EWC vs IXC: Holdings Overlap
iShares · 84 holdings · $6.2B · as of 2026-05-31
iShares · 60 holdings · $2.8B · as of 2026-03-31
Holdings snapshots are 61 days apart (EWC: 2026-05-31, IXC: 2026-03-31). Weights and index membership change between snapshots, so the true current overlap is typically higher than shown. For funds tracking the same index, the gap can be 5–15 points.
How similar are EWC and IXC?
iShares MSCI Canada ETF (EWC, by iShares) holds 84 positions; iShares Global Energy ETF (IXC, by iShares) holds 60. They have 10 holdings in common, and by portfolio weight the two funds are 13.6% identical. In practical terms the pair is lightly overlapping, with most of each portfolio distinct.
- Overlap by Weight
- 13.6%Sum of the smaller weight of each shared holding
- Shared Holdings
- 10EWC holds 84 · IXC holds 60
- Weight in Shared Holdings
- EWC 17%·IXC 14%Share of each fund's weight in stocks both funds own
Based on each fund's latest official holdings. How is this calculated?
What makes each fund different
Only in EWC
74 of 84 positions (83.1% of the fund) are not held by IXC. Showing the top 30 by weight.
Sector Breakdown
| Sector | EWC | IXC |
|---|---|---|
| Energy | 17.1% | 99.6% |
| Financials | 37.4% | 0.0% |
| Materials | 15.5% | 0.0% |
| Information Technology | 8.2% | 0.0% |
| Industrials | 5.5% | 0.0% |
| Other Sectors | 9.3% | 0.2% |
| Unclassified | 6.9% | 0.0% |
Share of each fund's portfolio weight by GICS-style sector, compiled from issuer fund data and our own classification of the holdings, not the issuers' published sector charts. “Unclassified” is weight we could not classify (7% of EWC, 0% of IXC).
Performance
| Fund | 1M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y (ann.) | 5Y (ann.) | 10Y (ann.) | Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EWC | +5.0% | +14.2% | +31.3% | +22.9% | +12.6% | +11.6% | 1.22% |
| IXC | +5.9% | +29.6% | +39.8% | +15.2% | +21.2% | +9.8% | 2.93% |
Total returns including dividends, from adjusted daily closes as of 2026-08-07. 3Y/5Y/10Y are annualized. Yield is trailing-12-month distributions over the last close. Past performance does not predict future results.
Project the growth of $10,000 in EWC vs IXC →
Shared Holdings(10)
The top 10 shared positions account for 100% of the overlap, led by ENB, CNQ and SU.
 ENBEnbridge Inc. COM | 3.89% | 3.15% | 3.15% |
|---|---|---|---|
 CNQCanadian Natural Resources Limited COM NPV | 3.08% | 2.70% | 2.70% |
 SUSuncor Energy Inc. COM NPV 'NEW' | 2.44% | 2.09% | 2.09% |
 TRPTC Energy Corp COM NPV | 2.25% | 1.73% | 1.73% |
 CCJCameco Corp. | 1.59% | 1.26% | 1.26% |
 CVECenovus Energy, Inc. | 1.27% | 0.96% | 0.96% |
 PBAPembina Pipeline Corporation COM NPV | 0.88% | 0.69% | 0.69% |
 IMOImperial Oil Ltd. | 0.65% | 0.52% | 0.52% |
 TOUTourmaline Oil Corp. | 0.55% | 0.47% | 0.47% |
| CANADIAN DOLLAR | 0.16% | 0.03% | 0.03% |
Frequently Asked Questions
How much do EWC and IXC overlap?
EWC and IXC overlap by 13.6% of portfolio weight. They share 10 holdings (EWC holds 84 positions and IXC holds 60), based on each fund's latest SEC-reported holdings.
Is it redundant to own both EWC and IXC?
The two portfolios are 13.6% identical by weight. Owning both is not redundant. Most of each portfolio is distinct, so the funds can serve different roles.
What are the biggest shared holdings of EWC and IXC?
The largest positions held by both funds are ENB, CNQ, SU, TRP and CCJ. Together the top 10 shared positions account for 100% of the total overlap.
What does EWC own that IXC doesn't?
74 positions (83.1% of EWC) are unique to EWC, led by RY, TD and SHOP. In the other direction, 50 positions (86.1% of IXC) are unique to IXC.