfolio weight. They share 6 holdings (EMLP holds 63 positions and KOMP holds 501), based on each fund's latest SEC-reported holdings.
Is it redundant to own both EMLP and KOMP?
The two portfolios are 1.7% identical by weight. Owning both is genuine diversification: the funds hold almost none of the same securities.
What are the biggest shared holdings of EMLP and KOMP?
The largest positions held by both funds are GNRC, CEG, AES, NEE and CMI. Together the top 6 shared positions account for 100% of the total overlap.
What does EMLP own that KOMP doesn't?
57 positions (89.0% of EMLP) are unique to EMLP, led by Energy Transfer LP, Enterprise Products Partners LP and MPLX LP COM UNIT REP LTD. In the other direction, 495 positions (98.2% of KOMP) are unique to KOMP.