EWC vs BBCA: Holdings Overlap
iShares · 84 holdings · $6.2B · as of 2026-05-31
BBCAJPMorgan BetaBuilders Canada ETF
JPMorgan · 76 holdings · $10.9B · as of 2026-04-30
Holdings snapshots are 31 days apart (EWC: 2026-05-31, BBCA: 2026-04-30). Weights and index membership change between snapshots, so the true current overlap is typically higher than shown. For funds tracking the same index, the gap can be 5–15 points.
How similar are EWC and BBCA?
iShares MSCI Canada ETF (EWC, by iShares) holds 84 positions; JPMorgan BetaBuilders Canada ETF (BBCA, by JPMorgan) holds 76. They have 73 holdings in common, and by portfolio weight the two funds are 94.3% identical. In practical terms the pair is essentially interchangeable, so holding both adds little diversification.
- Overlap by Weight
- 94.3%Sum of the smaller weight of each shared holding
- Shared Holdings
- 73EWC holds 84 · BBCA holds 76
- Weight in Shared Holdings
- EWC 97%·BBCA 97%Share of each fund's weight in stocks both funds own
Based on each fund's latest official holdings. How is this calculated?
What makes each fund different
Only in EWC
11 of 84 positions (3.3% of the fund) are not held by BBCA.
Sector Breakdown
| Sector | EWC | BBCA |
|---|---|---|
| Financials | 37.4% | 36.7% |
| Energy | 17.1% | 17.5% |
| Materials | 15.5% | 14.6% |
| Information Technology | 8.2% | 8.4% |
| Industrials | 5.5% | 7.5% |
| Other Sectors | 9.3% | 9.4% |
| Unclassified | 6.9% | 5.2% |
Share of each fund's portfolio weight by GICS-style sector, compiled from issuer fund data and our own classification of the holdings, not the issuers' published sector charts. “Unclassified” is weight we could not classify (7% of EWC, 5% of BBCA).
Performance
| Fund | 1M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y (ann.) | 5Y (ann.) | 10Y (ann.) | Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EWC | +5.0% | +14.2% | +31.3% | +22.9% | +12.6% | +11.6% | 1.22% |
| BBCA | +5.0% | +14.6% | +30.6% | +22.7% | +12.8% | — | 1.68% |
Total returns including dividends, from adjusted daily closes as of 2026-08-07. 3Y/5Y/10Y are annualized. Yield is trailing-12-month distributions over the last close. Past performance does not predict future results.
Project the growth of $10,000 in EWC vs BBCA →
Shared Holdings(73)
The top 10 shared positions account for 44% of the overlap, led by RY, TD and SHOP.
8.71% | 8.39% | 8.39% | |
6.28% | 6.02% | 6.02% | |
4.74% | 4.94% | 4.74% | |
3.89% | 4.02% | 3.89% | |
3.74% | 3.58% | 3.58% | |
3.30% | 3.44% | 3.30% | |
3.22% | 3.19% | 3.19% | |
3.08% | 3.25% | 3.08% | |
3.00% | 3.14% | 3.00% | |
3.05% | 2.76% | 2.76% | |
2.60% | 2.61% | 2.60% | |
2.44% | 2.74% | 2.44% | |
2.25% | 2.31% | 2.25% | |
2.34% | 2.19% | 2.19% | |
2.09% | 2.20% | 2.09% | |
2.02% | 2.04% | 2.02% | |
1.98% | 1.91% | 1.91% | |
1.85% | 1.97% | 1.85% | |
1.59% | 1.71% | 1.59% | |
1.45% | 1.56% | 1.45% | |
1.45% | 1.40% | 1.40% | |
1.35% | 1.37% | 1.35% | |
1.29% | 1.33% | 1.29% | |
1.27% | 1.32% | 1.27% | |
1.34% | 1.26% | 1.26% |
Frequently Asked Questions
How much do EWC and BBCA overlap?
EWC and BBCA overlap by 94.3% of portfolio weight. They share 73 holdings (EWC holds 84 positions and BBCA holds 76), based on each fund's latest SEC-reported holdings.
Is it redundant to own both EWC and BBCA?
The two portfolios are 94.3% identical by weight. Owning both is largely redundant: they are close to the same portfolio, so a second position mostly duplicates the first.
What are the biggest shared holdings of EWC and BBCA?
The largest positions held by both funds are RY, TD, SHOP, ENB and BMO. Together the top 10 shared positions account for 44% of the total overlap.
What does EWC own that BBCA doesn't?
11 positions (3.3% of EWC) are unique to EWC, led by AGI, WCP and TRI. In the other direction, 3 positions (2.1% of BBCA) are unique to BBCA.