ESGD vs FLJP: Holdings Overlap
ESGDiShares ESG Aware MSCI EAFE ETF
iShares · 371 holdings · $12.2B · as of 2026-05-31
Franklin Templeton · 477 holdings · $4.0B · as of 2026-03-31
Holdings snapshots are 61 days apart (ESGD: 2026-05-31, FLJP: 2026-03-31). Weights and index membership change between snapshots, so the true current overlap is typically higher than shown. For funds tracking the same index, the gap can be 5–15 points.
How similar are ESGD and FLJP?
iShares ESG Aware MSCI EAFE ETF (ESGD, by iShares) holds 371 positions; Franklin FTSE Japan ETF (FLJP, by Franklin Templeton) holds 477. They have 90 holdings in common, and by portfolio weight the two funds are 22.4% identical. In practical terms the pair is lightly overlapping, with most of each portfolio distinct.
- Overlap by Weight
- 22.4%Sum of the smaller weight of each shared holding
- Shared Holdings
- 90ESGD holds 371 · FLJP holds 477
- Weight in Shared Holdings
- ESGD 23%·FLJP 63%Share of each fund's weight in stocks both funds own
Based on each fund's latest official holdings. How is this calculated?
What makes each fund different
Only in ESGD
281 of 371 positions (76.0% of the fund) are not held by FLJP. Showing the top 30 by weight.
Sector Breakdown
| Sector | ESGD | FLJP |
|---|---|---|
| Financials | 25.4% | 13.7% |
| Industrials | 18.0% | 21.1% |
| Information Technology | 11.2% | 10.9% |
| Consumer Discretionary | 5.9% | 10.9% |
| Health Care | 9.7% | 5.6% |
| Other Sectors | 24.3% | 17.1% |
| Unclassified | 4.9% | 19.7% |
Share of each fund's portfolio weight by GICS-style sector, compiled from issuer fund data and our own classification of the holdings, not the issuers' published sector charts. “Unclassified” is weight we could not classify (5% of ESGD, 20% of FLJP).
Performance
| Fund | 1M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y (ann.) | 5Y (ann.) | 10Y (ann.) | Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ESGD | +4.5% | +15.1% | +24.6% | +17.5% | +9.3% | — | 3.18% |
| FLJP | +3.6% | +20.2% | +30.8% | +19.4% | +10.2% | — | 4.10% |
Total returns including dividends, from adjusted daily closes as of 2026-08-07. 3Y/5Y/10Y are annualized. Yield is trailing-12-month distributions over the last close. Past performance does not predict future results.
Project the growth of $10,000 in ESGD vs FLJP →
Shared Holdings(90)
The top 10 shared positions account for 33% of the overlap, led by 9984, 8306 and 8035.
0.85% | 1.62% | 0.85% | |
0.82% | 3.32% | 0.82% | |
0.81% | 1.90% | 0.81% | |
0.81% | 2.11% | 0.81% | |
0.79% | 2.24% | 0.79% | |
0.77% | 2.25% | 0.77% | |
0.66% | 3.90% | 0.66% | |
0.62% | 1.70% | 0.62% | |
0.59% | 1.00% | 0.59% | |
0.58% | 1.44% | 0.58% | |
0.57% | 1.70% | 0.57% | |
0.50% | 0.87% | 0.50% | |
0.49% | 0.64% | 0.49% | |
0.48% | 2.02% | 0.48% | |
0.45% | 0.67% | 0.45% | |
0.43% | 1.26% | 0.43% | |
0.43% | 1.53% | 0.43% | |
0.42% | 1.14% | 0.42% | |
0.57% | 0.41% | 0.41% | |
0.39% | 1.03% | 0.39% | |
0.38% | 0.57% | 0.38% | |
0.38% | 0.96% | 0.38% | |
0.33% | 1.57% | 0.33% | |
0.31% | 0.43% | 0.31% | |
0.30% | 0.63% | 0.30% |
Frequently Asked Questions
How much do ESGD and FLJP overlap?
ESGD and FLJP overlap by 22.4% of portfolio weight. They share 90 holdings (ESGD holds 371 positions and FLJP holds 477), based on each fund's latest SEC-reported holdings.
Is it redundant to own both ESGD and FLJP?
The two portfolios are 22.4% identical by weight. Owning both is not redundant. Most of each portfolio is distinct, so the funds can serve different roles.
What are the biggest shared holdings of ESGD and FLJP?
The largest positions held by both funds are 9984, 8306, 8035, 8316 and 6758. Together the top 10 shared positions account for 33% of the total overlap.
What does ESGD own that FLJP doesn't?
281 positions (76.0% of ESGD) are unique to ESGD, led by ASML, NOVN and HSBA. In the other direction, 387 positions (35.9% of FLJP) are unique to FLJP.