EWC vs LVHI: Holdings Overlap
iShares · 84 holdings · $6.2B · as of 2026-05-31
LVHIFranklin International Low Volatility High Dividend Index ETF
Franklin Templeton · 192 holdings · $5.5B · as of 2026-03-31
Holdings snapshots are 61 days apart (EWC: 2026-05-31, LVHI: 2026-03-31). Weights and index membership change between snapshots, so the true current overlap is typically higher than shown. For funds tracking the same index, the gap can be 5–15 points.
How similar are EWC and LVHI?
iShares MSCI Canada ETF (EWC, by iShares) holds 84 positions; Franklin International Low Volatility High Dividend Index ETF (LVHI, by Franklin Templeton) holds 192. They have 14 holdings in common, and by portfolio weight the two funds are 14.7% identical. In practical terms the pair is lightly overlapping, with most of each portfolio distinct.
- Overlap by Weight
- 14.7%Sum of the smaller weight of each shared holding
- Shared Holdings
- 14EWC holds 84 · LVHI holds 192
- Weight in Shared Holdings
- EWC 19%·LVHI 16%Share of each fund's weight in stocks both funds own
Based on each fund's latest official holdings. How is this calculated?
What makes each fund different
Only in EWC
70 of 84 positions (80.6% of the fund) are not held by LVHI. Showing the top 30 by weight.
Sector Breakdown
| Sector | EWC | LVHI |
|---|---|---|
| Financials | 37.4% | 21.6% |
| Energy | 17.1% | 16.8% |
| Materials | 15.5% | 5.5% |
| Industrials | 5.5% | 10.2% |
| Utilities | 2.0% | 9.6% |
| Other Sectors | 15.5% | 27.3% |
| Unclassified | 6.9% | 5.8% |
Share of each fund's portfolio weight by GICS-style sector, compiled from issuer fund data and our own classification of the holdings, not the issuers' published sector charts. “Unclassified” is weight we could not classify (7% of EWC, 6% of LVHI).
Performance
| Fund | 1M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y (ann.) | 5Y (ann.) | 10Y (ann.) | Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EWC | +5.0% | +14.2% | +31.3% | +22.9% | +12.6% | +11.6% | 1.22% |
| LVHI | +4.0% | +18.9% | +33.8% | +23.2% | +16.9% | +11.5% | 4.49% |
Total returns including dividends, from adjusted daily closes as of 2026-08-07. 3Y/5Y/10Y are annualized. Yield is trailing-12-month distributions over the last close. Past performance does not predict future results.
Project the growth of $10,000 in EWC vs LVHI →
Shared Holdings(14)
The top 10 shared positions account for 93% of the overlap, led by CNQ, SU and CM.
3.08% | 2.94% | 2.94% | |
2.44% | 2.34% | 2.34% | |
3.30% | 1.82% | 1.82% | |
3.22% | 1.78% | 1.78% | |
2.25% | 1.46% | 1.46% | |
0.88% | 1.07% | 0.88% | |
0.91% | 0.79% | 0.79% | |
1.08% | 0.70% | 0.70% | |
0.51% | 0.50% | 0.50% | |
0.46% | 0.61% | 0.46% | |
0.45% | 0.53% | 0.45% | |
0.38% | 0.29% | 0.29% | |
0.21% | 0.24% | 0.21% | |
0.06% | 0.49% | 0.06% |
Frequently Asked Questions
How much do EWC and LVHI overlap?
EWC and LVHI overlap by 14.7% of portfolio weight. They share 14 holdings (EWC holds 84 positions and LVHI holds 192), based on each fund's latest SEC-reported holdings.
Is it redundant to own both EWC and LVHI?
The two portfolios are 14.7% identical by weight. Owning both is not redundant. Most of each portfolio is distinct, so the funds can serve different roles.
What are the biggest shared holdings of EWC and LVHI?
The largest positions held by both funds are CNQ, SU, CM, BNS and TRP. Together the top 10 shared positions account for 93% of the total overlap.
What does EWC own that LVHI doesn't?
70 positions (80.6% of EWC) are unique to EWC, led by RY, TD and SHOP. In the other direction, 178 positions (81.1% of LVHI) are unique to LVHI.