EWC vs GNR: Holdings Overlap
iShares · 84 holdings · $6.2B · as of 2026-05-31
GNRState Street® SPDR® S&P® Global Natural Resources ETF
State Street (SPDR) · 94 holdings · $4.8B · as of 2026-08-06
Holdings snapshots are 67 days apart (EWC: 2026-05-31, GNR: 2026-08-06). Weights and index membership change between snapshots, so the true current overlap is typically higher than shown. For funds tracking the same index, the gap can be 5–15 points.
How similar are EWC and GNR?
iShares MSCI Canada ETF (EWC, by iShares) holds 84 positions; State Street® SPDR® S&P® Global Natural Resources ETF (GNR, by State Street (SPDR)) holds 94. They have 14 holdings in common, and by portfolio weight the two funds are 13.9% identical. In practical terms the pair is lightly overlapping, with most of each portfolio distinct.
- Overlap by Weight
- 13.9%Sum of the smaller weight of each shared holding
- Shared Holdings
- 14EWC holds 84 · GNR holds 94
- Weight in Shared Holdings
- EWC 22%·GNR 18%Share of each fund's weight in stocks both funds own
Based on each fund's latest official holdings. How is this calculated?
What makes each fund different
Only in EWC
70 of 84 positions (77.9% of the fund) are not held by GNR. Showing the top 30 by weight.
Sector Breakdown
| Sector | EWC | GNR |
|---|---|---|
| Materials | 15.5% | 57.3% |
| Financials | 37.4% | 0.0% |
| Energy | 17.1% | 32.0% |
| Information Technology | 8.2% | 0.0% |
| Industrials | 5.5% | 0.0% |
| Other Sectors | 9.3% | 4.6% |
| Unclassified | 6.9% | 5.5% |
Share of each fund's portfolio weight by GICS-style sector, compiled from issuer fund data and our own classification of the holdings, not the issuers' published sector charts. “Unclassified” is weight we could not classify (7% of EWC, 6% of GNR).
Performance
| Fund | 1M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y (ann.) | 5Y (ann.) | 10Y (ann.) | Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EWC | +5.0% | +14.2% | +31.3% | +22.9% | +12.6% | +11.6% | 1.22% |
| GNR | +9.0% | +20.6% | +37.3% | +13.2% | +11.1% | +10.4% | 2.46% |
Total returns including dividends, from adjusted daily closes as of 2026-08-07. 3Y/5Y/10Y are annualized. Yield is trailing-12-month distributions over the last close. Past performance does not predict future results.
Project the growth of $10,000 in EWC vs GNR →
Shared Holdings(14)
The top 10 shared positions account for 88% of the overlap, led by AEM, ABX and CNQ.
 AEMAgnico Eagle Mines Ltd. | 3.00% | 2.03% | 2.03% |
|---|---|---|---|
 ABXBarrick Mining Corp. | 2.34% | 1.67% | 1.67% |
 CNQCanadian Natural Resources Ltd. | 3.08% | 1.63% | 1.63% |
 WPMWheaton Precious Metals Corp. | 1.98% | 1.37% | 1.37% |
 SUSuncor Energy, Inc. | 2.44% | 1.27% | 1.27% |
 FNVFranco-Nevada Corp. | 1.45% | 1.08% | 1.08% |
 NTRNutrien Ltd. | 1.08% | 4.70% | 1.08% |
 KUSDKinross Gold Corp. | 1.19% | 0.74% | 0.74% |
 TECKTeck Resources Ltd., Class B | 0.98% | 0.71% | 0.71% |
 CCJCameco Corp. | 1.59% | 0.71% | 0.71% |
 CVECenovus Energy, Inc. | 1.27% | 0.66% | 0.66% |
 FMFirst Quantum Minerals Ltd. | 0.71% | 0.49% | 0.49% |
 IMOImperial Oil Ltd. | 0.65% | 0.33% | 0.33% |
 IVNIvanhoe Mines Ltd., Class A | 0.22% | 0.15% | 0.15% |
Frequently Asked Questions
How much do EWC and GNR overlap?
EWC and GNR overlap by 13.9% of portfolio weight. They share 14 holdings (EWC holds 84 positions and GNR holds 94), based on each fund's latest SEC-reported holdings.
Is it redundant to own both EWC and GNR?
The two portfolios are 13.9% identical by weight. Owning both is not redundant. Most of each portfolio is distinct, so the funds can serve different roles.
What are the biggest shared holdings of EWC and GNR?
The largest positions held by both funds are AEM, ABX, CNQ, WPM and SU. Together the top 10 shared positions account for 88% of the total overlap.
What does EWC own that GNR doesn't?
70 positions (77.9% of EWC) are unique to EWC, led by RY, TD and SHOP. In the other direction, 80 positions (81.8% of GNR) are unique to GNR.