EWC vs GDX: Holdings Overlap
iShares · 84 holdings · $6.2B · as of 2026-05-31
VanEck · 51 holdings · $23.7B · as of 2026-03-31
Holdings snapshots are 61 days apart (EWC: 2026-05-31, GDX: 2026-03-31). Weights and index membership change between snapshots, so the true current overlap is typically higher than shown. For funds tracking the same index, the gap can be 5–15 points.
How similar are EWC and GDX?
iShares MSCI Canada ETF (EWC, by iShares) holds 84 positions; VanEck Gold Miners ETF (GDX, by VanEck) holds 51. They have 8 holdings in common, and by portfolio weight the two funds are 11.6% identical. In practical terms the pair is lightly overlapping, with most of each portfolio distinct.
- Overlap by Weight
- 11.6%Sum of the smaller weight of each shared holding
- Shared Holdings
- 8EWC holds 84 · GDX holds 51
- Weight in Shared Holdings
- EWC 12%·GDX 41%Share of each fund's weight in stocks both funds own
Based on each fund's latest official holdings. How is this calculated?
What makes each fund different
Only in EWC
76 of 84 positions (88.3% of the fund) are not held by GDX. Showing the top 30 by weight.
Sector Breakdown
| Sector | EWC | GDX |
|---|---|---|
| Materials | 15.5% | 97.4% |
| Financials | 37.4% | 0.0% |
| Energy | 17.1% | 0.0% |
| Information Technology | 8.2% | 0.0% |
| Industrials | 5.5% | 0.0% |
| Other Sectors | 9.3% | 0.0% |
| Unclassified | 6.9% | 2.4% |
Share of each fund's portfolio weight by GICS-style sector, compiled from issuer fund data and our own classification of the holdings, not the issuers' published sector charts. “Unclassified” is weight we could not classify (7% of EWC, 2% of GDX).
Performance
| Fund | 1M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y (ann.) | 5Y (ann.) | 10Y (ann.) | Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EWC | +5.0% | +14.2% | +31.3% | +22.9% | +12.6% | +11.6% | 1.22% |
| GDX | +18.6% | +4.8% | +56.3% | +47.0% | +23.7% | +12.6% | 0.70% |
Total returns including dividends, from adjusted daily closes as of 2026-08-07. 3Y/5Y/10Y are annualized. Yield is trailing-12-month distributions over the last close. Past performance does not predict future results.
Project the growth of $10,000 in EWC vs GDX →
Shared Holdings(8)
The top 8 shared positions account for 100% of the overlap, led by AEM, ABX and WPM.
 AEMAgnico Eagle Mines Ltd | 3.00% | 12.08% | 3.00% |
|---|---|---|---|
 ABXBarrick Mining Corp | 2.34% | 7.63% | 2.34% |
 WPMWheaton Precious Metals Corp | 1.98% | 4.89% | 1.98% |
 FNVFranco-Nevada Corp | 1.45% | 5.16% | 1.45% |
 KUSDKinross Gold Corp | 1.19% | 4.68% | 1.19% |
 PAASPan American Silver Corp | 0.78% | 3.19% | 0.78% |
 AGIAlamos Gold Inc | 0.56% | 2.56% | 0.56% |
 LUGLundin Gold Inc | 0.24% | 1.26% | 0.24% |
Frequently Asked Questions
How much do EWC and GDX overlap?
EWC and GDX overlap by 11.6% of portfolio weight. They share 8 holdings (EWC holds 84 positions and GDX holds 51), based on each fund's latest SEC-reported holdings.
Is it redundant to own both EWC and GDX?
The two portfolios are 11.6% identical by weight. Owning both is not redundant. Most of each portfolio is distinct, so the funds can serve different roles.
What are the biggest shared holdings of EWC and GDX?
The largest positions held by both funds are AEM, ABX, WPM, FNV and KUSD. Together the top 8 shared positions account for 100% of the total overlap.
What does EWC own that GDX doesn't?
76 positions (88.3% of EWC) are unique to EWC, led by RY, TD and SHOP. In the other direction, 43 positions (58.3% of GDX) are unique to GDX.