ESGU vs ONEQ: Holdings Overlap
ESGUiShares ESG Aware MSCI USA ETF
iShares · 287 holdings · $18.3B · as of 2026-05-31
ONEQFidelity Nasdaq Composite Index ETF
Fidelity · 1022 holdings · $10.8B · as of 2026-05-31
How similar are ESGU and ONEQ?
iShares ESG Aware MSCI USA ETF (ESGU, by iShares) holds 287 positions; Fidelity Nasdaq Composite Index ETF (ONEQ, by Fidelity) holds 1022. They have 99 holdings in common, and by portfolio weight the two funds are 55.0% identical. In practical terms the pair is moderately overlapping; they share a meaningful core, but each fund adds distinct exposure.
- Overlap by Weight
- 55.0%Sum of the smaller weight of each shared holding
- Shared Holdings
- 99ESGU holds 287 · ONEQ holds 1022
- Weight in Shared Holdings
- ESGU 58%·ONEQ 81%Share of each fund's weight in stocks both funds own
Based on each fund's latest official holdings. How is this calculated?
What makes each fund different
Only in ESGU
188 of 287 positions (41.6% of the fund) are not held by ONEQ. Showing the top 30 by weight.
Only in ONEQ
923 of 1022 positions (18.6% of the fund) are not held by ESGU. Showing the top 30 by weight.
Sector Breakdown
| Sector | ESGU | ONEQ |
|---|---|---|
| Information Technology | 38.9% | 53.0% |
| Communication Services | 9.8% | 15.2% |
| Consumer Discretionary | 9.2% | 12.5% |
| Financials | 11.4% | 2.8% |
| Industrials | 8.9% | 3.1% |
| Other Sectors | 21.7% | 11.3% |
| Unclassified | 0.0% | 1.6% |
Share of each fund's portfolio weight by GICS-style sector, compiled from issuer fund data and our own classification of the holdings, not the issuers' published sector charts. “Unclassified” is weight we could not classify (0% of ESGU, 2% of ONEQ).
Performance
| Fund | 1M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y (ann.) | 5Y (ann.) | 10Y (ann.) | Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ESGU | +3.3% | +14.3% | +23.8% | +20.9% | +12.2% | — | 0.90% |
| ONEQ | +3.3% | +15.4% | +26.6% | +25.1% | +13.6% | +18.8% | 0.51% |
Total returns including dividends, from adjusted daily closes as of 2026-08-07. 3Y/5Y/10Y are annualized. Yield is trailing-12-month distributions over the last close. Past performance does not predict future results.
Project the growth of $10,000 in ESGU vs ONEQ →
Shared Holdings(99)
The top 10 shared positions account for 68% of the overlap, led by NVDA, AAPL and MSFT.
7.77% | 11.18% | 7.77% | |
6.83% | 9.98% | 6.83% | |
4.73% | 7.29% | 4.73% | |
4.72% | 4.46% | 4.46% | |
3.82% | 6.33% | 3.82% | |
3.07% | 4.61% | 3.07% | |
1.94% | 3.01% | 1.94% | |
1.85% | 3.56% | 1.85% | |
1.66% | 2.37% | 1.66% | |
1.33% | 1.83% | 1.33% | |
1.33% | 4.83% | 1.33% | |
0.85% | 1.24% | 0.85% | |
0.75% | 1.03% | 0.75% | |
0.72% | 0.77% | 0.72% | |
0.71% | 0.86% | 0.71% | |
0.61% | 0.92% | 0.61% | |
0.54% | 0.50% | 0.50% | |
0.47% | 0.78% | 0.47% | |
0.45% | 0.60% | 0.45% | |
0.44% | 0.79% | 0.44% | |
0.39% | 0.44% | 0.39% | |
0.43% | 0.39% | 0.39% | |
0.36% | 0.36% | 0.36% | |
0.35% | 0.42% | 0.35% | |
0.34% | 0.58% | 0.34% |
Frequently Asked Questions
How much do ESGU and ONEQ overlap?
ESGU and ONEQ overlap by 55.0% of portfolio weight. They share 99 holdings (ESGU holds 287 positions and ONEQ holds 1022), based on each fund's latest SEC-reported holdings.
Is it redundant to own both ESGU and ONEQ?
The two portfolios are 55.0% identical by weight. Owning both is defensible: they share a meaningful core, but each fund adds exposure the other lacks.
What are the biggest shared holdings of ESGU and ONEQ?
The largest positions held by both funds are NVDA, AAPL, MSFT, GOOG and AMZN. Together the top 10 shared positions account for 68% of the total overlap.
What does ESGU own that ONEQ doesn't?
188 positions (41.6% of ESGU) are unique to ESGU, led by LLY, JPM and V. In the other direction, 923 positions (18.6% of ONEQ) are unique to ONEQ.