ESGD vs GNR: Holdings Overlap
ESGDiShares ESG Aware MSCI EAFE ETF
iShares · 371 holdings · $12.2B · as of 2026-05-31
GNRState Street® SPDR® S&P® Global Natural Resources ETF
State Street (SPDR) · 94 holdings · $4.8B · as of 2026-08-06
Holdings snapshots are 67 days apart (ESGD: 2026-05-31, GNR: 2026-08-06). Weights and index membership change between snapshots, so the true current overlap is typically higher than shown. For funds tracking the same index, the gap can be 5–15 points.
How similar are ESGD and GNR?
iShares ESG Aware MSCI EAFE ETF (ESGD, by iShares) holds 371 positions; State Street® SPDR® S&P® Global Natural Resources ETF (GNR, by State Street (SPDR)) holds 94. They have 18 holdings in common, and by portfolio weight the two funds are 5.2% identical. In practical terms the pair is lightly overlapping, with most of each portfolio distinct.
- Overlap by Weight
- 5.2%Sum of the smaller weight of each shared holding
- Shared Holdings
- 18ESGD holds 371 · GNR holds 94
- Weight in Shared Holdings
- ESGD 5%·GNR 29%Share of each fund's weight in stocks both funds own
Based on each fund's latest official holdings. How is this calculated?
What makes each fund different
Only in ESGD
353 of 371 positions (94.2% of the fund) are not held by GNR. Showing the top 30 by weight.
Sector Breakdown
| Sector | ESGD | GNR |
|---|---|---|
| Materials | 5.1% | 57.3% |
| Energy | 3.5% | 32.0% |
| Financials | 25.4% | 0.0% |
| Industrials | 18.0% | 0.0% |
| Information Technology | 11.2% | 0.0% |
| Other Sectors | 31.2% | 4.6% |
| Unclassified | 4.9% | 5.5% |
Share of each fund's portfolio weight by GICS-style sector, compiled from issuer fund data and our own classification of the holdings, not the issuers' published sector charts. “Unclassified” is weight we could not classify (5% of ESGD, 6% of GNR).
Performance
| Fund | 1M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y (ann.) | 5Y (ann.) | 10Y (ann.) | Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ESGD | +4.5% | +15.1% | +24.6% | +17.5% | +9.3% | — | 3.18% |
| GNR | +9.0% | +20.6% | +37.3% | +13.2% | +11.1% | +10.4% | 2.46% |
Total returns including dividends, from adjusted daily closes as of 2026-08-07. 3Y/5Y/10Y are annualized. Yield is trailing-12-month distributions over the last close. Past performance does not predict future results.
Project the growth of $10,000 in ESGD vs GNR →
Shared Holdings(18)
The top 10 shared positions account for 80% of the overlap, led by BHP, SHEL and TTE.
0.92% | 5.32% | 0.92% | |
0.88% | 4.37% | 0.88% | |
0.67% | 3.01% | 0.67% | |
0.35% | 0.73% | 0.35% | |
0.24% | 0.97% | 0.24% | |
0.23% | 0.56% | 0.23% | |
0.23% | 1.52% | 0.23% | |
0.22% | 1.89% | 0.22% | |
0.21% | 1.74% | 0.21% | |
0.18% | 1.31% | 0.18% | |
0.18% | 2.75% | 0.18% | |
0.17% | 0.44% | 0.17% | |
0.15% | 0.56% | 0.15% | |
0.14% | 0.29% | 0.14% | |
0.12% | 0.52% | 0.12% | |
0.11% | 1.56% | 0.11% | |
0.10% | 0.54% | 0.10% | |
0.09% | 1.33% | 0.09% |
Frequently Asked Questions
How much do ESGD and GNR overlap?
ESGD and GNR overlap by 5.2% of portfolio weight. They share 18 holdings (ESGD holds 371 positions and GNR holds 94), based on each fund's latest SEC-reported holdings.
Is it redundant to own both ESGD and GNR?
The two portfolios are 5.2% identical by weight. Owning both is not redundant. Most of each portfolio is distinct, so the funds can serve different roles.
What are the biggest shared holdings of ESGD and GNR?
The largest positions held by both funds are BHP, SHEL, TTE, WDS and ENI. Together the top 10 shared positions account for 80% of the total overlap.
What does ESGD own that GNR doesn't?
353 positions (94.2% of ESGD) are unique to ESGD, led by ASML, NOVN and HSBA. In the other direction, 76 positions (69.9% of GNR) are unique to GNR.